<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[These features fail to make it to top end notebooks, my logic tells me they wont be hitting XOs first.<br><br>Having said that I would love to be proven wrong.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[The XO has a few features that other notebooks/netbooks lack, such as its dual-mode screen and mesh Wi-Fi. The screen in particular, is something I wish I could get on a normal netbook.<br><br>And speaking of netbooks, you arguably have OLPC to thank for that entire trend. Intel and Asus conspiring to sink the OLPC project lead to the wide availability of small, cheap laptops.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[futurepastnow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 7:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[@FuturePastNow  "And speaking of netbooks, you arguably have OLPC to thank for that entire trend. Intel and Asus conspiring to sink the OLPC project lead to the wide availability of small, cheap laptops."<br><br>Precisely, and it clearly illustrates what the XO folks mean when they say they don't have to be 100% successful to have a huge influence.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, that's affordable! The kids will love this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[screw the kids. i want one!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I think the whole OLPC idea is failed to begin with, but an ebook approach, with some computer-like functionality, would make more sense.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Verythrax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA["911...yeah he's back.......through the window this time.."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[Give up nub, if you have to advertise in the comments sections of an Electronics blog for non-electronics then...<br><br>You have officially failed in life %110]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Name:]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 12:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[Make it run on zero point energy and I'm sold!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[patsy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[If $75 can get you that much in the future I am dying to see what $1,000 will buy!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, the OLPC appraoach has mostly failed but mainly due to the "business model" not because of the hardware (although, I have to admit, my XO-1 is not the fastest netbook I have ever seen)<br><br>OLPC's main failure was to not make the XO-1 widely available. A smaller failure factor was the Sugar OS. They should have gone with a simple Linux desktop equipped with educational software.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andras Soltesz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's just not as good a machine as the eee701 I bought at about the same time: the processor is slower, it won't connect to WPA-protected wifi, the battery already is useless, the keys are AWFUL, the trackpad cuts out intermittently, the screen is not that good, the included software's dull... mmm, what've I missed?<br><br>I loved the concept, it's why I went for the buy2give1; also, was hoping it'd be a more updated version of my beloved eMate. It's not. Very sad, all around.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gyffes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because they have such a great track record with pricing and release dates.  People stopped caring about this company when they jumped into bed with Microsoft and ruined any good will people had for them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matthewlenz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[" People stopped caring about this company when they jumped into bed with Microsoft and ruined any good will people had for them."<br>..<br>This isn't a company trying to sell whiny nerds computers, this is a company trying to equip children around the world who would otherwise be unable to afford a computer. This is a company whose products aren't used to turn into hackintoshes, or benchmarked with superpi. Their products are used to teach children around the world. In villages without electricity, the OLPC is the only light in the house, and Children are using it to learn-- and sometimes to teach-- their parents how to read. <br>If that isn't a company worth caring about, I don't know what is.<br><br>While I'm neutral to microsoft, you can say what you want about the company- but their operating system is so widely used and asked for, it makes sense to give the customers what they want, and its hard to argue with the fact that options are good when any simple Linux interface would have been better than Sugar, ANY.<br><br>Still very interested to see what this company will offer in the future. Ask every public school student in Uruguay, or a million kids across the world, OLPC is a special idea.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JimmyC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[I live in a third world country and im still think that the OLPC was a completely failure if not a scram.<br><br>-They doubled the initial price.<br>-They cut by half the promised features.<br>-They reducer the quality of the products (hardware and software).<br>-And, It was delayed over two years.<br><br>And when it was finally released then, third world countries jumped for a more affordable and less experimental approach :cheap pc.<br><br>Negroponte acted as a lousy car dealer, promising everything and giving nothing but a pile of trash.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magallanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, they should have stayed the hell away from microsoft.  Open-source is really the only way to go in developing and third-world countries.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[calgaryalta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 1:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, as does the fedora sugar devs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 2:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[i guess the man can dream......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wupolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[About that blurry photo...<br><br>Is this supposed to convince us that it's the real deal, or is it just intended as a mock-up? That guy's finger is casting a pretty dark shadow on the "LCD". Right where his finger is making contact, it's completely black. Now, we know an LCD wouldn't register that well without a backlight, and we know it's not color ePaper because, well, it isn't, soooooooo... fake?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tjhaflinger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[Could be his reflection on glass, but I'm not putting money on it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Metkis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 2:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is this thing going to run Windows XP with an ARM processor?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BeniRose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 1:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think it ever ran XP. Officially.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo^2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think it ever ran.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[You might make fun of the product but I'll say this about Negroponte, he will be remembered as making a positive difference.  We need more people, in the IT industry especially, like him.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[choupique]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[1.75 in..ches?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[simbr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 3rd 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, so the new one is only barely better and I should wait until 2012 for the awesome? thanks for the tip Nick.<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rzah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish my last name was "Negroponte"...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve-O]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 5th 2009 3:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on OLPC shakeup: dual-screen XO-2 out, ARM-based XO 1.75 in]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/03/olpc-shakeup-dual-screen-xo-2-out-arm-based-xo-1-75-in/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I want one now not in 2012 cos I think world might end in 2012.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pankomputerek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 24th 2009 5:06PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
