<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[You mean we just need another 5 months to go from slow to slow+?  Sign me up!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean O]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[so true.<br><br>I want a 10" netbook, but I also want a (non-crippled) modern OS, and I want it to be able to dock to my home theatre and do HD output.<br><br>bah.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crawdad689]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Then put Home Premium/Professional on it. No one's stopping you. <br><br>And Engadget: there was never any licensing restriction saying you couldn't put Home Premium/Professional/Business/Pro/whatever other oversion you wanted to on your netbooks; you absolutely could assuming you or your OEM were willing to pay the additional costs, which most OEMs weren't.<br>What you couldn't and still can't do is put Vista Home Basic/7 Starter on proper laptops/PCs (although I don't see why you'd want to).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank you Mark.  I've seen them make this mistake a few times. You would think they would get it right at some point.  And just to add to what you said...<br><br>It isn't INTEL that prevents more than 1gb of ram in netbooks.  Microsoft prevents more than 1gb of memory in netbooks that contain Windows xp or Windows 7 Starter.  If the manufacturer puts Windows 7 Premium on it, they can put as much memory on it as they want.<br><br>Netbooks are perfect for what they are made for- for people that are traveling that don't want to take their regular laptop to check email/surf the net/write a letter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2009 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[My VAIO P has an Atom chip and 2GB of RAM.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John McKee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel can't dictate to hardware manufacturers what they can put in their systems, but they can discourage it.  Like Microsoft they offer different prices to manufacturers who conform to their system specs.  So we get a slew of identical machines from 90% of netbook makers with a handful of higher priced machines, like your VAIO P, that buck the trend.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone on Engadget has a Vaio P?  Please tell me you got it for free, otherwise I will have lost all faith in humanity.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamokazi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[The VAIO P uses a Z series Atom, though, which has no such restrictions, and never has had such restrictions - it's not meant for netbooks, it's meant for MIDs and UMPCs, and is therefore considered a premium product, not a budget product.<br><br>(Also, the Z series is coupled with the US11/15 chipset, which has much less power consumption, although it's crippled in other ways, and has poor driver support for non-Windows OSes.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bhtooefr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[OR, we can just use the VIA Nano + ION or VIA Trinity platforms.<br><br>Better perf, greener practices, better specs.<br><br>Hrm...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ritarded09]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, the new tech does use significantly less power... and Intel has done the "die shrink Dothan and underclock the crap out of it" trick a couple times. The end result was chips that had more power consumption and were slower than Atom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bhtooefr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not only that, but RoHS and other industrial standards that we apply now in manufacturing processes leave us with products that have less environmental and health effects and can make them potentially more recyclable.<br><br>But yes, if we cut our production way back we'd be using less. However, we have to meet demand to continue to grow. Whether or not we should be allowed to grow any further is a question I'm not willing to answer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ritarded09]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 10:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have an HP Mini 311 with ION and 3 gigs of DDR 3 ram and am pretty satisfied with it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Red Monkey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have been considering it, The Red Monkey, but when I compare it to, say, the HP Dm3t I keep leaning towards the Dm instead of the Mini 311. At just a tad larger, the Dm comes equipped with a core2duo and a beefier graphics card. Plus it is made of aluminum. I am still on the fence, but I am also having to consider the price. The Mini 311 specced the way I want comes out to $660ish while the Dm comes out to approximately $900. What to do...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Conceyted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Mini is my portable. I have two very capable desktops so it really depends on need. I don't game, mainly school and work related use for travel so the small size was great. I went for the 1.66 upgrade with N and bluetooth. Order the ram and hard drive outside of HP as they will be cheaper and you can get a 7200 RPM drive.<br><br>I vote Mini if its not your primary machine for the price. Its done everything I need and with flash going to the GPU soon it will work even better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Red Monkey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its gonna be on the outside of the case??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[total.destroyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[:)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[CULV ftw!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Soulsaber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[The CULV may test higher than the Atom but they pair it with crap graphics making an ION powered Netbook a better buy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Red Monkey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 3:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hooray for Intel and Microsoft, with their cockblocking! Without them, who knows what kind of horribly fast and feature-packed netbooks we'd be forced to purchase. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let me guess, these will only be available in a 12" or higher form-factor.<br><br>This isn't a netbook, it's an under-powered laptop.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hexydes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[they don't want to cannibalize their laptop sales. don't be h8n]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tym]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 2:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[I see a window of opportunity here for AMD & VIA...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stalkythefish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA["Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further"<br><br>slightly further? LOLWUT?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Joker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why? Netbooks don't need >1GB of ram, as they shouldn't be running an OS [read-vista] that requires it to not run worse than a fat kid. All netbooks need which many have is not intel integrated graphics. This is a problem. Ion and other platforms remedy it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Art]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 4:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[As if there ever were more than like 3 netbooks that even ran Vista...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 5:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who is rather happy with my netbook's performance? <br><br>Sure, it's no gaming machine, but it actually runs things very well. Granted, I upgraded it to 2GB of RAM, and if I need it I send the Atom into overclock mode, but I haven't done that much to it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darth Bradwart, Dark Lord of the Sith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 11:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[BIOS update for legacy models, do want.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2009 9:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Next-gen Atom N470 to relax netbook spec restrictions slightly further]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/next-gen-atom-n470-to-relax-netbook-spec-restrictions-slightly-f/</guid><description><![CDATA[A hardware restriction implemented in hardware, wouldn't that suck. I wonder what will happen here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2009 9:53PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
