<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[It actually looks pretty good. The touch keyboard would be a good asset on my opinion. <br><br>I know they could sell more than books and coffee ! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tikiteko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah until it sucks away battery life.  There's a good reason current e-readers don't do this sort of thing.  You can read, literally, many lengthy books on a single charge on things like the Kindle (as long as you leave the wireless off while you're not using it), and some devices (the Sony I believe) use essentially _no_ power except to turn pages.  Add an active display or other power hogging, unnecessary "features", and you'll have to charge every few hours of use.  Not good for this sort of device.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oGMo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Competition is the greatest thing ever...<br><br>But I have to agree with ogmo... Long battery life really is a priority for me on an e-reader. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vance]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol @ you guys, worrying about the battery life.<br><br>let's let them release the thing and announce specs before you make these sorts of claims.  I would highly doubt that the LCD can't be turned off completely.  <br><br>THIS THING IS HOT. This provides soooooo much more functionality to the e-reader.  Navigating through material, viewing embedded video/pictures, a touchscreen keyboard that's at least semi-usable, a good web browser.  I would totally buy this thing, even at $400.  Throw in 10 free books, and free data for a year, and I'm all over this thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crawdad689]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree that this is very cool. It seems that battery life my suffer some, but that could be mitigated if you offer some sort of battery management, such as intuitively shutting off the touch screen altogether when not in use. Probably wouldn't get quite as good battery life as, say, the Kindle, but I bet it's still be respectable within the world of ebook readers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Martin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[The thing is, none of these are what you care about when actually using an e-reader.  Never once have I thought, "if only this had video or color it would be a much better experience."  It usually comes down to things, some of which you may not consider: page turn speed ... full pdf rendering ... fixed-width font ... dictionary being extensive enough to cover everything in "Book of the New Sun"...<br><br>Page turn speed is probably the biggest thing that needs fixed at this point.  There is no analog to flipping through a book looking for some scene.  Even if you can search for a word or phrase, that's very hit or miss.  A tiny LCD is not going to cover it .. you have to be able to visually scan all the text on a page quickly.  E-paper page turn speed is just not fast enough for that yet.<br><br>And finally, the truly biggest issue: are the books you want to read available for your device?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oGMo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do want!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[couldn't agree more]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[That looks pretty sweet, actually.  Not too worried about the battery life; presumably the backlight for the LCD will be LEDs and it'll power off in 30-60 seconds of inactivity (like a cellphone).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[the lcd will turn off automatically when not in use.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rudy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[If this is within $50 of any version of the kindle----Amazon is going to be scrambling.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[...I'm glad there are more people in this eInk reader game, cause in a few years, those things will actually be affordable (when they get to under $100 I'll think about it, until then, it's not even something I'd consider "Nice to have" ). Looking forward to seeing this one in action though....<br>By the way, with this, we're actually one step closer to those Star Trek, next generation tablets that everyone uses for reports and tea time readings. LOVE IT :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very pretty, but wouldn't it kinda defeat the battery life advantage of an ereader?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimbosveld]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not if it's all e-ink!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LiqwidZero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah...but it's not, right? The bottom screen is some sort of color touch screen, definitely not e-ink.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimbosveld]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're right. The bottom is an LCD. But I'm sure there would be a power save function of some sort that shuts the screen down after a little bit. With that and the E-ink display, I could see it getting near the same battery power as a Kindle if it has a slightly larger battery.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LiqwidZero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wonderful in two ways - 1) innovation to get around E-Reader limitations and 2) Engadget referring directly to Gizmodo. *sniff* But I wonder if it'll have battery life for lunch? There'd better be a way of operating the machine with the screen off.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[From what I understand after reading the Gizmodo article, the LCD will only be on when needed, and off when reading a book.<br>So yes, it may use a bit more battery than the Kindle and Sony's readers, but it should make the user experience considerably better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it will still come down extra support, can I put my own files on it, can i do it via physical media. That and if it has PDF support. As it stands it looks really good a touch panel could be neat as long as it is not blazing fast etc like the ZuneHD or iPhone/touches. The real question is where does it land in the price game, at 3bills i'd snap it up in a hearbeat. But I doubt it will come in that low. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[DIE!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crawdad689]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[So it's not actually a colour e-ink display. but an e-ink with a colour LCD at the bottom? hmf.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[As others have said, battery life will be the thing that really makes or breaks this thing.  The touch screen is definitely a nice touch, but if it drains the battery 5 times faster than e-ink only ebook readers, then this thing is DOA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry for the double post, but I have one other thing to add.  How on earth are they going to sell this thing less than the Kindle?  The Sony pocket edition goes for $200, but it only has a 5" screen and doesn't have a mobile chip in it (which this does).  Also, none of the other readers on the market have a second screen, which probably requires a bit more battery too.<br><br>The article says that they intend to make up the difference with ebook sales, but then immediately after claims that their books will be published at a significant discount.  Something here doesn't add up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[the lcd will automatically turn off while reading a book and B&N hopes to recoup costs through ebook sales. only books published by B&N themselves will be offered at deep discounts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rudy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[But LCDs also require more processing power, and that stuff drains battery life even when idle.  Typical ebook reader energy usage is positively paltry, even when compared to something like an idle cell phone.  