<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh yeah, it's expensive!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagamer43]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah SSD's aren't plausible till they get way cheaper and bigger.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[ It's not even that. I don't know why a company would need a 1TB MLC SSD. It's not enterprise grade because it's not an SLC, meaning it's got a 10-fold decrease in read/write cycles.<br><br>I think OCZ just wants to get a product out there so economies of scale can slowly start to bring the price down. Too bad it's gonna take forever to come down to a sane man's levels (3-4 years I'd say).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagamer43]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Bigger than 1 TB? How much pr0n do you have?<br><br>Also, cheaper isn't true. This upgrade is the best thing you can do for a system, unless you like to deal with awful RAID setups. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prophet of the Light]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's not entirely true, an MLC drive with good wear leveling algorithms can replace SATA drives in some nearline situations.  Capacity and price tend to be the bigger question for those situations.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[msalivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's really no need to put media on SSDs - you'll see the biggest improvements from moving the OS and programs onto the SSD. Unless you're copying and moving your porn all the time, I guess. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jeff Kibuule <br><br>When the Compact Disc came out it was $10,000 for the first players, which were single beam, no oversampling, and highly sensitive to scratches, dirt, and vibration.<br><br>It's about time solid state media is at a point it can become competitive with the antiquated mechanical drives we use now.<br><br>It is very likely other technologies will even take over SSD, but SSD is a magnificent improvement over noisy mechanical monstrosities hard drives are today.  It is more likely a stepping stone to memristor or other solid state technologies.<br><br>Frankly, memory speed in general needs to improve to keep pace with the CPU speeds.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperSparky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 7:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jeff Kibuule <br><br>For the price OCz is asking for its colosis drive, you would be better served getting a much faster PCI-e based Fusion IO SSD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (BarCODE)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 11:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, they should really try and find ways to lower the price of SSD's because the technology is game changing...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stef]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[They seriously left out TRIM support?  So writes on the drive are only going to be that fast until all of the cells have been written to once?  That seems like sort of a dealbreaker omission at this point in the SSD game, especially with non-upgradeable firmware!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[It seems to me that their garbage collection setup helps out quite a bit with this without using TRIM, so it's not quite as bad as it looks, but at the same time, yeah TRIM would be preferred.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know.  If it's $3.24/gb and comes in at 1TB (yes there are smaller capacities) that's $3,240.  That a mid to low end BOUTIQUE PC.  At that price you should be supporting firmware upgrades at the least.  And definitely TRIM.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MonkeyHood]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 1:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Did you guys read the article? The controllers are in a RAID setup. RAID can't handle TRIM. So they're doing it themselves.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pc_Madness]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 1:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[ I did read the article.  It's not a failing on the part of RAID, it's a failing on the part of the RAID controller.  And considering how expensive these will be, they should have better RAID controllers.<br><br>The article says :<br>The 4 Indilinx controllers *are* capable individually, but the the Silicon Image processor does not support TRIM forwarding so the controllers never get to see the TRIM commands.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MonkeyHood]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 6:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Yes I get that it's a fault of the RAID controller, but as others have pointed out, for this price they should have better RAID controllers and/or upgradeable firmware.  Saying it's the RAID controller's fault rather than the SSD boards' themselves doesn't exonerate the product; the bottom line is that TRIM doesn't work on this product and there won't be a way for a user to add it later with a firmware update.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 9:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[SSD prices will eventually plummet, so many competitors, so much potential... Without TRIM on this one, no sense in buying unless you just want to READ from it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Krazie00]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well....TRIM only affects write speeds. So unless if you plan to do a lot of copying onto the SSD, it won't cause too many problems for you. Your boot speeds, application load speeds etc. will still be awesome!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[charsoxer0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[They have been plummetting. 75% per year. If that continued, in 2 years, they'd be like 50% per gigabyte.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prophet of the Light]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 12:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Moore's law just aint fast enough. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[These things have to get pretty hot... I hope there is a way these get cooled.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steveranieri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 8:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm sure you could just use bricks of money to cool it down.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jol<br>Not sure how that would cool it down?  The logistics fail me!<br><br>/joke]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 12:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hear gold is a great heat conductor... Just drop a bar on top and you're good to go!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 6:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lack of moving parts means less heat is generated.. This is also why their power consumption is lower.. less power is lost through heat..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 8:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[When will these babies get cheaper? I want one now! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JonGarcia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't wait till the future.