http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/ Engadget Comments for Nikon D300S review roundup: it's awesome, but D300 is better value http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 7:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 8:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/
However, it looks like it's still enviro sealed, which is a nice bonus. That's always been Nikons one up on Canon, IMO.]]>Nov 18th 2009 8:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/
This is more like when games are released in an ultimate super edition with one extra bonus level or something.

It's for the people who didn't have it previously.]]>Nov 18th 2009 8:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 8:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 8:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 8:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 10:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 12:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/
Also, the ergonomics on Nikon SLRs are MUCH better than with Canons--how about mentioning that?]]>Nov 18th 2009 8:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 9:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/
It's a 140% increase in recording time.
Why shouldn't they make snide remarks?]]>Nov 18th 2009 9:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 9:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 9:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/
And I'm pretty sure all the cameras have well-surpassed that 2GB FAT limitation a while ago...seeing as how SDs and CFs are all in the 16GB+ range.]]>Nov 18th 2009 10:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 4:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/It looks like D300.
For example,ISO6400,12MP,8fps with battery grip,etc...

I'm waiting for D400 and save money to buy it.]]>Nov 18th 2009 9:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 11:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/
The D300 body was $1799 when it came out in 2007
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/NikonD300/page2.asp

The D300s body is $1699 today
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond300s/page2.asp

I see what you are saying... you'd be better off buying a D300 today to save some money... but let's keep the facts straight.]]>Nov 18th 2009 4:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/
Oh, dang, my Canon camera just shut off... Hey, can you start over?]]>Nov 18th 2009 1:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 18th 2009 2:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM

Compare Pentax K-x @ ISO 6400 vs Nikon D300s @ ISO 6400

Hilarious! ]]>Nov 18th 2009 3:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/18/nikon-d300s-review-roundup-its-awesome-but-d300-is-better/Nov 19th 2009 8:14AM