<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[first]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hgaara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[to fade.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xValentine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 3:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm still amazed every time I read 102,480.  Seriously, it is ridiculous.<br>My little D200 does up to 1600 not counting the Hi modes.  True, this is only to 12,800 (only!) without going into hi...but...wow.<br>And I still have to wonder why it is spelled "hi" and not "high."<br><br><br>This really all boils down to...I want!  NOW!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[collindow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[The d200 is anything but good. Its a horrible camera. I've used a d3, and I must say, as it is still quite functional and nice, canon blows it out of the water.  But the d200..nikon did a horrible job. Most people I know who have a d200 though have only used nikon cameras. I had a friend who went from the d90 to the d200 and another who from the d40 to the d200. All of them are amazed by it, but if you have ever used a Canon and tried to go to the d200 you will see it is a utterly horrible camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawn Glison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dawn, that's complete nonsense. Both Canon and Nikon make excellent cameras that each have their own strong and weak points. One may work better for your specific needs than another, but to say that Canon "blows Nikon out of the water" is a lie.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Anonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dawn<br><br>thanks for sharing your opinion. If it's such a horrible camera as you say, how did Nikon sell so many? (that's a rhetorical question)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Canon/Nikon... Dude I shoot Canon, but not because it's better than nikon but because I "like it better" for me.<br><br>Your angle is the same lame angle of every "fanboi" of cars, consoles, cola, computer makes, colonic irrigation...<br><br>Personally I think the 720p is a bit average for such an expensive body.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cy Starkman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dawn Gilson,<br>I've been shooting with the D200 for the past 2 years. You show me yours and I will show you mine.<br>And my Dad can beat your Dad.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cajie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dawn<br><br>you are obviously not a photographer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bladey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 5:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[dayum!  $51,995.95]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fatima]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would accept this as a Christmas gift.  Thank you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Collin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[$5,1995.95<br><br>what kind of math is this? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[reddsharkk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's higher math. Duh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bionictulip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[At one point--it's nice. At the other, 12MP? Really? Shouldn't a $5200 DSLR body have something more to offer? I know the whole "megapixels doesn't mean everything" line, which is true for most people. However, if I'm paying $5200 for a body, you bet I'll want more resolution for printing huge posters/photos, etc. <br><br>Are you going to say to your client..."Sorry, my $5200 camera can't print that large?"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jdlongenecker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's something called the D3X for that reason. The D3 is more suited for action photography. Hence the 14 FPS burst rate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[synn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[to do huge prints what you really want is a medium format size camera. That's in the territory of the legendary Hasselblad and Mamiya. <a href="http://www.letsgodigital.org/images/artikelen/73/hasselblad_h3d_camera_zoom.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.letsgodigital.org/images/artikelen/73/hasselblad_h3d_camera_zoom.jpg</a><br><br>Need bigger? go with view cameras.<br><a href="http://media.smithsonianmag.com/images/388*387/indelible_mainmay05.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://media.smithsonianmag.com/images/388*387/indelible_mainmay05.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WinMo_is_trash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[$1,000,000 cameras don't make prints either. Printers make prints. ;)<br><br>but seriously, each camera is designed for specific tasks. Just like a Corvette isn't designed for the family of 5. The D3 and D3S are designed for low-light situations and sports photography. On the otherhand, the D3X has the 21MP sensor so it is designed around shooting in the studio and so forth where plenty of light is available and big prints are needed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[This camera is meant for professional photographers.  That is why you do not understand why a 12mp camera cost $5000.  I would take this camera over anything else out there right now as a wedding photographer.  There is really nothing better for that business, now a D700s would be nice as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Boostjunkie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[@boostjunkie<br><br>When shooting a wedding professionally, there's two kinds of situations: the formals and the other stuff. For the other stuff, yeah this looks like it would do the job extremely nicely. However, for the formals which have controlled lighting, it makes *much* more sense to take advantage of medium format film, i.e. Portra 160NC, because the prints will be much nicer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wickedpheonix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[@EM1  nicely put.. but the just to correct, the D3x is over 24MP  :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bladey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 6:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[12 megapixels is fine for "huge posters and prints"<br><br>Let me put things in perspective for you, if you have a jpeg (at the oh-so inferior 72 dpi) and its native resolution was an equivalent to 16x20 inches. You can resize that 30% larger (with bicubic and other built in algorithms in most graphics programs) before real people will notice. So now your print is native 20.8x26 without any tricks.