<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[The thing is, Microsoft never manufactures the computer itself. Only Mac does. <br><br>You can't fault Microsoft for Lenovo making black, boxy work notebooks while Apple ships out sexy, glossy MacBooks for...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Huh???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[plyx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Verizon and Nokia infringed on Apple?<br><br>Lolwut??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 10:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will Sue help them? far as I was aware Sue pretty much keeps to herself these days ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cy Starkman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2009 6:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple = 2<br>Psystar = 1<br><br>K.O.!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZbHRP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Keep pruning that walled garden, Apple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[konshuss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[i will lay down odds that next week Apple will go to Florida and file a motion to have it declared that Leopard and Snow Leopard are the same thing in regards to these matters. And then when that is granted, file for a summary judgment citing the California ruling as guidance. And as such, the Florida judge will very very likely rule the same as California. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would like to know who Psystar's backers are.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adrian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[That toasty smell coming from Florida?  It ain't bagels.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2009 1:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Adrian<br><br>Here's a little info on them.<br><br><a href="http://www.laweekly.com/2009-11-12/news/pedraza-vs-macintosh-worms-in-the-apple/" rel="nofollow">http://www.laweekly.com/2009-11-12/news/pedraza-vs-macintosh-worms-in-the-apple/</a><br><br>Doing a little bit of engadget's work here ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smartmouth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2009 1:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Adrian-Maybe they are the same employers for Arlington Stewart which is why they can not be disclosed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2009 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[For goodness sake Apple, just let us run OSX on whatever computer system we want and save us all the hassle.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I certainly agree! That said, I definitely disagree with the means that Psystar took to do so, i.e taking code from the hackintosh community and then 'dissing' them (as covered in the last podcast). ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Euan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[although perhaps dissing the hackintosh community will save it from any reprocussions of this lawsuit. (meaning apple would have to sue them seperately)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[check]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[For the nth time, Apple is a hardware company. Apple does not have the capacity, nor intention, to provide support for OSX on 3rd party platforms. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TylerDurden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Serious question, Rod: why should they?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncontrol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Euan - yep!  'Those who live in glass houses, should not throw stones'<br><br>(but I still have a soft spot for Psystar for taking the fight right into the Lion's den - just a shame they turned up at a gun fight...with a knife!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is not in Apple's best interest to sell OS X as a standalone product.  They use their software sell hardware.  Selling OS X for PCs would cause them to lose some hardware sales.  Even if selling OS X as a standalone only lost them one hardware sale for every 20 new OS sales, it would probably still reduce their profits.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TylerDurden and Uncontrol:<br><br>I know Apple is ALSO a hardware company, I couldn't care less as a consumer.  If I can run Windows on a emulator on OSX then I don't see why the OSX can't be run on a Windows system.  Why?  Because Apple would make a lot of money!<br><br>The whole support issue is a moot point - just licence it as is, the hakintosh community have been doing very well without official Apple support.  I for one would be prepared to pay for a legit copy of OSX with limited support from Apple and find my own solutions through other channels when required.  I just want to use OSX for a few things in my life without either having to pay a king's ransom for the hardware (and software) or having to completely hack my PC to bits (illegally according to Apple's small print).<br><br>That's not unreasonable is it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[if only apple would listen to engadget poster "rod", they could finally become profitable ...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncontrol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[They do already. They never attacked the OSX86 project. Why are people so ignorant of the difference? Psystar ripped off netkas too. They deserve to get ass raped.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FoO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey 'Uncontrol' - here's your dummy back.  This isn't personal.<br><br>I'm sure a lot of people would love to be able to run OSX in a window on W7.  The only reason I would appreciate this is to run Final Cut Pro, but i'm so heavily up to the eye balls in PC h/w that it's not gonna happen any time soon.  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[just because you want to run OS X doesn't mean apple has any incentive whatsoever to release OS X as a standalone product. everyone who keeps parroting that apple needs, NEEDS to release OS X for all machines if they want to continue to grow is insanely short-sighted and foolish]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncontrol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Buy yourself a Mac if you want to run OSX and save YOURSELF a lot of hassle. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SinisterJoe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[A Non-linear video editor in a virtualized environment?  