http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/ Engadget Comments for Nikon D3s leaked by UK press, expected to ship December with impressive ISO range, £4,200 price tag http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 7:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 8:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/ and can be further boosted to an incredulous 102,400.

I think you mean incredible? Anyway, if you can get even remotely usable shots at 102,400 I will be pretty impressed. My Canon tops out at 12,800 and that's pretty much unusable.]]>Oct 13th 2009 7:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 7:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 7:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 8:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 8:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 8:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 8:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 8:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 8:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 9:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/
Sample photos:
http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d3s/sample.htm

Wow, at that ISO6400 image. ISO6400 for even the best cameras is an unusable mess. The ISO1600 looks like its taken at ISO400-800.]]>Oct 14th 2009 1:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 14th 2009 3:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 7:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 7:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/I'm not a pro, and therefore If this monster would have costed the same as my beautiful , new GH1 , I would still have chosen the gh1.
It's much easier to use and to get top notch results with it (maybe with some aftershooting photoshopping), it much lighter and smaller, and just a fraction of the difference of price would get me a full complement of lenses and accessories.
And I'm not even sure it makes a lot of sense even for pros: aren't Leicas or (different format) Hasselblads almost in the same price range?
]]>Oct 13th 2009 8:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 8:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/However, this does make a lot of sense for pros, depending on what they are doing. Hasselblads and most Leicas are a totally different kettle of fish. Canons and Nikons around this price range a bread and butter for most pros.]]>Oct 13th 2009 8:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 11:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/
Good job i'm a Canon guy waiting for the 1DMK4 next week. At last, a proper reply to Nikon's heavyweights?

]]>Oct 13th 2009 8:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/
On the other hand a higher base sensitivity is a good thing when shooting at high ISO.]]>Oct 13th 2009 9:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 8:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 9:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/
as far as the iso performance I would guess that it's equal (or probably better) than the D3. Look around for reviews and you'll see that the previous had insanely good high iso quality.

1080p - ever consider buying a video camera? ;)]]>Oct 13th 2009 10:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 10:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 10:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/Oct 13th 2009 10:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/
Exactly, that's what video cameras are made for.]]>Oct 13th 2009 11:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/nikon-d3s-leaked-by-uk-press-expected-to-ship-december-with-imp/
Don't want it, don't need it and would be glad if the camera was cheaper without it.

As for the ISO, going by Nikon's recent track record; 12800 is gonna be perfectly usable with H1 and H2 being acceptably good. Hell, like someone said earlier; convert H3 to B&W and that can be used as well.]]>Oct 13th 2009 11:55PM