<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung Behold II handled with less battery than we'd like</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung Behold II handled with less battery than we'd like</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Behold II handled with less battery than we'd like]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still no word on the processor inside this one?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Cabron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 11th 2009 7:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Behold II handled with less battery than we'd like]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</guid><description><![CDATA[This phone could possibly replace my G1. Come one T-Mobile/Samsung, give us more info on the Behold II.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shaitien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Behold II handled with less battery than we'd like]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is definitely a step in the right direction.  I'm looking to ditch my berry now that contract is up and I'm excited about all the android offerings.  But do we really need all these buttons and navigation pads/trackballs?  At least try to hide or minimize them.  Give us a sexy, thin, clean, black Android brick.  And while you're at it, it's been over a year so how about stepping up the processors?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fernandizzel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 5:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Behold II handled with less battery than we'd like]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a g1, and I think the only way I am going to upgrade is if I get a 4" screen, with snapdragon chipset. The hardware really needs to step it up, because the only thing seperating these things are slick gui's and different plastic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZOLLA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 5:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Behold II handled with less battery than we'd like]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</guid><description><![CDATA[omg whats up with the back of the phone its horrendous!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joseee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 9:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Behold II handled with less battery than we'd like]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</guid><description><![CDATA[The phone is slick-looking and Touch Wiz looks cool, but if it's got the same processor and internal storage as the G1/MyTouch it makes no sense to upgrade.  I've owned the G1 for a year and I've learned my lesson...I love T-Mobile but the first carrier that comes out with an Android phone with a 1GhZ processor and at least 8GB internal storage gets my business.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Boogie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2009 11:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Behold II handled with less battery than we'd like]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/08/samsung-behold-ii-handled-with-less-battery-than-wed-like/</guid><description><![CDATA[This probably has the same proc as the Samsung Moment, the 800 MHz S3C6410.  Seems like all the handsets that Samsung is launching this time around are coming with that chip.  I could be wrong though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gandhisfist]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 12th 2009 6:25PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
