<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Sony Ericsson's wild Xperia Pureness gets FCC approval</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/sony-ericssons-wild-xperia-pureness-gets-fcc-approval/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Sony Ericsson's wild Xperia Pureness gets FCC approval</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson's wild Xperia Pureness gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/sony-ericssons-wild-xperia-pureness-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/sony-ericssons-wild-xperia-pureness-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if anyone at Sony has thought about the fact that someone else could see what you're typing in a text message, for example, if they could read backwards?  Or if they were stealthily looking at your phone in their compact mirror instead of touching up their makeup?  Assuming it's an LCD screen, I would hope they have a polarizer only on the front!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson's wild Xperia Pureness gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/sony-ericssons-wild-xperia-pureness-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/sony-ericssons-wild-xperia-pureness-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not an LCD. An LCD couldn't do this. That's the whole point. I think it's a variation on self-frosting "smart glass".<br><br>The flipside of the transparent display is that you could probably see anybody squinting at your screen anyway. Of course given that they'd have to be three feet away to make the writing out means that's rather a moot point.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sockatume]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 12:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony Ericsson's wild Xperia Pureness gets FCC approval]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/sony-ericssons-wild-xperia-pureness-gets-fcc-approval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/sony-ericssons-wild-xperia-pureness-gets-fcc-approval/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why on hearth would anyone buy this abysmal poopoo?<br>SE should concentrate on bringing out the Android powered X3, if it wants to survive, possibly without messing it up, like they did with every single smartphone they attempted to produce.<br>I still remember how much I loved my T28i (must have been 10 years ago?) , and if Ericcson would produce something worth using I could be tempted to give it chance (maybe)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plexus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 6:12PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