Just a small bump in energy usage could really make a big impact on the battery life of the device.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I see no real benefit for the color LCD display.  Do we really need to browse books in color or that fast?  Multi-touch is interesting, but scrolling and zooming will still be limited to e-ink speeds.  The only compelling reason I can think of is for the LCD strip to show banner ads for reduced pricing of the reader.<br><br>It is nice that this is not yet another re-packaging of the same old e-ink display.  I would be interested if the resolution was higher for pdf and comic viewing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[badbob001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wonder why the page turning arrows (I assume) on the right side are flipped between the two pics above...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TVGenius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Some one changed the texture file before the render....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barry99705]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[This does look more modern and sleeker. I would not mind having to charge it every week. The Kindle lasts longer doesn't it?<br><br>I imagine that the lower color more-energy-consuming portion would go into standby to reduce battery consumption. It still has the paddle wheels on the side to flip pages. You will likely only need to see the lower half when selecting a book, article, or journal or when you want to make notes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[No thanks I'll stick to my free reader.  It's called iPhone only $49. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Truth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[$49=free?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[The kindle software cost $49?  <br><br>That is absurd, since mobipocket reader (also an Amazon product) has been available free on every smartphone and PDA for years, and it has access to essentially the same electrinic bookstore that Kindle does.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tmarks11]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[You mean $49 a month for your free reader right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RandomGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[@randomguy <br><br>ha 49 a month for an iphone? iphone users wish.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[monty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[hopefully it's mutliplatform (Mac, Windows & Linux)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kibbled_bits]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[in this day and age it better be!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rudy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am concerned that while I am reading a book, the color LCD will be used to display advertisement messages. Mark my freaking words here, guys.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorilla800lbs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Put some duct tape over the LCD screen.  Problem solved!  :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeremy480]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ badbob001: panel applications besides resizing: <br><br>Doodle margin notes - the biggest one!<br>Display a persistent, clickable table of contents<br>...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorilla800lbs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have been watching the e-readers for a while and have been waiting to pull the trigger on a device, but they all have serious shortcomings. If this thing is does the following things I am buying one.<br><br>*   a decent job with a variety of formats, Doc, PDF, ePub, HTM, etc. <br>*   Has a good way to do annotations and take notes<br>*   Does not have a monthly subscription fee for connectivity<br>*   Sells for less than $300<br><br>Things that would be nice, that I am hoping for<br><br>*   A somewhat usable browser<br>*   Ability to use the LCD screen as a touchpad for selecting links, or words for lookup, add notations, circle/highlight words, etc.<br>*   Play audio, even better if it could play background music using the LCD screen while navigating. Text to speech would be nice.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RandomGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you need a tablet PC :) I'm not sure if manufacturers are able to give all that functionality, yet still maintain strong battery life and a reasonable price. <br><br>I'm sure one day a tablet PC will have astounding battery life and with a decent "ink" screen will do everything in one. Until then, compromise.!<br><br>I use my iPod for music, games, apps. My Song PRS505 for books. Good for me for the next few years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>I don't think these devices will get below $100, unless they are the smaller more "pocket" sized ones. $200 is not an unreasonable price for such a device, perhaps around $150 is a decent price point that starts to get them mainstream. Saying that, more and more people at airports have them so they are already finding their niche's. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[i've never wanted a piece of tech so bad since the first iphone. please mystical god of technology, let this be true!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rudy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[This looks good and makes sense. With All BN's having free wifi, I imagine this is the route it will take. I can order a book and when its avail, just download it.. get info, maybe even Author facts. With links to other books or references.. this is good for BN and sounds good. I dont see myself personally using it, because I am just a magazine reader/newspappers (no novels). But BN has a built in fan base, and stores.. could work out good for them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZOLLA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love my Kindle and I'm tied to the Kindle eco-system now since I "own" so many books. But this looks beautiful. The only two things I want my Kindle to do is support Word Docs natively - saving word docs as Text files is a pain and include a Backlight so I can read on overlight flights. I use one of the goofy Border lights but those are big and bulky. PDF functionality would be nice, but I hate the PDF format and really rarely use it - can't think of the last time I needed to read something PDF.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[malexandria]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not make it dark green or ocher like their logo instead of trying to look like a kindle?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pax copia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 2:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA["Why not make it dark green or ocher like their logo instead of trying to look like a kindle?"<br><br>Absolutely.. Nobody else makes rectangular white plastic gadgets.. .]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Bailey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Barnes &amp; Noble twin-screen e-reader revealed early?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/barnes-and-noble-twin-screen-e-reader-revealed-early/</guid><description><![CDATA[I use a iPhone, but any smartphone would do. No extra cost if you need a phone anyway. At the moment I have about 350 books on it, SF, mystery, general, new and public domain, in many formats. I buy from Amazon (Kindle), Baen , etc. wherever the content is cheaper.<br><br>Battery life sucks but that is a small price to pay for the advantages. I'm trying to limit the number of gadgets in my pocket. Unless you need to highlight and annotate or want to read comics and use graphics the iPhone screen is big enough. I get 100 words per page so it is quite adequate.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:15PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
