<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[2nd place still means losing to Windows Me]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Techie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[not according to the article..its saying that symbian is the most widespread OS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abbysdaddy1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[And next year is also going to be the year of linux on the desktop...  Give me a break!  Android is just another linux.  Go to Tmobile and play with a hero.  Honestly Android sucks and I can't believe Engadget gives it as much love as it does.  Google must have deep pockets to plant so many stories here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ardentra]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yep, Google pays off Engadget to support their mobile OS.<br><br>Go find a tin-foil hat and wait in fear for the alien invasion to come, I'm sure you'll be safe from it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tmacfan4321]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Most of europe uses symbian, but thats rapidly decreasing as more choices are coming out. It's biggest competitor is by far the iPhone OS. But apples been kinda lazy lately so it probably will take over.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob47]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Umm, no. <br><br>The Symbian will gain more marketshare just from ever increasing prosessiing power of the low end phones. More and more of them will be S60, at least Nokia phones.<br><br>ps. Symbian isn't the number one mobile OS, it's Nokias S40. Symbian is the number one smartphone mobile OS. So, by the 2012 Android might be number 3 phone OS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Newone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://metrics.admob.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Aug-blog-pic.png" rel="nofollow">http://metrics.admob.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Aug-blog-pic.png</a><br><br>I'd like to point out that Ad Mob's stats show Android OS up to 4th place, just one percentage point below RIM, worldwide.<br><br>I'm curious to find out why anyone thinks it'll take 3 years for Android to move into second place, considering the number of Android-based phones coming out worldwide through the end of the year, including in China.  Nokia's worldwide share is slowly declining while the Asian manufacturers - who appear to have a strong liking towards Android - is increasing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerrrg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[That admobs statistic isn't sold phones, but datatraffic statistics of admobs network.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Newone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 9:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[gerrrg<br><br>You iDiot.<br><br>That's not OS marketshare.<br><br>THIS is OS marketshare.<br><br><a href="http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=910112" rel="nofollow">http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=910112</a><br><br>It's:<br>1.  Symbian OS<br>2. RiM OS<br>3. Windows Mobile<br>4. iPhone OS<br>5. Android<br>6. Palm<br><br>You're looking at traffic, NOT marketshare.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WindowsFTW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 11:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, that Gartner report is kinda old. I know because the iPhone passed WinMo a long time ago.<br><br><a href="http://www.canalys.com/pr/2009/r2009081.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.canalys.com/pr/2009/r2009081.htm</a><br><br>Worldwide it's:<br><br>1. Symbian OS<br>2. RiM OS<br>3. iPhone OS<br>4. Windows Mobile<br>5. Android<br>6. Palm<br><br>In the U.S. it's<br><br>1. RIM OS<br>2. iPhone OS<br>3. Everyone else.<br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Detox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 11:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Detox, <br><br>Um No.<br><br>That only shows Q2 marketshare.<br><br>You are deluding yourself however if you believe for a second that the iPhone has a larger install base than WinMo.<br><br>WinMo spanks the iPhone in terms of install base worldwide. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WindowsFTW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 3:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA["That only shows Q2 marketshare."<br><br>Uh, yeah, right. The iPhone has been outselling Windows Mobile for several quarters now. You think things have gotten worse or better for WinMo since Q2?<br><br>WinMo's biggest carrier, HTC, their profit just took an 18 percent dive last quarter.<br><br><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091006-704340.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091006-704340.html</a><br><br>WinMo 6.5 is getting universally bad reviews. WinMo 7.0 isn't coming until late 2010. Dude, WinMo is finished.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Detox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 6:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shit, I liked it when it was just a name, just wish Sony Ericsson would add android to there xperia line up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Monkey with glasses]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Xperia 3<br><br><br>Google it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, i forgot about the X3, but I rather it run on the X2, not a big fan of full touch screen, but your right, my bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Monkey with glasses]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[You missed the iSuppli report saying that Windows Mobile would be in this position by 2013 with 60 million handsets in use.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pedro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Analysts just make shit up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[@m:<br><br>The worst part is they get paid to do that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[@10minutehobo<br><br>I think that every time I see (I don't actually bother reading) an analyst report/prediction. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BeeQAL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ 10 min hobo<br>too bad they failed in predicting the recession...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smartmouth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh god, someone get a medic, were gonna need it after the apple fanboys arrive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Syntax Error]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[the thing with Apple is it wont be on any other phones but Apple phones......unless they really thing that the whole world is going to buy an iphone.  i guess that is what they are thinking, they sure thought it with the mac computer lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abbysdaddy1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, ha ha, you're right. That really worked out terrible for the iPod. Ha ha. Only 225 million sold. Losers. The iPhone is so finished.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Detox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA["unless they really thing that the whole world is going to buy an iphone."<br>The numbers don't lie.  Fair enough the iPhone is dominating the smart phone market, and you might not be concerned but I know every other handset maker out there surely is.  The reason why Android is spreading so fast is because most handset makers know this is the only chance they've got against competing with the iPhone.  On the other hand until Palms webos gets on more devices, and on more carriers I don't think Apple has anything to worry about.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[XChrisX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Google doesn't charge for Android. They don't sell hardware. They sell ads.<br>You think Apple wants a massive market-share by giving away their incredible iPhone/iPod touch business?<br><br>Priotities....<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 9:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[My favourite part about this article is the large android eating a donut :) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RioRyan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, The android even sorta looks like homer.