<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[i really want an android phone on verizon my omnia is nice but i want something fresh. Its this or the htc android device. but they really should release more info on the two especially if the rumors are true about them coming at the end of the month]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zabien]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree! More info on the Droid would be awesome (I'm assuming the Verizon verison of Hero wouldn't be all that different than Sprint's, I could be wrong though, but either way, there's tons of info on Sprint's Hero on teh netz).<br><br>I had an Omnia and haaaaaated it, so I switched back to my old Alias. I may even get an Android phone without being eligable to upgrade, depends on how expensive it'd be though :/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glazerorama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it indeed has the name "Droid" at release, I will ABSOLUTELY get it!  fuck yeah!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crawdad689]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[same, i would probably ditch my somewhat new blackberry ha. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 6:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Motorola Droid looks promising from the early Review that I read. It has much higher specs, a good processor, good camera with flash and loads of other things.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Billy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 19th 2009 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Some guys still don’t get it. Its not about “how good the other phone” is from the other pair of shoes.<br><br>But on how can it improve the lifestyle of the user who is utilizing it.<br><br>Next year a new phone will arrive.. again and again, till you realize: important thing is “how it made your life easier” in terms of communication. Not who is best phone in town.<br><br>sources: <a href="http://pinoytutorial.com/techtorial/motorola-droid-specs-revealed-in-motorola-site-temporarily/" rel="nofollow">http://pinoytutorial.com/techtorial/motorola-droid-specs-revealed-in-motorola-site-temporarily/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pinoytutorial]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 25th 2009 1:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can we get some UI shots of this thing already?  Why is Moto/VZW keeping this thing so secluded, we all know it's coming.  Bait the waters guys, generate some buzz.  God knows Moto needs a home run on this one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CoffeeDragon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[thou shalt check the read link before posting ;)<br><br>ok to be honest, it's from mr. noisycam...<br><br><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/13/motorola-sholes-droid-live-photos/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/13/motorola-sholes-droid-live-photos/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hq]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bait the waters?  This thing is already hyped.  With the Chocolate Touch falling flat due to no being closer to the BL40, this is THE phone I know that VZW people are talking about.  As far as being "a smartphone by VZW's standards", there's no way something like this would NOT be a smartphone on ANY carrier.<br><br>Maybe I'm just more hyped about it being a Verizon slave that's been waiting for something good to come along, but the hype with all the "leaks" is definitely there.  I do have to agree that Moto needs help and "this is the droid they're looking for".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish it didn't that that little chin thing...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Agenteyser]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree; or, if it's absolutely necessary, I wish the lip was silver, black, or some other color other than drab gray.  Either way, I am still pumped to get this thing (finally a decent smartphone on Verizon), and I'm sure that after a few weeks I won't even care about the lip.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tennseven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[finally some pics.... those motorola 'sholes have kept us waiting for so long ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hq]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[nice looking phone. i wonder if verizon will require a data plan with this phone like they do with their blackberry devices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[argonaut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Count on it. You're gonna have to pay to play with this guy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hey Ya]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, it's a smartphone by VZW's standards so yes, absolutely you'll need the data plan]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CoffeeDragon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA["These are not the droids you are looking for."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[If beauty truly is in the eyes of the beholder, the person who signed off on that design must be blind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Padilla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Judging from your Display Picture, you are not at master at finding or designing beauty... So, no soup for you...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tikiteko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[is it a requirement that everything that runs android must look bland and dated?<br>...i'm starting to see a trend here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iroq d. mullet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[thats a picture of the phone settings screen inside the menu, what are you expecting from that?  I dont know, maybe the iphone has some cool innovative way to tell you when version of the operating system is running.  Not saying the 2.0 is going to be anything special, but im atleast going to wait until i see a picure of the homescreen or menu to decide that.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[i am talking about the actual device itsef, not the OS. it looks so bland and uninspired. just like the g1 and most other android devices. if you say this is a nice, sleek design you're kidding yourself. looks like the LG Dare with a chin. and why bring iphne into this? just because i don't like this design doesn't mean i am automatically an iphone fan, i don't and probably never will own an iphone as a matter of fact.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iroq d. mullet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 5:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I get what you're saying, I felt the same way about the G1 until I actually played around with one in person.  