http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/ Engadget Comments for Intel's Cedarview Atom chip rumored to go 32nm in 2011 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 12:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 12:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/
Why not just the ION now or wait for the ION2?]]>Nov 22nd 2009 12:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/

*Kicks VIA in the balls*]]>Nov 22nd 2009 1:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 1:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 1:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 1:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 1:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/
Having the replies hidden is such a pain in the arse.]]>Nov 22nd 2009 2:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 3:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 2:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 4:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 4:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 2:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 2:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 2:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 2:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/In the old one it was more or less a game of chance.]]>Nov 22nd 2009 2:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/ME ME ME ME MY COMMENT ME ME ME ME MY OPINION ME ME MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE]]>Nov 22nd 2009 3:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 3:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/

It's always good news when they go down in "nm"...]]>Nov 22nd 2009 4:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/
An those stars aren't me cursing, just blanks because there are a few different Core 2's.]]>Nov 22nd 2009 7:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 3:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/

Anyways, i really hope windows 8 supports arm, cause we really need competition...]]>Nov 22nd 2009 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 4:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 4:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 5:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 5:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 6:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 8:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 5:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/
I'm still using Merom.

And please change the commenting system, at least back to what it used to be!]]>Nov 22nd 2009 5:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 6:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 22nd 2009 7:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/Nov 23rd 2009 5:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/intels-cedarview-atom-chip-rumored-to-go-32nm-in-2011/
Its hard to argue that Intel is dominating the netbook CPU market, there isn't a whole lot of incentive for them to push the envelope in that market.]]>Nov 23rd 2009 9:55AM