<br><br>Now imagine if your source image was the much more desirable 300 dpi with a now native resolution of 20.8x26 , you COULD drop the resolution down to 72 and have an image more than twice as large, simply because the inches are being counted differently by your computer and by printers. Now your image is 50x62 inches. What applications would you use that for? Would you stand up close to it looking for image artifacts, I mean it is a jpeg after all... And regardless, real people won't notice.<br><br>Now lets say you were doing things right from the beginning, you were shooting RAW with your 12 megapixel DSLR (instead of your 12 or 14 megapixel point and shoot) and you had the opportunity to save the image in a format that didn't produce compression artifacts as jpeg does. Now you manage to take your 12 megapixel image to those same 50x62 dimensions, while viewing it from at least 4 or 6 feet away, and you REALLY think, in the back of your mind that Nikon (or anyone else for that matter) should have pushed more megapixels in there?<br><br>That is without doing any tricks in post, like an unsharp mask, or noise ninja, or anything.<br><br>Just trying to provide some insight, 12 is all you need and they should stop including it in the specs. It is kind of like how Pentium 2 processors used to come with "MMX" and having the "MMX" version was a premium. All processors come with MMX but they don't keep telling you about it with fancy stickers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neofolklore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2009 8:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of course it's not going to have image stabilization; it's a Nikon. It may use Vibration Reduction (VR) but that is built into the lenses not the body.<br><br>BTW, it's still full-frame, right?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope they update the D3 firmware to give some of the same features as the S.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, they won't. Not a chance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA["but as far as we can tell there's still no image stabilization."<br><br>Call it a hunch, but this may be because Nikon adds Vibration Reduction (Image stabilization) to its lenses rather than bodies.<br><br>/sarcasm<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[synn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[They're saying that there's no VR support in video mode.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wait, maybe not... that sentence reads two different ways.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[VR works in both photo and video mode.<br><br>I don't see why this would matter anyway. Any semi-decent video would be shot on a tripod (With pre-determined focus distances; which is the reason why the lack of continuous AF doesn't bother pros as much as it does  the internet). Use your cellphone or P&S if you want to be cocooned in automatic settings.<br><br>Still don't care about video on a DSLR anyway. Give me a decently priced, slow burst D700X instead. Sony got the equation right with the Alpha 850.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[synn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[So it's a capital S?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Einhanderkiller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why would they put image stabilization into the camera body when they've already been building it into their lenses for several years? Ross doesn't seem to know much about Nikon cameras.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Anonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because then your nice f/1.4 lenses would be stabilized?<br><br>Say it with me: Nikon put VR in SOME of their lenses. Some.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 2:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[The point is, anyone who knows anything about Nikon already knows they've moved to a model where features such as IS and AF are built into the lenses rather than the camera body. And any glass Nikon has released recently includes VR, particularly since it became a standard and highly sought feature. You can keep your useless attitude.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Anonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2009 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[  With this camera.. You can see where Nikon is headed with the entire videographer segment.  Not playing to it at all.  Now before every one of you photographers downvote me and scream " if you want a video camera, get a video camera" you need to realize where the industry is heading and that it is a huge segment.  Features Films, Commercials, News,  and TV are all starting to be shot with these DSLRs.   I was just on set a week ago with 3 Cameras being used and not for B roll. The Canon cameras are pushing the envelope for "HD film look" without paying for a $100k video body and soon the Red system will push this format further.  Once you mount a dslr in rails with a mic, it is much easier to handle than a pro video camera that in most instances you will get better quality from the DSLR.<br><br>  When Canon makes it's announcement for the 1dMkIV later this month we will really see where they are headed.  At this point, all the rumors are looking like the 1dMkIV will have much better video specs than the 7d and 5d Mk2 combined, meanwhile Nikon is not competing in this high end video market.  I love Nikon, but they are just not competing.   Video and Photos together in one body is the future whether you like it or not.  It will become ubiquitous much the same way digital cameras have become.  People said film would never die... well it hasn't, but it really is a niche now.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tracknod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[I work in a rental house. We cannot keep the 5D Mark II in stock. I would say nearly half the rentals are going towards video shooting.<br>There are some kinks to work out but I like having a still camera and a video camera in one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah I'm really amazed that Nikon is dropping the ball so badly when it comes to video. One would think that without a video camera line and being the first DSLR to feature video recording, they would have really been pushing this feature and improving upon it.<br><br>I'm really happy that Canon is making such great headway here. But I fear that come next round without any competition from Nikon, Canon will begin to slack.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Miachael...  It isn't Nikon Canon is competing with in this market... It is Red.  Red will push the grounds, no doubt about it keeping Canon on their toes (or at least I hope). ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tracknod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would agree on the video I'm not sure why they don't have 1080p in such a high end camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[macjonny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where what industry is playing? Most of those rentals are going to be from budget-constrained people, i.e. those who will be shooting their college theses. Anybody who wants the "real thing" is going to stick with the expensive stuff - don't try and sell me on the idea that the next Universal or Warner Brothers film will be shot on a 5DMkII. In fact, in those segments, shooting has already moved to 4k and beyond to prepare for the next generation of release formats, just as soon as consumer technology becomes affordable enough.<br><br>The 5DMkII and similar cameras for video work cater to the indy/academic segments and are thus firmly niche products. If Nikon can spend it's resources making a better camera that serves to a larger segment - artists, wedding photographers, sports photographers, hobbyists, photojournalists - ANY kind of photographer, then they've catered to a larger market than Canon has and that is a good business strategy.<br><br>If Canon comes out with a 1DsMkIV that has even 2k capture, it's not going to matter when/if the body can only support ISO 1600 cleanly because Canon decided to cram 20 MP into the sensor - no *photographer* would buy it if they had an easy choice between the 1DsMkIV and the D3/S.<br><br>This isn't to say that Canon shouldn't make such a camera - there's enough room in Canon's lineup to support a video-focused professional camera as well as a more traditionally focused one. But don't lambast Nikon for not working to put in a feature that a good many of us still consider to be a worthless consumer gimmick.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wickedpheonix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 2:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wickedpheonix...  And you spoke just like a true photographer.  You are obviously a pro so let me ask you this; 7 years ago, were you one of those pros saying I will never shoot with a digital camera that it is a worthless consumer gimmick.  The IQ will never be better than film?  Now... Your hard pressed finding a studio shooting with film at all. <br><br>   And no... DP's are switching to these cameras. Numerous worldwide commercials, news agencies, and TV are all using them.  And yes like I said, even film.  Hell, SNL is using them.  Did you watch PBS to and see the new doc on Afghanistan that aired?  Oh yeah.. that was a DSLR.  Not to mention all the shows in production.   EVERYTHING is budget these days, and If a DP can get the same quality with a rig costing 10k compared to 150k, where do you think they will go.<br><br>   Consumer... yeah, that is it.  Keep telling yourself that as you are shooting with 1600 ISO Fujichrome, oh yeah.. your not shooting with that anymore because something better came along.  Sorry to tell you this, but your beloved "picture" only dslr will be no more.  Just remember how you felt about digital cameras not so long ago.  <br><br>   I never "lambasted" Nikon, I just said they either don't have the technology or are obviously, just not trying to ply in this field.  A field that will become very profitable.  Plus, the fact that they do include video, but a subpar quality would let one think it could be a technology issue.  Canon is bringing in an entirely new group of people into the pro DSLR market. People that wouldn't have purchased a camera otherwise. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tracknod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 2:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[The [S] stands for Speed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Teslanaut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, it stand for second issue.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maxfli82]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 2:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[no it stands for SUPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPA]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bladey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 6:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the D700 and a nice collection of lenses.  Nothing here makes me want to jump.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[craig.betteridge]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br><br>Why all of the nastiness from the Cannon crowd?<br><br>It's a product not a religion.  Geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[craig.betteridge]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is the internet. Having anything less than total blind commitment to or against every product on the market is SO nineties.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Anonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[OMG, 3 of the nearly 30 replies are Canon releated! Head for the hills, the fanboys are coming out of the closet!! Bit of a drama queen????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 12:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because a large portion of the SLR market are insecure dorks and/or inexperienced photographers who feel compelled to defend their own purchasing decision ad infinitum.<br><br>This is why no one should ever take gear buying advice from commenters and forum users.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 2:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, we've had this leak for a while now... a few weeks ago -- as did Nikon Rumours. Of course, it being this early is unprecedented... predicted specs nearly all correct. <br><br>Looks like a stunner.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CameraTech]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2009 6:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amazing camera!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/nikon-d3s-is-officially-official-bringing-its-iso-extremes-in-l/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is really interesting that Nikon is pushing the limits of low light sensitivity.  I have a Canon 5dII and I find the low light sensitivity more than enough.  It seems this camera will almost see in the dark though and will allow for some really interesting shots.  It is nice that there are different cameras now for different needs.  For me, shooting landscape or portrait photos I am often shooting and low ISOs and I would rather have the high MP and ability to crop and preserve resolution.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[macjonny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 14th 2009 1:13AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
