<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[About time AMD. Intel was getting lonely and not to mention complacent with the mediocre Atom...<br><br>Hopefully these will live up to expectations, if there are any. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BeeQAL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 8:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bout time Atom has some more competition.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfticket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[They really need to stop announcing them so early. I've been hearing about this for almost 2 years now, and I think it's already old.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[The title should have been:<br>AMD's Congo to officially fail next month like every other AMD project since Intel's core duo chips.<br>Intel to pay one more billion penalty, cause it's ok for monopoly companies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 8:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[It should have read: Intel killed another superior AMD product with its strong arm and blackmail tactics.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gungel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 8:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or just by having a bigger marketing budget that turns people into mindless drones that will buy anything with their logo in it, and defend it even if it is evidently worse (wait, where did I heard this before?).<br>Thing is, just because AMD doesn't have the top of the top in performance, doesn't mean AMD can't excel at mainstream or budget prices or even surpass the competition at the same price range.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blue Ion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 10:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[And they would have had top performance CPUs too if more people bought their chips when they were the cheaper, cooler, and faster product, but intel managed to somehow make people buy their shitty Pentiums instead]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[The big advantage of this platform is the ATI chipset that's required for this platform. It simply blows away any Intel Atom offering in graphics performance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gungel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 8:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[So true]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[duggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[Die!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dahis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[But aren't thin notebooks (super netbooks?) limited by MS' refusal of allowing Windows to run on low-power dual-core laptops (Atom/Neo CPUs)? Or are 11-12 inch devices not legally considered netbooks per se, and don't need to comply with that legal constraint?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crsh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 9:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lets just say, big computer makers can put.... "pressure" to go above the limit...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brainy142]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 9:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[They aren't going to be running Windows 7 Starter, so there is no limit. That's why it's important to know the difference between a netbook and a "thin and light". The former is supposed to be extremely cheap, the latter will be around $400-600, take some sacrifices in performance compared to a normal notebook, but come in a very compelling form factor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagamer43]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 9:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not a 'legal' requirement, it's just a qualification you must meet to get Windows Starter.<br><br>These ultraportables will either run Home Premium or Professional. They are not netbooks, I believe they are a inbetween full fledged performance chip and the weaksauce that Atom is. Something to compete with the Core 2 Duo ULV CPUs. They will be cheap, much faster than an Atom an should have low overall power consumption.<br><br>This is pretty much what I have been waiting for, a cheap C2D ULV in an 11-12" form factor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daza]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 9:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[iirc to get the low cost "netbook" oem price on XP .. i.e. Microsoft gives it to you for free to stop you installing Linux on it, the machine had to be single core, and there may have also been a screen size and HDD size limit too.<br><br>I think all this "lack of consumer demand" is a smokescreen and the real reason is all about Windows 7. These ultrathins would not qualified for the netbook  XP oem price, and putting Vista on them would have been expensive and given relatively poor performance. Once everything from netbooks on up run Win7 and scaling properly in price/performance, the 11" dual core "super netbook" makes much more sense.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 10:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't the Acer Ferrari One based on this platform? They plan on selling their laptop on Oct. 22nd!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagamer43]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[So once again we have a choice between terrible performance(atom), and terrible battery life(anything by AMD). <br><br>Intel, would you launch Arrandale already?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it just me or is Engadget about 5 months late?  I own an HP dv2-1100z, and have owned it for little less than four months.  It has the Turion Neo X2 L625.  I also bought my wife an HP dv2-1100z with the Athlon Neo X2 L335.  I wanted to buy the original with the Athlon Neo MV-40, but decided to wait for the X2 versions.  Bought it for $700 after a %30 discount.<br><br>Here's my specs:<br>HP dv2-1100z<br>4 GB ram single DIMM<br>200 GB Seagate HDD 7200 rpm ( aftermarket, original was a 320 GB WD 5400 rpm )<br>12.1" screen<br>ATI Mobility Radeon 3300 HD Discrete GPU wit HDMI<br>Bluetooth and Wi-fi<br><br>I play "The Witcher" (low gfx details but plays nonetheless) and web development on it.<br>I didn't get the Blu-Ray player because it's complete overkill on this size of a screen, but now am considering it since the HDMI works beautifully.  So yeah. . . . Engadget is about 5-6 months late.  But i absolutely love my laptop with the Turion Neo X2 L625 and my wife couldn't be happier.  They are portable, powerful, and light.<br><br>And as far as the "Congo" AMD renamed it to "2nd Generation Ultra-Thin" due to controversy.  Just FYI Darren.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mexicano29]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 20th 2009 8:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hate to break it to ya, but it won't be in a couple of weeks, it's already out.<br><br><a href="http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9556358&type=product&id=1218123847359" rel="nofollow">http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9556358&type=product&id=1218123847359</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zshift]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well that does say pre-order not order, but the estimated arrival says 10/22-10/30]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gamechld]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 6:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure no one makes a CPU with 512 MEGABYTES of L2 cache. Also, not even HP offers a 1366x768 option in their CTO of the dm3.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagamer43]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[see comment above]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mexicano29]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2009 8:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>for the same price I would go the the DV-4 2045dx<br><br>it has the ATI 4200 which is a decent card in a laptop, not earth shaking but much better then the integrated shit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  <br><br>^^ its only 1 inch bigger in screen size. And yes they sell the laptop in your OP at bestbuy but no one buys it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[how would they compare to Atoms (just a cpu comparison, not chipset)?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceBacon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 7:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[SET YOUR CAPTCHA ON REVOLVING FREQUENCIES - THEY'RE ADAPTING!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ratkazoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 18th 2009 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's Congo platform getting really official next month?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/18/amds-congo-platform-getting-really-official-next-month/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Acer Ferrari One 200 is a myth, I swear. It's Oct 22, the supposed release date, yet I can't find a single retailer inside the US who has one available OR has it on order in their systems. Not a single website either. It's like this netbook exists in some bubble only Acer knows about. You see coverage about it from a month ago and that's it. Not a peep about it now that it is supposedly "released" what gives, Acer? I want to buy one already, geez!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tyler805]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2009 2:10AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