Are you even half serious?  That'd be slower than slow as molasses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fonso]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I never made that assertion.  I never mentioned anything about Apple 'needing'  to do anything.  (Although as it happens, I do think there will come a time when Apple starts to entertain the idea of a standalone OS, just like one day Porsche might start putting their engines in the proper place...the front of the car!)   No, I just want to pay Apple to use their software, like all the other potential 1 billion customers :) <br><br>It may take a sea change, we may be walking on Mars before it happens...but it'll happen!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whichever company it is....they are here for only 1 reason...to make money...in however way they wish(if there was no law..am sure they would have used any illegal way to make money).<br><br>All that talk like "consumer's need"/"environment friendly" many corporates say is bullshit....they wouldn't do anything if they do not have some kinda gain from it.<br>Behind every step a business organization takes, there is a selfish reason(can be profits, brand reputation, what not)...what else do you expect ? None of them are here for charity.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Srikar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[of course it is unreasonable !<br><br>it's not YOU to order how others people decide for their own property.<br><br>Apple doesn't care about marketshare in operating system, there are NO MONEY THERE. <br><br>Microsoft is only succeeding because it's a software company with an incredible luck when IBM created the pc.<br><br>Apple is an HARDWARE enterprise. they sell hardware, they live hardware, they breath hardware, they roll in hardware. they smoke hardware. HARDWARE.<br><br>Their whole business is HARDWARE<br><br>and the software is a mean to improve their HARDWARE.  Their hard work in the software is to improve their HARD WORKD in the HARDWARE.<br><br>you can read all the numbers about apple business it's all about : hardware<br><br>and a tiny portion about software, all tiny. very tiny.<br><br><br>they don't want marketshare, they want profit to continue to do as they always did : creating great computers.<br><br><br>-<br>there are NO market for os x on pc. NONE.<br><br>you are a geek, a hacker, a unbelievable technical person, it's GOOD for you, but you are NOT a market.<br><br>you are NOT the mass wanting another os.<br><br>the mass want a COmputer WORKING just fine.<br><br>They do not want to buy box with linux or os X.   They can admit a "update" kit, nothing more.<br><br>and they are RIGHT.  Operating system is complicate stuff inside my computer I shouldn't care : I just want a great computer.<br><br>OS is a PART of a great computer, an important part, maybe the most important part, Apple knows it, you know  it , I know it.<br><br>Because we ALL know it, you know apple HAS to maintain an absolute control on it.<br><br>-<br><br>Microsoft is not simply selling windows.  Microsoft is a part of the stuff used by cheap company to make cheap computers. <br><br>Apple is NOT a software provider for others companies<br><br>You don't WANT them to be that !<br><br>you love apple mac os x because it's NOT what windows is : a common operating system for the industry.<br><br><br>-<br>apple can make os x thanks to Mac,  apple can make Mac thanks to os x.<br><br>it's sad<br>but true<br><br>years after years you can read the business numbers; they are HARD, Horrible and painfully TRUE.<br><br>-<br>In reality, you don't want to force apple. you just want apple to be apple, and quietly, as you love,  hacking your computer with software you like.<br><br>do not ask more, because people can't give you more,  they would love but they can't.<br><br>Go to see Linux. it's HARD work made with all love and passion people can bring.<br><br>It's the same with Microsoft and Apple, they are what they need to be. it's not evil from hell.<br><br><br>-<br>Microsoft and Apple are NOT the same kind of company.  Not at all<br><br>one is software based<br>one is hardware based<br><br>All is simple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oomu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[No thank you! One of the reasons I love Apple computers is not having to worry about all that hardware configuration BS plus all the crap that comes with it. If I wanted to give myself those headaches then I'd have just built yet another PC.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ridley182]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh Come on Oomu, stop holding back, tell us how you really feel ;)  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Rod, So you would pay $999 for FCP but you can't afford a Mac?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iPriest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[*cough* if Apple is a hardware company, why can I go into an Apple store and just buy OSX? Oh right, because they are both a hardware AND software company, otherwise they would just sell their machines with Windows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[konshuss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Absolutely!  <br><br>If only that was the only cost and if only it could run natively on my PC.  That, unfortunately would be the tip of the iceberg as I would then need to drop at least another $4K to get an Apple system that would come close to performing as quickly as the PC system I just built - which cost's less than half the price to build than the Mac.  (Whilst I appreciate the benefits of Apple products, I very much prefer PC's to Macs.  I'm not a fan of locked down systems / software and I don't mind it when things break all the time!)<br><br>It's all very well saying buy a Mac...but not at their costs / performance ratio, it doesn't make sense to me.  I don't care about pretty hardware and I don't hang out in Starbucks.  I'm not bothered with OSX on the whole (it's a great OS) but i'm very happy to use any OS - OSX, W7, or Linux for my everyday computing, with a preference for W7...but for all things video I have to say I prefer FCP over Adobe products.  I just don't fancy laying another 5K on the table to do so.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TylerDurden<br><br>I guess Quicktime isn't software, then.