<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA["pudding-based proof" - awesome. Your writing alone is worth the read.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EricR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 7:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know about that.  The opening sentence has a pretty convoluted structure.  The English-language precompiler in my brain was kicking out lots of "ambiguous reference found in line 1" warnings.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anachostic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 8:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Heia Norge!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phenoum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 10:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[They would absolutely murder the market (in a good way), if they aimed this at smartphones. Especially if it didn't require any special hardware and worked with currently installed tech.<br><br>iDon't have a user-replaceable battery anyone? <br><br>/feeding the trolls.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gandhisfist]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 7:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[The trolls are waiting for pudding proof too. Your snarky comments do nothing for their appetite.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[corksean14]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 7:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[There should be an X-prize contest for battery technology. Launching rockets and space tourism is all fine and dandy but this is one goal that would impact every industrialized nation dramatically. I personally buy into the conspiracy that Big Oil has bought much of this type of technology over the years and snuffed it out to keep money flowing into their pockets. The market for new, cheap and decent battery technology is tremendous...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosdivine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 7:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, because if a company developed an awesome battery 'big oil' would buy these extremely valuable patents and then *do nothing with them*. Right. Seems likely.<br><br>I don't think there's a need for an X-Prize - the profit is prize enough.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 9:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tim, give them a little credit.  Their company name is Revolt.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 9:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Chevron owns the patents to large NiMH batteries, for the record.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignatius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would personally like to see somebody invent an engine that runs on ambient energy and see what the oil companies would do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[duggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 10:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[There are many great ideas that are ready to be commercialized; it's navigating the minefield of patents that is slowing everything down.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joquarky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  <br><br>It's already happened numerous times. Google is your friend...use it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chaosdivine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 27th 2009 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[how they be talking about going to market in 2010 before releasing prototypes?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 7:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA["Prototypes of the new battery have been tested for more than a hundred (discharge/recharge) cycles, and are expected to last at least twice as long"<br><br>Blegh.  They'll need to improve on that first.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[404]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 7:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Got a say this sounds most promising in a short term in the battery tech world i have heard.<br>Batteries in mobile/smartphones have been the same for ages while features have gone up there. N95-1 being good example in 2006 ;)<br>This is needed and i hope we actually see this soon rather than just talks about it like all the previous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pdexter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[hahaha....   I also came in to just give a kudo for the phrase "pudding-based proof"....<br><br>... but too I would like to offer some defense of that industry by saying ... "eneloop"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 8:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[A lack of recharge cycles won't matter much, if they become cheap and easily recyclable. As zinc-air batteries are.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Liam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 8:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[ReVolting?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TimmyRaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 8:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[no]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yode]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Revolt, revolting?! That is an awesome freaking name for the company. Kudos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yellowperil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 9:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is a horrible name.  Just because you can make a pun, does not mean that you should.  And it certainly doesn't mean you should use it as your corporate identity.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn s]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[We hear you "glenn s".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Most battery tech never pans out for one simple reason, mass production, what can be made in the lab now might take 5+ years to translate into a mass production line due to the scale of what needs to be done. <br><br>LiFeC batteries for example require millions of short carbon nano tubes capped with an iron atom to act as the cathode, in the lab it took weeks to make a single cell, in mass production, no one has been able to get it to work.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nanan00]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 9:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only problem is we're running out of easily accessible Zinc and it's mostly required for galvanising steel so I can see these getting very expensive in the future.  Some estimates have put us running out of Zinc in as little as 30-35 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[The simple solution to that is in approximately 32 years we'll start recycling it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 2:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thrilled school girl excitement for Apple products, but jaded disinterest in potentially real technological advancement?  A significant shift in this field could have HUGE repercussions to the world economy and environment (well beyond how long our friggin smartphones last).  I haven't heard of Zinc-air technology before, but I'm curious to learn more about it.  In particular, how well it works in cold weather.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[frankXchange]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 11:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Zinc-Air batteries themselves are not new. They're commonly used in things like hearing aids. Besides the advantages of Zinc itself (cheap, relatively safe), these batteries have a low discharge curve. Their biggest drawback is a high self-discharge rate (once exposed to air).<br><br>This is the first I've heard of an electrically rechargeable Zinc-Air. Up until now the only solution was to replace the Zinc, like a fuel cell (which is kinda what a Zinc-Air battery is).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Re-Volt was the best game...I had hours of fun with it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tikirob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh the fun of creating your own cars and racing online with friends. Loved that game.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 2nd 2009 4:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm specifically wondering what ever became of Stanford University's silicon nanowire batteries:<br>  <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/19/stanfords-nanowire-battery-leapfrogs-li-ion/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/19/stanfords-nanowire-battery-leapfrogs-li-ion/</a><br><br>Then, the Saudis steped in and gave the project a $10M grant: <br>   <a href="http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/2008/pr-cui-040208.html" rel="nofollow">http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/2008/pr-cui-040208.html</a><br><br>and I haven't heard a thing since...<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mbm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2009 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Rechargeable zinc-air batteries promise a lot, we'll see if they deliver in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/30/rechargeable-zinc-air-batteries-promise-a-lot-well-see-if-they/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't see exactly what you're implying but it sounds like you're blaming the lack of news on the saudi grant?<br><br>It's been little over a year since this article was published: <a href="http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/2008/pr-cui-040208.html" rel="nofollow">http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/2008/pr-cui-040208.html</a><br><br>And, incase you haven't read it: "The grant will be spread over a period of five years."<br>"[He] is expected to spend between three weeks and three months per year on the KAUST campus in Thuwal, on the coast of the Red Sea, participating in the research and academic life of the institution. But the bulk of the research funded by Cui's KAUST grant will be conducted on the Stanford campus."<br><br>Now, not only does he not have the 10mil yet, even if he did he'd have to plan how to use it. He likely has other projects and this particular technology is probably still being developed by others, if not by the man himself.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 1st 2009 1:37AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
