<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[i cant wait till bangbros gets a hold of these]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iroydude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pervert.<br><br>You got my vote.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol...you have my vote.<br><br>SP]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EminiSP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[The chick or the camera?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you wait one or two months when this comes out, the price cut will be 50%... definitely a waste of money for the quality that you wont even tell a difference if the the photo was taken with New Nikon or Canon...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Serge]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have to agree]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason51873]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[This isn't for the same market as a Nikon or Canon.  These are large format cameras, mostly used in studio modeling work and things like that.  It's not something any normal consumer needs to worry about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Boostjunkie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really hate when people open their pie hole about stuff they know nothing about. This is a professional studio sensor. What makes this thing awesome is not the 22 megapixels. It is the SIZE of the sensor itself, and its dynamic range! This will absolutely destroy any Canon or Nikon in image quality. Nikon and Canon are not in the professional studio market. They make great stuff..(I'm a Nikon guy myself)...but medium format sensors provide much better detail...much better contrast. Much more film like than your standard APS-C or Full Frame 35mm Sensor. I have used similar equipment in school many times. There IS a difference.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Mahoney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[There is "IS" Difference!? Really? ... Where? Under a Microscope!!?? ... Ryan, i agree, it is probably a good camera, but paying all those money for something you would barely notice, its insane! For 10,000$ you can buy a lot of equipment. You can almost build a photo studio, or buy a MAD amount of lenses! Good ones!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Serge]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA["Where? Under a Microscope!!??" <br><br>Actually, yes. Or maybe if you blow up the image to billboard size, or gallery size, say a 40"x60" portrait, the difference is clear. The size of the sensors on medium format backs are twice that (or more) of a full-frame DSLR, which means that images taken on them can be reproduced at large sizes with much less noise and grain. Serge, just because you don't need the quality doesn't mean that it's pointless/superfluous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're a moron. This is not for regular consumers like you and me. This is for studio photographers who need to print on something larger than what is practical.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vun is a biter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can anybody link me to a full-size image from a medium format camera?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Einhanderkiller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 11:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.phaseone.com/Content/Case%20Studies/Deep%20Zoom%20Gallery.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.phaseone.com/Content/Case%20Studies/Deep%20Zoom%20Gallery.aspx</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2009 5:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[overkill.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great song by Colin Hay. Especially the Scrubs soundtrack version.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BPilch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 9:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Serge: Sir, have you every even used or at least seen a Leaf digital camera back in real life ? Or are you just another generic "canon/nikon/bullshit is tah bestz and all teh others sux" guy who dont knows shit ? Most of the recent dslr's are like toy cameras compared to this one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Corvi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Corvi<br><br>Dude are you insane? It doesn't matter how good your camera is, if you get the right setting and a good shot with any DSLR? You will still  go through post-production like Photoshoppin the shit of the image with Color Balancing, Exposure, Levels, Curves etc... And than you make the image look good! But if you take this camera, set up wrong settings and take a crappy shot, it still be a crappy shot! But hey!? you'll be 10K$ short, so go buy it man! I am not arguing, it's just people who does photography only less than 1% can afford to buy it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Serge]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Neither of you guys knows what you are talking about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Boostjunkie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Boostjunkie: Mhm .. And you know that. Actually im using a Hasselblad CFV II back for quite some time now. Next to that, i still shoot on film for purposes where i think not even that will be sufficient. My personal stuff are all shot on film with Leica cameras. I would say i know what i talk about if i say that every dslr can dig his own grave next to even this "cheap" MF digital back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Corvi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2009 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[In before someone complains about it not being able to take video.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ehisforadam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that ISO range correct?  25-400?  Are you not allowed to take pictures unless the sun is shining down at noon in the California desert?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MacGyver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is mostly for studio use. I'd be very surprised if any one would bring it out to the California desert.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[the real macgyver wouldnt need ISO range. he'd roundhouse the earth's rotation till it was noon wherever he wanted it to be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 6:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@alex<br>I'm pretty sure you are thinking of Chuck Norris.  MacGyver would use gum, a paper clip, and a portable fan to alter the earths rotation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok...it's literally just the back of a camera...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, but you get a picture of a hot girl with it.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kempcross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is actually not a bad price at all... it's medium format, not 35mm.  The Nikon D3x is nearly as much.<br>There are many medium-format backs that cost well over $40,000.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[noot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 4:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[When mentioning the touch screen, it appears "stylus required" is a side note.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 5:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Definitely for a niche market.  It has a low ISO capabilities because it is intended for use in a studio with all the studio lighting you could want.  You are not going to be using this to shoot a football game at night in the rain.  Although with a sensor that size, I'll bet it does okay in lower light anyways. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ithurtswhenipee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 6:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[The highest mpix system I know of is this: <a href="http://www.pdngearguide.com/gearguide/content_display/reviews/e3i4fc650632bff09aca61b17991619d45c" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdngearguide.com/gearguide/content_display/reviews/e3i4fc650632bff09aca61b17991619d45c</a><br><br>60.5 megapixels...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tosvus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 6:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hassleblad > Leaf. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 8:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Leaf = Phaseone \ Hasselblad = pwned]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 23rd 2009 5:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only person that noticed that it's actually 1.11 fps? They quote 0.9 seconds per frame, a unit of measurement that's more useful for still image photography.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 9:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Leaf announces new Aptus-II 22 megapixel camera back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/22/leaf-announces-new-aptus-ii-22-megapixel-camera-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is weak.. and not because of fps or iso (its not meant for sports photography!).  The dynamic range is an increase of 2 stops over your typical sensor in high end 35mm digital slrs, but they cost considerably less.   But what about resolution?  Fail.   The table below shows what you need for film equivalents - in b&w.  Color x 3<br><br>Films and their approximate Digital MegaPixel equivalents<br>  Calculated @ 107 lines/mm film resolution for the interested photographer!  <br><br> 35mm -                 24  X 36  X 11574 =    10,000,000 =   10 MegaPixels<br> 645    medium format - 60  X 45  X 11574 =    31,249,999 =   31 MegaPixels<br> 6X7    medium format - 60  X 70  X 11574 =    48,611,111 =   48 MegaPixels<br> 6x9    medium format - 60  X 90  X 11574 =    62,499,999 =   62 MegaPixels<br> 4X5" (Inch) Film  -    102 X 127 X 11574 =   149,930,555 =  149 MegaPixels<br> 8X10" (Inch) Film   -  203 X 254 X 11574 =   596,782,407 =  597 MegaPixels<br> 11X14" (Inch) Film  -  279 X 356 X 11574 = 1,149,583,333 = 1.15 GigaPixels<br><br>from here: <a href="http://spotmetering.com/35mm-digital/" rel="nofollow">http://spotmetering.com/35mm-digital/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beezle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2009 10:32PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
