<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[2.5 makes it kinda fail, but still a nice nas box for 69 bucks. So this bittorent client, does it have like a web administration page or some specific software to administrate it? Might go pick one up it looks like quite a bargain...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Kurasz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[2.5 makes it fail worthy...but your probably going to pick one up...I hate having to use dot dot dot is fail worthy but I have to use it to get my point across. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boomshakalaka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[would have been nice if it has an eSATA so it would have an 'out' for HDD expansion on the fast.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gaiden]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice, I want this for Christmas.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not really useful without gigabit.  I have a 10/100 NAS enclosure, but I use it via USB because the upload rate was too slow.  Worked fine for SMB shares to XBMC though...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keep6]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[You guys are missing the point, *pause*, It's $70, for NAS! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boomshakalaka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[I paid $50CAD for my 3.5" ComGears FT-35ILAN NAS 2 years ago (how could anyone resist?).  It's nice to have around, but not worth it without gigabit, for my needs at least.<br><br><a href="http://www.comgears.com/en/nas.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.comgears.com/en/nas.html</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keep6]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, I missed the part about the BT client for this Addonics NAS.  That might actually make it worth something more.  I wonder what client it's running.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keep6]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[After buying many of these (for 3.5" drives), I think the number one factor in my next purchase is going to be performance.  Until then, I'll be using the current server setup.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pmow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 9:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[No gigabit, and for $69? What, are they crazy?<br><br>Slow USB hard drive: 30MBps<br>This NAS: 10MBps (80Mbps, after some TCP/IP overhead)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Ochs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 9:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[You realize your paying a bit for the "worlds smallest" bullshit right? Not for 2.5 1TB SSD included, Teamed 4x1GB connections, wireless N, bluetooth, USB 3.0, eSATA, Win 7 w/ OS X SL patch...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boomshakalaka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, but the cost of Gigabit v 100Mbit ethernet chips is practically negligible nowadays. Why do manufacturers still insist on making 10/100 Mbit routers, games consoles, even netbooks? Gigabit ethernet is particularly important in a NAS, no matter how small or cheap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[r3loaded]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[The lack of gigabit ethernet is certainly annoying, just like the lack of it on some wireless N access points.  Why bother having a nice fast device if you are going to gimp it with 10/100Mbps ethernet.  10MBps doesn't cut it for data traffic for most anything anymore.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[the reason is that the cpu in this thing is not fast enough to take advantage of gigabit. They don't mention the speed on the page, but I would assume it is a low power arm. If you want a good gigabit nas you're getting into atom territory, and dropping a few bills for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[awholeian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[NO gigabit??? Makes this good idea instantly obsolete...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jroy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought the Addonics USB to rj45 NAS dongle last year because it seemed like a neat and compact solution.  It was, for about 10 minutes at a time.  My guess is that it was overheating, because it came back to life after a few hours of unplugged R&R.  Then it would die again.  Poor return policy with Addonics as well.  You get what you pay for...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phatch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't SMB and Samba the same thing? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sneakz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kind of.  It supports SMB via Samba.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes. And it supports both!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 10:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this is smaller:<br><br><a href="http://www.canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&cmd=pd&pid=026714&cid=NTW.791" rel="nofollow">http://www.canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&cmd=pd&pid=026714&cid=NTW.791</a><br><br>Admittedly it doesn't include the drive in the box itself. But it's still smaller.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nor can a drive be contained inside that device.<br><br>It's akin to the old Linksys NSL-U2, aka slug.<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSLU2" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSLU2</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[blueeyesm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[NFS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 11:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like FAT32 only - no xfs or zfs or anything remotely 1990s. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Moonshine Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[hum.... I don't get it... No Raid, no Gigabite Ethernet, no Wi-Fi, just one 2,5' bay... Isn't that just an expensive print server? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fmarcos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dude, that's the whole point! No raid, no Gigabite Ethernet, no wifi, just one HD bay! Cheaper NAS. And I have a feeling that a print server doesn't serve files........ just printers.....<br><br>Although, gigabite ethernet would have been nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Please stop saying "gigabite". It hurts my soul.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ripped scene content in the photos!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Civuck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 12:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK, for all the folks out there who are bagging on this one, help me find something similar that fills my needs:<br><br>I want a low-power single-drive NAS device with Gigabit ethernet that's relatively portable.  <br><br>I already have a RAID NAS on the network that serves multiple machines.  However RAID, as we are often reminded, is a hedge against the inevitable disk crash, NOT a backup solution.  Therefore, I want a portable single-drive device that I can use to make weekly backups from the real NAS, then take offsite for storage elsewhere (my office @ work).<br><br>I really want a dedicated low-power device, not a removable drive tray in a linux box that I have to hang on the network with a 400W power supply humming away.  Preferably, said device will also not be super expensive.  If this Addonics thing had GigE, I'd be all over it.<br><br>Any ideas?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Herbie555]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Look at the Intel NAS for $199 on newegg ( it was $149 this weekend.)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[curiousmike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hrm...  According to the Datasheet:  4.8" x 16" x 13.23", and 14.57 lbs empty or 20lbs w/ 4 drives.<br><br>Not exactly portable...<br><br>For the same price, maybe I'll just get one of the Acer Revos and throw a bigger drive into it.  Sure, I'll have to do more to configure the software, but at 7" square and ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Herbie555]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 1:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Excito Bubba Two meets your criteria, and then some. Of course it's pretty expensive, too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mcg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[make it take a 3.5 drive and add NZBget to the web interface and im sold.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 1:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[This one by IO-Data is just as small (if not smaller), and includes gigabit ethernet:<br><a href="http://www.iodata.jp/product/hdd/lanhdd/hdlp-g/gallery.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.iodata.jp/product/hdd/lanhdd/hdlp-g/gallery.htm</a><br><a href="http://www.iodata.jp/product/hdd/lanhdd/hdlp-g/spec.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.iodata.jp/product/hdd/lanhdd/hdlp-g/spec.htm</a><br><br>Only available here in Japan though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2009 4:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Addonics Mini NAS: when RAID is too much to ask for]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/17/addonics-mini-nas-when-raid-is-too-much-to-ask-for/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not to beat a dead horse, but cheap gigabit chipsets are absolute crap. The same holds true for the routers/switches that serve them... or the PCI bus on the receiving end. There's a _lot_ spots where a bottleneck could occur.<br><br>In real world situations, I have seen a 2-3x speed increase when serving files from a USB 2.0 SATA drive over gigabit into memory (so I could exclude the write speeds on the receiving device)... not a huge difference, but helpful nonetheless.<br><br>Regardless, my point is there's a lot more to it than just having a cheap gigabit chip in there instead. And to be perfectly honest, 10/100 serves 1080p content fine to any extender in my house.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Epon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 26th 2009 9:33AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