It was actually really slick when you actually got a hold of it.  So while this one looks equally drab, if not worse, I'm withholding judgement until I get my mitts on it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the Hero is one of the nicest looking phones out there and for some bizarre reason i'm drawn to the DEXT/CLIQ apart from its thickness.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ilh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 6:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[The real issue is these touchscreen phones are pretty simple and straightforward.  Large screen followed by a few buttons.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deathwish238]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 9:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will this phone be dual mode?  GSM and CDMA?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it looks great.  I like the design, like the specs and (if the newer blurry pictures are accurate) like the keyboard.   I will get this phone, the only question is what carrier will I get it on.   Most likely verizon, but if somehow someway sprint gets it in the near future, I will save the money and go that route.   Either way, I will most likely use G Voice, and will probably buy the phone without subsidy.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Perry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[android version 2.0?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xaronfisk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[yes]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BlindMind3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[not confirmed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[not officially confirmed but it is a fact.  You'll see]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BlindMind3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll have one w/o the keyboard, please.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steel36]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does anyone have spec. information as of today? This looks to be another neat Android phone!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[List of Rumored Specifications<br><br>• OMAP3430 – 600 MHz ARM Cortex A8 + PowerVR SGX 530 GPU + 430MHz C64x+ DSP + ISP (Image Signal Processor)<br>• Dimensions 60.00 x 115.80 x 13.70 mm<br>• Weight 169 g<br>• Battery Li-ion 1400 mAh.<br>• Standby 450 hours, talk time 420 minutes<br>• 3.7-inch touch-sensitive display with a resolution of 854×480 pixels, 16 million color depth. Physical screen size is 45.72 mm by 81.34 mm.<br>• 512MB/256MB ROM/RAM<br>• microSD / microSDHC expansion slot<br>• Camera: 5.0 megapixel with autofocus and video recorder<br>• Connectivity: USB2.0, 3.5mm audio jack, Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR, Wi-Fi<br>• Supported audio formats: AMR-NB/WB, MP3, PCM / WAV, AAC, AAC +, eAAC +, WMA<br>• Supported video formats: MPEG-4, H.263, H.264, WMV<br>• GPS navigation<br>• Package Contents: Phone Motorola Sholes, battery, charger, USB cable, 8GB MicroSD memory card and other literature.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barry99705]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good to see Mr Blurrycam has finally discovered <a href="http://steadycam.org/" rel="nofollow">http://steadycam.org/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0mth0ma5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Android 2.0?  Looks like the Samsung CEO was dead wrong on Eclair not shipping until 2010...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anderoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yea, That's what i noticed too. Last I heard, Android 2.0 wouldn't be released until 2010. Can anyone confirm that it will be shipping with Android 2.0?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Numz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is supposed to be the first phone with 2.0, the rest of the phones will be stuck with 1.6 for the next few months.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[barry99705]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[2.0 will be available only on the sholes/tao/droid (STD) until Q2 2010.  Thats when there will be a full public release.  So the Samsung rep wasnt exactly wrong, he just failed to explain that there actually will be one device that will have 2.0]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish Google would release new versions of AOSP to the public before manufacturers... they did this with HTC and 1.5 too. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[coolbho3000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mr. Samsung was referring only to his company, it appears.  It probably helps when your company has a new "alliance" with the OS provider.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steel36]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[You are welcome Engadget, I am glad you posted it. ;) I think I peed on my pants when I saw the pics at BGR]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tikiteko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[This isn't the Droid I am looking for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Takashi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am putting an R2D2 skin on the back of this when it comes out]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pio!pio!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's totally the droid I'm looking for.. just not so much VZW..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Asten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would like it even better if it still had the three face buttons along with getting rid of the "MOTOROLA" on top]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yummy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ndsuniverse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[What happened to the sexy chrome edged version?  this version looks boring]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not impressed with that build at all. I'm a huge Motorola fan, and was hoping they'd deliver, but this thing is just bland, and rather ugly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[traceroute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love it when people make judgements on how a phone looks based off some crappy, blurry, noisey shakecam shot like this.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McPOW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2009 3:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-sholes-finally-gets-a-decent-headshot/</guid><description><![CDATA[uglyphone is ugly :|<br><br>what the hell were they thinking]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 4:45PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
