<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Cellphones thinner than ever</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Cellphones thinner than ever</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cellphones thinner than ever]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</guid><description><![CDATA[3 year old samsung x820 still making thin phones look fat...       :-D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2009 9:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cellphones thinner than ever]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</guid><description><![CDATA[the razr started it all.<br><br>unless you're an apple fan, in which case the iphone started it all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TouchMe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2009 11:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cellphones thinner than ever]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would definitely love to see less emphasis on making phones smaller and adding features, and more focus on battery life.  I'm pretty sure that phones are a good size nowadays.  We're not carrying around 2 lb bricks anymore, except for costumes/jokes.  One would think that the thinner these phones get, the more likely they are to fail, from lack of durability.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 11th 2009 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cellphones thinner than ever]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</guid><description><![CDATA[samsung u106 5.9mm i have one xD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoshiki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 12th 2009 3:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cellphones thinner than ever]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/10/cellphones-thinner-than-ever/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're right Joe. I make exactly that point in my report (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/yabxjzl" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yabxjzl</a>) that the trend to thin phones can't go on forever. Yes the Samsung Ultra series uses amazing technology to make it so thin (TouchMe is right about the RAZR starting it all <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yllsfjv" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yllsfjv</a> and Samsung has developed it further) but I'd be scared to put the U106 in my pocket in case it breaks when I sit down or bend over, Yoshiki!  And battery technology really needs to catch up. The "energy gap" in cellphones is growing (<a href="http://tinyurl.com/csmyfr" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/csmyfr</a>) because improvements in component power consumption and battery chemistries aren't sufficient to offset the growth in feature penetration and application usage. We really need something like fuel cell technology, Silver Zinc and/or some other chemistry to take over from Li-Ion and give us a 30% or 50% jump in energy density, instead of the pitiful 8% improvement that Li-Ion is able to give each year despite massive investment in R&D. We live in hope.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SpecTRAX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 12th 2009 10:42AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
