<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can the flip the switch so may gateway is now mac too?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shawn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[What?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d0mth0ma5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[that's what she said.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gonintendo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[can we buy some weed from you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[va jj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA["Well, it looks like reports that Apple might be killing Atom support in the next Snow Leopard update may have been slightly overblown"<br><br>Wait, are you suggesting that a rumor on the internet got blown out of proportion??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon J]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well if it did in fact happen I bet it will go down in history as the first time ever ;)<br><br><br>lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[They DID remove it.... then they brought it back.  I wouldn't say the first reports were blown out of proportion at all.  The reports brought back Atom support!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[smak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[@smak Ha, right, Apple read all of our comments on how we like to do something Apple is trying oh-so desperately to fight off, and then figured 'oh, let's bring support for this unsupported platform back'. I don't know who thought it could be a bug or glitch, but that's just ridiculous. This makes a LOT more sense.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 8:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought that it was interesting that they brought it back... Maybe an unofficial policy that isn't against hackintoshs?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chrise524]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 9:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sure, but rumours on the other in'nernets are far more benign :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Picklesworth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 10:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[So will this build be available to consumers soon?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deleted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[If by soon you mean never, Yes!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RLBurkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[haha oops. that made no sense.  I was thinking you meant buying a non apple with OSX.  This build will likely be available in 2-4 weeks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RLBurkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, okay.<br>Yeah, the retail Mac/Dell companionship is pretty unrealistic...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deleted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[50/50 . . . I wouldn't be betting on those odds, but I can't wait for the fanboys to start yelling at each other! <br><br>Sit back and watch the fireworks  . . . :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hsmom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rumors of Atom's demise have been greatly exaggerated.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pure. Win.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[*sigh* was going to post this, good thing I actually checked before I posted.<br><br>My internetz are now yours.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[The amusing thing about this whole situation is how one person riled up so many others with a single comment.  A comment made against an old build. 10C535 came out October 28th, well before the whole rumor mill spun up this non event into a crazy conspiracy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[we didnt start the flame war... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[this ain't a flame war, it's an arms race]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sacapuntas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not enough people visit CollegeHumor to get that reference and start "singing".<br>Good attempt though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevlar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[it was always burning since the world was turning]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Narin Ratana]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 11:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[...Peeps were hatin’ on it ‘fore I left my comment...<br><br>P.S. Narin Ratana, those are the lyrics to "we didn't start the FIRE".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 5th 2009 8:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is it that Mac OS supports netbooks so seamlessly?  Is it because they are x86?  Couldn't they just somehow lock out all the processors that they have never shipped?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jondo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[ever since 2005 thats when i first installed OSX on a PC "10.4.3" apple has the power to stop or even make it more difficult for people to hack their OS on to a Non-Apple computers. but for some reason they just don't do it but for the most part i think its kind of a Win/Win for Apple the more people that use your product the better.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[THEHAWKs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[They could, but they're too chicken.<br><br>I wonder why they allow their hardware to be "infected" with Windows...?<br><br>Maybe to save their own ass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo^2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mostly because hardware (Mac or PC) is nothing special. Apple supports the hardware they have shipped in their own products and the community has ported a lot of open source drivers to OSX. Netbooks are usually Linux friendly so they have really good support. Current netbook hardware is very similar to the first-gen MacBooks & Minis (Intel graphics/chipset) The CPU doesn't really matter much if it's x86 and supports SSE3. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sinister Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 8:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple has a choice when they work on their OS. They can plug holes to prevent hackers from making their software work on non-Apple devices, or they can work on something that's going to make their OS better. As the hacker problem is really a very small one, they are probably less likely to spend time and money on that and instead work on more important things.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sircastor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 5th 2009 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[i guess it was to soon to even say that apple would remove support but we will only know until the final build of 10.6.2 is out <br><br>i found out about this when installing on my HP Mini 311 had to swap out 10.6.2 kernel with 10.6.1  kernel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[THEHAWKs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 6:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[OS X actually supports ION? I looked it up a while back and I think some guy actually managed to install. Will it actually recognize ION as a 9400M? This sounds like all kinds of trouble.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zintinio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ion *IS* the 9400M, just attached to an Atom instead of a Core 2 Duo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bhtooefr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[i think any rumor about any apple product should be neglected as 99% of them end up false or get changed at the last minute. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rakesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Atom support didn't go away hence it (10.6.2) didn't "bring back" support for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good you clarified, i was starting to get worried...NOT!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pradster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why can't OS X just support everything like windows/linux etc...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Soulsaber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Please put down your keyboard and walk away. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Soulsaber<br><br>Why doesn't Burger King support McDonalds or Pepsi support Coca-Cola?<br>Comment makes no sense? Neither did yours.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[b3tan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[You best be trollin']]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deleted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why doesn't Burger King support Coca-Cola... Oh, wait. Never mind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigD145]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 8:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[He's got a valid point.  Remember how certain Macs needed to replace aftermarket video cards with factory ones before upgrading to Leopard?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Level 5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 5th 2009 7:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[@b3tan<br><br>Perhaps what Soulsaber is actually trying to say is "Why can't OS X just support everything like windows/linux etc DO." That is, Why can't OS X support everything like how Windows attempts to support everything. Or why can't OS X run on any computer like how Linux runs on nearly everything.<br><br>As opposed to "Why can't OS X support everything, for example things like Windows."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 5th 2009 7:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[When is this update going to be available? SL still has a few bugs that need to be squashed, especially in the graphics department. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[npa191]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Be quiet, you.<br><br>Maybe Jobs hasn't read your post yet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[10minutehobo^2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[we was wrong.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[va jj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, Apple would have a hard time selling copies of Snow Leopard if they cut atom support.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fishy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are you implying that an even noticeable percentage of SL sales come from the hackintosh community, particularly those running Atom CPU's? Laughable. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick_t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 9:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[From what I understand they can't remove support for it without patching (and encrypting) an otherwise pretty much open source kernel. The kernel recognises what instructions the processor can handle, and it it doesn't have an ID it just marks it has UNKNOWN. <br><br>"Don't panic Captain Mainwaring!" (For Brits only) <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kris.mcconnachie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 7:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[Support was NEVER pulled for the Atom. Check out insanelywind.com/forum<br><br>We got a guy over there thats been running the 10.6.2 update that was supposedly broken on an MSI Wind. According to him the update went flawlessly, and it runs smoother.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loudest_silence1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/04/latest-mac-os-x-10-6-2-beta-build-brings-back-atom-support/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hadn't heard much about the MAC of late, i appreciate your review as my sister is looking into getting a new MAC and this will be perfect for her.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lisa_qld]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 4th 2009 9:55PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
