http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/ Engadget Comments for Klausner takes aim at RIM, Motorola over visual voicemail patents http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/Nov 23rd 2009 8:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/
That would certainly be bittersweet.]]>Nov 23rd 2009 8:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/
IMO, you should only be able to hold a patent if you can demonstrate you're able to produce your "invention". ]]>Nov 23rd 2009 8:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.klausnertechnologies.com/

Seriously, their whole company website is really sparse and only concerns licensing their visual voicemail patent... I wonder how many actual technical employees this stupid company has... probably all lawyers.]]>Nov 23rd 2009 8:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/Nov 23rd 2009 8:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/Nov 23rd 2009 10:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/
I think I coded a better site than that in 5th grade.]]>Nov 24th 2009 12:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/Nov 23rd 2009 11:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/
Yeah, I haven't got a clue what they're looking for.
]]>Nov 24th 2009 2:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/
Since I have prior art, can I market versions without infringing on this patent? I am interested in possibly making a Android application.

I was going to pass on some info to a patent lawyer someone was going to point me to, but misplaced the contact info.]]>Nov 24th 2009 7:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/
If you are telling the truth, then you should not post here, but spend all yoru energy recovering your lost data, and do it! ]]>Nov 24th 2009 8:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/klausner-takes-aim-at-rim-motorola-over-visual-voicemail-patent/Nov 24th 2009 8:34AM