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmitt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not intel, not indalinx (or else it would have trim). In other words, it might be fast, but I'm not buying it until anandtech gets a hands on review. Their the only ones I would ever trust with an ssd review, nobody else knows what their talking about...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ethcool06]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[IIRC, it uses two Indilinx SSD controllers behind a JMicron RAID controller.  I'd guess that's why it doesn't support Trim, because the OS is only seeing it as a single drive, and the JMicron controller really isn't suited for this usage.  But then, I don't think there's a better choice right now, so we just have to live without Trim.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[msalivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Four Indilinux controllers (which support TRIM), behind a Silicon Image processor which doesn't support TRIM forwarding... but why read the article anyway? ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 10:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Oops, that's Indilinx.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 10:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because I'm way too lazy to read something I can't afford while trying to work out a more pressing VPN issue.  Thanks for correcting me :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[msalivar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 10:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is TRIM ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Edifier78]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[The TRIM command allows an operating system to tell a solid-state drive (or "SSD") which data blocks are no longer in use, such as those left by deleted files. An OS operation such as delete generally only means the data blocks involved are flagged as not in use. TRIM allows the OS to pass this information on down to the SSD controller, which otherwise would not know it could trash those blocks.<br><br>The purpose of the instruction is to maintain the speed of the SSD throughout its lifespan, avoiding the slowdown that early models encountered once all of the cells had been written to once.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Edifier78]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear Engadget, nice job with the site redisign! Can you please fix the iPhone site? It's ridiculous now!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bill cant fart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[iPhone rox your sox thats why its too cool for engadget]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[manifest3r]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[The mobile site on my WinMo phone is broken as well.  Loading up Opera 10 beta or PIE, it takes me to the mobile homepage, or the normal homepage if i click the link, but when i try to go to an article, it redirects me back to the mobile homepage.  Very irritating.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Delta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 3:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Engadget editors are under the impression, that everyone uses not only Macs, but Mac laptops specifically.<br><br>The reality is that in 2009 there were twice as many desktops sold as there were laptops (<a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/pc-sales/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/pc-sales/</a>), and I Mac users are probably less than 20% of Engadget users.<br><br>The problem with Engadget's Mac bias isn't that they give better or more coverage to Apple (they arguably do, but whatevs.) The problem is that they are out of touch with reality of the market they are writing about.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, correction, there are as many desktops as laptops sold. Still, it's not like everyone has a laptop.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[ And this applies because....?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnesium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 11:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[ This applies because I had a bad day I needed to vent :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 3:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK, venting is alright...but you should have at least found a Apple/Mac related post to vent under. After all, you wouldn't have to look very hard to find one, right? :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnesium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 12:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[enough with making them faster, they need to start making them CHEAPER. any of us with HDD's would be happy with some of the slowest SSD's so long as it didnt cost too terribly much. i'll buy one the day i can get 256GB under for $300. even if it isnt quite as fast as these performance ones. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SmilinGoat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 9:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[They're probably not having that much luck with cheaper, which is why they're doing something as drastic as this. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SmilinGoat Since the majority of the cost in an SSD are the NAND flash memory chips it's only sensible to add some speed for a few dollars extra. Speed is typically gained by reading/writing multiple banks of chips simultaneously, therefore the speed/cost of the chips is not the primary driver in overall speed of an SSD. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord Krutor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 25th 2009 10:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why would you buy this without TRIM? Once you've written data to the drives a few times, it's going to slow down to normal MLC drive speeds!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 10:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Read the article, they dedicate a whole page to this.  OCZ has its own "secret weapon" garbage collection setup which fixes the issues with that while the drive is idle.  Yes, I agree that TRIM support in addition to this would be nice, but it seems this is a pretty good alternative.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 10:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would be happy with 50MB/s sustained read/write, so make it cheaper already! My HDD only gets 30 max.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MicrosoftPwnsU]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 10:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Buy a Western Digital 640gb HDD, black edition. <br><br>That'll do it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prophet of the Light]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 12:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Random read/write is more important for me. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2009 12:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/22/oczs-colossus-desktop-ssd-gets-reviewed-oh-yeah-its-fast/</guid><description><![CDATA[Their review system is using Windows XP? Wow, great tech site. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 22nd 2009 10:22PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