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Syntax Error]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol i didnt really even notice<br>Dale]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[abbysdaddy1984]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[If Homer was Canadian...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zomg0t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[I strongly disagree with this prediction as it is just that... a prediction.<br><br>Who knows what the future will bring? Windows Mobile 7 may get 90% of the market share for all we know! Predictions turn out to be false more often than not.<br><br>In my personal opinion, I think Web OS and the iPhone's OS will be among the highest in market share. But, then again, who knows what the future holds :). Either way, mobile OS wars are good for consumers in the end.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hamerhead_12]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Both of those OSes won't be close to the top for one sole reason: they are tied down to Palm and Apple products only (respectively). <br><br>iPhone OS and Web OS won't go anywhere until they branch out to different hardware manufacturers. It's just too bad for consumers because that will never happen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tmacfan4321]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[The way things are going with WebOS, I'm not so sure. I'd give it another year and track its progress but I highly doubt it will overtake Android the way things are going now.<br><br>iPhoneOS might have a chance if Apple spreads out to more carriers and make different form factors (and more affordable models).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Woooooo Open Source!<br><br>Go Linux!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tmacfan4321]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[True.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Should hopefully be Maemo 1st not Symbian. :) A TRULY open OS. Nokia is playing catch up with the rest of the boys as far as hardware though. Omnia HD2, HTC Leo, and I'm missing another drool worthy phone but I can't remember the name and no it aint the iPhone so don't get too excited.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Archos phone tablet! yes of course! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[i guess they would have arrived at this conclusion, assuming that there won't be any development on the other mobile OSs till 2012... bottom line u really can't predict these things...  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[doobster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I don't know about you guys, but my next phone is either going to be a WebOS or an Android phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CaramelZappa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[I know this isn't exactly the right place, but I wish they would put GoogleDocs integration into the next Android build. That would be so awesome. You could download files for offline editting and then it would sync back with the online one when you get back online... I hope someone makes a GoogleDoc app on the Palm Pre soon. Maybe there is one and I haven't noticed it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Try gdocs- its in the market, and has been a godsend for me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gcc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 9:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[why don't you tell them <a href="http://productideas.appspot.com/#15/e=cf&t=5" rel="nofollow">http://productideas.appspot.com/#15/e=cf&t=5</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Atlantian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 9:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Windows Mobile may be a household name but it's not a name associated with functionality, dependability or reliability.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lancelot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Weak overated. Only on 2-3 USA cell phones n been out for a year already.  <br>Apps suck on it compared to iPhones 85,000!!<br>Now that is sick dude! Nokia blows in USA   Its brand has lost credibility here in America, kinda like Hyundai. In America we here nokia n immediately think lowend cell phone that in 2 years doesn't have a smartphone that can compare to iphone3gs. It took nokia 28 months after iPhone cane out out to finally roll out their $750 n900. iPhone 3g $49, hmmh I wonder which one will succeed here in America. ?<br>A $25 dollar nokia comes with symbian os. Incredibly weak. <br>Concentrate on an iphonekiller already. Android takeover yeah right.  I'll believe it when I see it most overhyped os of all times! I've used android g1 plus mytouch. They blow on so many levels compared to iPhone.  It's amazing to see how bad apple is schooling raping n dominating. Btw I hate apple n don't own apple computer. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Truth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are you typing on your iPhone? That must explain why you make no sense.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dafrety]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[OF ALL TIME!!!!! <br><br>I like the name, but I don't think it matches your post at all :/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chronotriggerjm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[The world ends in 2012. There's a movie about it coming out soon.<br><br>So, they can predict whatever they want. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Waffle Slayer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone who thinks that Android isn't already a great OS & has a great future (once it gets the hardware it deserves) doesn't know their mobile OS systems. Open source will always have an advantage in that people work to make it better without the concern for monetary returns. That's MS big problem, they always stop short of what would make windows mobile a great OS because of R&D cost. Their first concern is always profit, just look at their previous offerings. This isn't an issue when developing an open source OS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lancelot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[And thats why we have linux as a great consumer desktop operating system.  How long has Linux been around 15-20+ years?  Where is all of your "makes it better without monetary concerns" crap?  Android stinks and gets an incredibly disproportionate amount of pub because google slapped their name on it.  They haven't really innovated anything in the phone space.  Its just a bad rehash or copy of the elegant designs that blazed the trails that came before them.  I mean seriously what is the killer feature of android that you can't get on anyone elses phone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ardentra]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[@adentra<br><br>If Android is just a big cumulation of many of the best features you can get on "any other phones" and it's only been out for as long as it has, then kudo's to it :P It seems to be a hell of a lot better constructed than win-mo as far as an OS is concerned, and it has many of the conveniences and novelty that the iPhone brings, without being tied to one carrier. <br><br>As far as I'm concerned, I see nothing wrong with this. Look how fast it's come along in such a short period of time, this is the benefits that a large scale open source platform can bring. How long has Win-mo been out? Look at where it is tech wise in comparison. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chronotriggerjm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 3:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/07/android-could-nab-second-place-in-mobile-operating-systems-by-20/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a HTC Magic and Android is a piece of sh1t. Only Bluetooth profiles are headset and A2DP, doesn't even have call meters! I know you can download apps to do these, but Google is just leaving up to others to pick up their shit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AaronX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2009 8:20PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