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerrrg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do you guys think you're clever by pointing out Apple makes software as well, or something? The issue is that their software industry is meaningless without their bread-and-butter; the hardware. It's like saying Microsoft is a hardware company because the manufacture mice and keyboards and XBOXs along with creating Windows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncontrol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[You are obviously unable to grasp the concept for a successful business model. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick_t]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2009 12:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, I understand that Psystar was wrong in this case, but wouldn't they go around this lawsuit if they just perform the service? For example, let's say i buy the osx software, and  want to install it to a pc. Couldn't i just send the money to psytar and say "hey, i wan't you to install this on my pc"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smartmouth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2009 2:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[For all those dumbasses who keep parroting that Apple needs to release OS X as a universal install for any PC:<br><br>1) The computer world does not revolve around how Microsoft's business model: OS on any PC.<br>2) Apple has its own business model: highly integrated hardware and software (like the Wii or PS3)<br>3) Apple is extremely profitable as is and will soon make more money than Microsoft.<br><br>Apple's soaring piles of cash:<br><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/charts-of-the-week-apples-soaring-pile-of-cash-2009-11" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinsider.com/charts-of-the-week-apples-soaring-pile-of-cash-2009-11</a><br><br>Apple market cap closing in on Microsoft's<br><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-market-cap-apple-vs-microsoft-2009-11" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-market-cap-apple-vs-microsoft-2009-11</a><br><br>iPhone: Most profitable phone on Earth<br><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/external/gigaom/2009/11/10/10gigaom-apple-shoots-past-nokia-as-worlds-most-profitable-2393.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/external/gigaom/2009/11/10/10gigaom-apple-shoots-past-nokia-as-worlds-most-profitable-2393.html</a><br><br>And you Apple-haters can keep hating but nothing's going to change Apple's soaring and accelerating success.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[[Highest Ranked]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2009 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tylerdurden <br><br>Apple is a hardware bundling company. If they truly were a hardware company they wouldn't use ATI, Intel, Asus, or any other parts made by true hardware company. Apple bundles everything together and sells it in a nice package, but they're no hardware company.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[johnnyg0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2009 8:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was really hoping that maybe, just maybe, Psystar had a chance]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pt0ne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Psystar cannot be allowed to rip off Apple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[[Highest Ranked]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2009 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[unfair competition?  seems like ANY competition would be considered unfair by them...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d889]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good. Apple has not gone after Hackintoshers and the only reason it would start would be if someone were to start making money off of it. The sooner Psystar goes away, the more likely the Hackintosh community will be left alone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jackson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[dingding<br><br>this is nothing but good news for hackintoshers]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncontrol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love you!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GroovDude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is that? I would think this gives Apple more reason to go after them. Psystar stole its code from the hackintosh community in the first place, and if Apple beat Psystar because they were "illegally copying, modifying, and distributing Apple's code", that means Apple has an easy win if it chooses to go after the hackintosh community]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EGOvoruhk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[So specifically blacklisting Atom processors is not going after hackintoshers?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[insky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@EGO<br>How could Apple take down the hackintosh community? You can find guides to install OS X with a simple google search. If you need OS X just head to a torrent site.  Apple will be as successful as the RIAA if they ever try to do that. Long live hackintosher's!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jackson "Good. Apple has not gone after Hackintoshers and the only reason it would start would be if someone were to start making money off of it." - Hello! It doesn't matter if someones making money off it or not because Apple is still potentially losing a hardware sale on every hackintosh built. Therefore they have good reason to go after the hackintosh community regardless if they are "making money" off it. BTW by building a hackintosh out of generic Intel hardware they are making money off, the cost difference between buying generic Intel hardware and premium priced Apple hardware is their profit margin. And Apple is going after hackintoshers by killing off the Atom, the reason they killed the Atom is because they see cheap netbook hackintoshes as a serious threat to their profits.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WmPenn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2009 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/14/apple-wins-copyright-infringement-case-against-psystar-in-califo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, finally somebody gets it. And isn't immediately low ranked for pointing it out. Apple doesn't care if individuals do this for their own use, they care when sleazebuckets like Psystar try to make money off of it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 15th 2009 12:42AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
