<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I will buy a BD-RW drive if these come out and dont cost too much. I'm sure they'll be expensive tho, like all new technology.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slarity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</guid><description><![CDATA[They don't even need to go to 100GB. A 75 GB disc would be fine. 50GB for Video data and 25GB for audio data. Less compression would be used for video. <br>Even better, just make the audio DD+ (5GB) and the rest for Video (70GB).<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevon27]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 4:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do you own an HD camcorder? More space please!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slarity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 5:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</guid><description><![CDATA[This will never happen until well after there is a meaningful BD50 storage market.  Which there isn't yet.  You can get a 1.5TB hard drive for $80.  What would you want a 50GB disc for when they cost upwards of $10?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kcmurphy88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 6:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, yes I would. I would like to be able to backup, not everything, but my most precious stuff and store it somewhere else if say, for instance, there's a fire that takes all my equipment out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonsson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2009 2:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</guid><description><![CDATA[And why not just put it on a much cheaper hard drive, then store that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kcmurphy88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2009 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pressed blu-ray discs that held more data which would mean less need for multiple discs would be welcome if the reliability was there but I get the feeling we won't see these for a long time. <br><br>As for burned media... do blu-rays have the same issues DVD does? That is, you have to use quality media to get a burn that lasts a while (and even those can degrade over time)? <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[h0mi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't have any BluRay movies bigger than 44GB. Let me buy a stack of 20 Dual Layer 50GB discs for less than $100 and I am in! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 2nd 2009 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TDK stacks 10 layers on a single 320GB disc]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/02/tdk-stacks-10-layers-on-a-single-320gb-disc/</guid><description><![CDATA[Beyond the data storage issue, now that 3D for the home is on the horizon there's a real need for this with movie discs. They'd better start getting these higher-capacity discs out of the lab pronto, because without them, there's a good chance picture quality will suffer on a long movie.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. E]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 3rd 2009 10:40AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
