http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/ Engadget Comments for Olympus E-P2 leaked in the most insignificant of ways http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/Oct 29th 2009 3:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/Oct 29th 2009 6:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/Oct 29th 2009 3:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/Oct 29th 2009 4:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/Oct 29th 2009 5:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/Oct 29th 2009 8:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/
Possible that E-P1 wasn't quite ready before it was launched...and E-P2 will try and "correct/fill" the gaps...?

Whatever...I wish them luck... ]]>Oct 29th 2009 3:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/
I think overall, they might make it the "faster" version of E-P1. It's gonna cost so much more though... :((]]>Oct 29th 2009 5:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/
And make it cheaper ya think?]]>Oct 29th 2009 6:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/Oct 29th 2009 6:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/Oct 29th 2009 8:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/I wouldn't be surprised if they was not a replacement, but just a different feature set, at a different price point]]>Oct 29th 2009 8:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/
In fact, here's hoping the EP2 combines the best bits of the Lumix GF1 and the EP1; with some added 720p60 video.

There, Olympus Marketing Dept., job done. My consultancy fee is in the post...]]>Oct 29th 2009 8:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/olympus-e-p2-leaked-in-the-most-insignificant-of-ways/
please please please

Much faster focus

A real codec for the 720p (1080p ?) please and the possibility to have external microphones.

can it remotely fire flash? if not get on it.

As for the rest.

Flashes are much better being external anyway make the rest of the camera good before you stuff half baked solution in the mix

The current screen is fine but more is better.

A view finder would be nice but is not necessary.]]>Oct 29th 2009 12:06PM