<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[What?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yadiel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Twits]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Monkey with glasses]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[If I'm away from Twitter for more than 5 minutes I start getting seizures.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spiraling Shape]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[wait, what?<br><br>Why show email in the device on the box. I call BS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[these peek tweet people are genius]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not sure about a Twitter only device, but adding Twitter to the current peak seems to be a no brainer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon Sharitt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 8:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sweet! Now I have a device for twittering which will go really well with the Peek I use for email and my cell phone which is just for calling. Now I just need them to design a Peek for bloggers and I will have the 4 not-cumbersome-at-all devices I need to keep connected. Who needs Android?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NikAmi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 11:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I twatted this news all over the place once I got it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valicore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 11:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is too much people! i still don't see what the fuss is all about regarding twitter!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phandy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your comment could have 49 more exclamation marks and still be within the Twitter limit!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Like this?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shadow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 9:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[@phandy: You should Twitter that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NikAmi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[My head hurts just thinking about how outrageous this is. Ow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[And I'm a Sicilian.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your avatar and your first comment go great together. <br><br>+ million]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well this looks incredibly useless. Why not add this to the current Peak in order to make it more of a value rather than creating two pretty useless devices?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MR_COW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 11:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because I don't want email, I want twitter! email can wait, twitter changes/updates too fast for me to keep track of it over long periods without access - i normally use my iDevice but it's battery barely lasts a day, presumably the Peek lasts longer.<br><br>Ah, but alas, i live in Australia. Land of the free, and home of the chinese.<br><br>--neg]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2009 8:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[How stupid.<br><br>I hope whoever buys this falls down a manhole ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gillan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[But who's manhole?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA["But who's manhole?"<br><br>Oh! Behave!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[weirdo123098]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not if someone tweets him location of manhole.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Monkey with glasses]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm manhole, daniel, and for the record I do not allow anybody to "fall down" me no matter what ridiculous devices they purchase.  It really wouldn't be possible, anyway.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phrank]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2009 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[THEN WHO WAS MANHOLE?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 28th 2009 8:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[* Goes to address bar<br>* Types "ebay.com", Enter<br>* Types "smart phone"<br>* Amazed at cheap devices that can do Twitter<br><br>Hmm... who knew...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bondsbw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, bye bye now. <br><br>24/7 Twitter access is not important enough to ANYONE to have a dedicated device.  Surely they can't have done any research.  Or am I really, really missing something here?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marmite Turkey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gear of the year for WIRED magazine? I'm not surprised, they've done some poor calls before. One example would be one of their writers saying Cuba will have a tech boom, which is a joke, but go ahead, bet on it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[>Dedicated Twitter device<br><br>No.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michas_pi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think, at least here, we can come to that consesus.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ehru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 10:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Twitter is only really popular among the young. The young are a pretty shitty market because they are fickle. Everyone left MySpace for Facebook. Facebook doesn't have too long until something else comes along that everyone switches to because "Facebook is SOOO two years ago". Twitter will suffer the same fate. If they priced this at $49 + a few bucks a month for service, I could see it being popular among teens. However, I don't think any parents (and let's be honest--that's who will be paying for these things) are going to drop $200 for "lifetime service" that their kid isn't going to be using two years from now, if even two months.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's where you are wrong...<br>Even teens hate Twitter!<br>Only celebrities use it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rockey04]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really? Young people like twitter? Ha! What young people are you talking about? Young people would buy this? They (and I) would just use a cell phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Penguin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was under the impression Twitter was for older people....like those in their 30s. I'm 20 and friends with many tech-fluent people and I don't know anyone outside of my older sister (a music blogger) who uses it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Streetfights]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[meh...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff R]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[FAIL<br><br>whoops wrong website.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[navyasw02]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Twitter is completely idiotic and pointless. That makes this second-order completely idiotic and pointless.<br><br>I think this was a big step in the wrong direction for a company that was having trouble getting people to buy a device that could only read emails.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jedidove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[ahahahahaha this is one of the worst ideas i've ever heard]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncontrol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 6:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have to admit that they've picked a pretty easy mark.  CNN just reported that Ashton Kutcher just tweeted that he's going to buy one of these.  Line up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FitFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[whats really scary is i can't tell if you are joking or not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they really want this to sell, they'd keep all the features of the standard Peek device. I can understand paying for everything, but just twitter? I just don't see that working out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[200 bucks for a single-point-of-usability product?<br><br>...what's the catch?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CH3BURASHKA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its no more ridiculous than the 259 dollar Kindle.<br><br>If this does Twitter really well, I could see it being popular with people that don't want to have a smartphone and the data plan that comes with it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lookatthepiggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is an excellent idea.  Too bad too many people are unable to separate the functionality of Twitter and how Twitter is being used (as is evident by the posts here).<br><br>I can see TwitterPeek being used for stock quotes, weather, news, etc. The only downside is the $200 pricetag for "lifetime".  Not too bad if lifetime=5 years.  But if lifetime=10 months.... ouch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sracer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's hilarious how they said it was a great "stocking stufffer".<br><br>$200 for a stocking stuffer? Gimme a break.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg N.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 7:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does no one remember the "Wingman", Wired's April Fool's day joke? <br><br><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/04/video-exclusi-1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/04/video-exclusi-1/</a><br><br>This can't be real, it's patently absurd. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael H.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 8:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[grandma can stay on contact on twitter now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OmariJames]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 8:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Peek is doing Twitter? That is as bizarre as RIM creating a Blackberry wristwatch!  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Yusuf Al-Kindi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[....really? REALLY?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Art]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 9:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why all the negativity in the comments?  Do you ALL really follow the posting editor's cues that closely?<br><br>It's about the cost of just two months of a cellular data plan.  Two months.  Think about it.  Two.  Months.  <br><br>It's not a bad deal for the Twits who can't afford a data plan.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 9:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA["Lifetime service included ( or until these morons give up the fab)"<br>likely within a year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L.M.L.Y.P]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 9:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/27/the-twitterpeek-is-a-peek-for-twitter/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now if this was exclusively for using Facebook I might be interested...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Austin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 27th 2009 9:58PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
