http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/ Engadget Comments for Acer neoTouch S200 reviewed, not recommended http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
what a waste of Snapdragon]]>Oct 20th 2009 11:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
How about the more likely solution - that Acer screwed up on the hardware front or have poor drivers on the software side. Neither of which are Microsoft's fault.]]>Oct 20th 2009 12:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 12:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
My WinMo 6.5 on a processor half the speed (528Mhz) runs smooth and fast with no crashes.

It goes to how the hardware is setup and the quality of the WinMo ROM used.]]>Oct 20th 2009 12:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 1:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:26AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
TouchFlo 3D is an outstanding GUI, and Sense is even better, but this Acer effort just doesn't cut it on any level.

Oh Well... Maybe next time - Acer.]]>Oct 20th 2009 11:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
I have to ask - Do you happen to own, or have you even used (at length), the HTC TouchFlo/Sense UI, or are you simply defending the phone that you currently have/are stuck with?

It's cool either way, but I find it extremely difficult to believe that any mere OS update could compensate for the Treo Pro's rather archaic little 320 x 320 display in the face of HTC's far more advanced 800 x 480 unit at 3.75 times the resolution.

But - Hey! As long as you're happy...]]>Oct 20th 2009 12:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/ Overheating iPhones
Faulty magsafe chargers (pin springs are poorly designed)
Magsafe leads melting
Noisy Macbook pro HDDs

I'm sure you love the taste of Steve Job's ass but really any complex computer item has it's problems, it's a matter of how quickly a company fixes and admits to them.]]>Oct 20th 2009 11:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
It's open from 9am to 9pm...that's 12 hours...72 ten minute slots...booked solid for 3 days? the people who had shown up for their slot were STILL waiting as they ran over. It's ALWAYS like that I'm told.]]>Oct 20th 2009 11:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
I'm sure all those instances were just the Apple products protecting their owners from doing something stupid and destroying the world.

Apple: Whatever it takes.]]>Oct 20th 2009 3:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/i wish all windows phone go away except that one.
NO other windows phone is even worth mentioning.
everything else just makes us look bad.
why...why...
THE TOUCH HD2 HAS A CAPACITIVE SCREEN.]]>Oct 20th 2009 11:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 12:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
I'm one who likes having options, and a well done 'resistive' touch screen gives me just that - the option of using either a finger or a stylus.

The stylus comes in extremely handy when wearing gloves, inputting any large amount of numerical data in a spreadsheet (Hey! it's happened), or when I tire of smudging up the display.

Of course, I've only discovered one phone with a truly well-done 'resistive' display - The HTC Imagio.

It's every bit as accurate as my iPhone's capacitive screen, lacking only multi-touch, which I seldom use or care about anyway since all it does is smudge up the screen.

Choice is Always Good - IMO]]>Oct 20th 2009 12:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:38AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
http://www.telemoveis.com/catalog/item.asp?id=339 (1999)


]]>Oct 20th 2009 11:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 11:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/Oct 20th 2009 12:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
I really hope that acer learn quickly and make sure their android A1 is not under-baked, i really want that phone to be great!

Next year will be make or break for WinMo as android get stronger...........
]]>Oct 20th 2009 12:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/20/acer-neotouch-s200-reviewed-not-recommended/
I'm assuming that WinMo haters will also be denouncing Android if it doesn't run well on the A1? You know, condemn the software and not the phone (despite the fact that Android runs fine on other devices).]]>Oct 20th 2009 12:30PM