<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[I still think that Android looks dated.  Compared to the snazzy HTC Sense UI, this looks like a standard boring desktop with icons on it.  Even with the widgets, I'm still looking forward to picking up an HTC Android device!  Of course, I have a BB Storm right now and am DYING to get rid of this piece of crap!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 16th 2009 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[They just need to enable multitouch and I'm happy. Works pretty well on the Hero, but it'd be nice if it was supported across the board on Android.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hughesw2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 16th 2009 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[From reading the article on BGR they haven't enabled multitouch on 2.0 *yet* which is a bit disappointing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taknarosh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 16th 2009 4:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[I know what you mean.. I am running a very fast Hero ROM on my HTC Magic with multitouch.. the hardware is capable.. it just has to be enabled, but still glad I didnt pay extra money on a Hero just to have an extra 1.8mp camera and a dedicated headset jack (for which I have a 69 cent adapter).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2009 4:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still don't see why so many people keeping talking about Android like it's so great. I guess it works for you all though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 16th 2009 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's because it IS great. Looking at just the phone's OS and not third-party apps, Android blows everything else out the water. For instance the widget desktop is a million times more usable than the iPhone's retarded "thousands of icons in rows" desktop.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[greenlight]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2009 6:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[U will Soon Get Consumed. What Platform are u for?...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Art]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2010 7:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[When I see this version on a phone with a 3.5" screen & a 5 mega-pixel screen I'm going back to Android. I loved my G1 but with its underpowered processor, the freaking small 3.2" screen & a 2 mp camera I just couldn't take it any longer so I sold it & went to an iphone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lancelot9201]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 17th 2009 9:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA["When I see this version on a phone with a 3.5" screen & a 5 mega-pixel screen I'm going back to Android" -- if you mean a 5MP camera, then it looks like Droid is what you're looking for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Stracke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 19th 2009 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[does anyone feel like T-mobile gets beasted every time they try to come out with a phone, especially dealing with android, by another phone company. first its the hero, and now its the droid on Verizon! T-mobile just reallly needs to step their game up!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 19th 2009 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Greg. I also have a HTC Magic Taiwan bought. I am running a Hero ROM. I find it a little lagging on certain apps compared to the stock HTC Android 1.5 OS I had before. Which ROM do you use ? Does your A2DP work ?<br><br>I also have an iPhone and am sick of no multitasking that Android has. I like to know I have tweets now, not everytime I open the app. Skype although a Beta stays open in the background to receive Skype calls. I do not want to receive a push message telling me someone is calling as on iPhone. Apple needs to let apps run in background. And Android is open source. iPhone still wins app battle, but not for long I presume.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[socalphil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 19th 2009 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Android 2.0 given a once-over, makes 1.6 look a little dated]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/16/android-2-0-given-a-once-over-makes-1-6-look-a-little-dated/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is a cool phone]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a1meskel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2009 9:13PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
