http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/ Engadget Comments for Texas Instruments CC2540 promises ultra-low energy Bluetooth http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/Oct 19th 2009 7:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/]]>Oct 19th 2009 7:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/
I agree it needs to be faster though. A lot faster.]]>Oct 19th 2009 4:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/Oct 19th 2009 7:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/Oct 19th 2009 7:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/Oct 19th 2009 8:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/
Bluetooth, from an RF perspective is terrible too. It just vomits all over the 2.4Ghz spectrum, unlike 802.11b/g/n which is better behaved.]]>Oct 19th 2009 9:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/Oct 19th 2009 9:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/Oct 19th 2009 10:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/Oct 19th 2009 3:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/Oct 19th 2009 12:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/Oct 19th 2009 1:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/
Perhaps you mean 6 square millimeters? Because 6 mm-squared is 36 square millimeters, and that would be a silly way of putting things, don't you think?]]>Oct 19th 2009 3:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/19/texas-instruments-cc2540-promises-ultra-low-energy-bluetooth-vi/
Doesn't seem like it's application will be an hour long phone call or transferring movie files form a computer to a cell phone.]]>Oct 19th 2009 9:07PM