http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/ Engadget Comments for Samsung pays Qualcomm $1.3 billion to secure wireless licenses http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 6:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 6:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 7:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 7:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 6:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 6:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/
Hell it could be 10 billion but it's still 9 figures.]]>Nov 9th 2009 6:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 6:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 6:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 6:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 6:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 9:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 10:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 6:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/What does this mean for other companies for the next 15 years. Does this mean technological improvement will improve more slowly now it seems that monopoly is back?
]]>Nov 9th 2009 11:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 7:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 8:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/
End Sarcasm]]>Nov 9th 2009 10:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 11:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/
And in 3 years, this 82xx is still half the graphical speed of an "slower" iPhone 3GS.]]>Nov 9th 2009 12:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 8:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 2:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/09/samsung-pays-qualcomm-1-3-billion-to-secure-wireless-licenses/Nov 9th 2009 8:35PM