Entelligence: Black Friday
Entelligence is a column by technology strategist and author Michael Gartenberg, a man whose desire for a delicious cup of coffee and a quality New York bagel is dwarfed only by his passion for tech. In these articles, he'll explore where our industry is and where it's going -- on both micro and macro levels -- with the unique wit and insight only he can provide.
Black Friday is nearly here with a legion of new gadgets, devices and products all designed to seduce you with technology. Thousands of gadgets are released each year promising to enhance our lives, increase productivity and deliver a sound ROI. Often, however, it seems that many products are released before they're ready for the mainstream and any positives are negated by poor design, buggy code, or just being too far off the curve. This is the pitfall of the early adopter, but remembering Gartenberg's First Law of Consumer Electronics can help avoid some of this pain when you're doing your holiday shopping.
Remember Gartenberg's Three Laws? We're only interested in the First Law today: "There is a worldwide market of 50,000 for anything." Unless you are part of this group of 50,000 -- namely folks that install operating systems on a Sunday afternoon as a form of social entertainment -- you need to look beyond technology for the sake of technology and see if what you're about to purchase meets the three criteria below. If it doesn't, you might want to wait for version 3.0.
On the flip side, here's three negative traits to watch out for as well.
Michael Gartenberg is vice president of strategy and analysis at Interpret, LLC. His weblog can be found at gartenblog.net. Contact him at gartenberg AT gmail DOT com. Views expressed here are his own.

Remember Gartenberg's Three Laws? We're only interested in the First Law today: "There is a worldwide market of 50,000 for anything." Unless you are part of this group of 50,000 -- namely folks that install operating systems on a Sunday afternoon as a form of social entertainment -- you need to look beyond technology for the sake of technology and see if what you're about to purchase meets the three criteria below. If it doesn't, you might want to wait for version 3.0.
- Visible differentiation: Is the product really different? When Apple introduced the Macintosh, the product could easily be discerned by anyone at a distance of 100 paces as being vastly different from anything else on the market. Early Macintosh buyers rarely felt buyer's remorse.
- Measured increase in your productivity: Is there a measured increase in productivity associated with the technology that will actually benefit you specifically? Mobile computing devices such as notebooks, smartphones and the like all paid early adopters back well in terms of measurable gains that were easily quantifiable, but you want to make sure that those gains apply to you. For example, if you're not a frequent traveler or rarely need to leave your desk, you won't see the same gains on a netbook or new smartphone that a road warrior might.
- Justifiable cost of ownership: If it isn't noticeably different or won't increase productivity, a new gadget had better find some way to save you some money.
On the flip side, here's three negative traits to watch out for as well.
- Unproven platforms: New products all want to achieve status as a de-facto "platform." The fact is, few technologies will ever achieve this status and it's best beware of technology purporting to be a new platform or paradigm (especially if it can't meet the criteria above).
- Performance gains that are measured but not noticed: While vendors often claim vast speed differences, remember that while performance can be measured with a stopwatch, it might not actually be noticeable in real world use.
- Partial solutions: Finally, some products seem like good ideas but are really only partially done. Apple's Newton is a great example: it was arguably the finest PDA OS ever created but lacked seamless PC Sync, a critical feature demanded by the market. (A little oversight corrected by the folks at Palm, who built an OS with a fraction of the Newton's power abut achieved much more success.)
Michael Gartenberg is vice president of strategy and analysis at Interpret, LLC. His weblog can be found at gartenblog.net. Contact him at gartenberg AT gmail DOT com. Views expressed here are his own.





















@rhonavi
just curious: what's a "subjective means"?
Don't forget Windows CE! >_
@(Unverified) Well done Captain Obivious
@(Unverified)
Apple Macintosh, Apple Newton, ...
Does this fanboy Gartenberg know anything else apart Apple? Sounds like he's too narrow-minded.
I realllly don't like this guys articles
is it just me?
I mean I understand why engadget posts them but....
@(Unverified)
Hmm, I guess I'm the opposite. I really enjoy these articles (not this one in particular, though).
@(Unverified)
Your not alone I really don't get why he's on here.
Gartenberg is a shill-for-hire he will for a price hype your product in a quasi journalistic nature or write reports to suite your needs. I think mostly he rearranges the words in press releases.
@(Unverified)
Hmm I guess you're right. He does seem like a journalist writing for a sponsor....
well he's got a good gig despite not being a true journalist
@(Unverified) totally agree. his articles always feel like stream of consciousness apple fanboyism.
@(Unverified)
Agreed. His Chrome OS article stole two minutes of my life. He's a donkey.
I don't care about big sales, I just want to know how many fat ladies are going to get trampled at the Walmart on Black Friday this year.
@HighestRanked.....
....that was in bad taste
and it left a bad taste in my mouth
and it's actually sad
@(Unverified) hey I don't mean to offend but it's true. Every year it's always the same story. Fat lady gets trampled at the Walmart doors or at the Macy's.
@(Unverified) You know what's sad? news like this one:
http://japantoday.com/category/crime/view/two-dead-babies-found-in-bag-on-kanagawa-river-bank
@HighestRanked
you know what's really sad? being gross and lonely. sorry.
@sorryIdontLIKEfruit well then I suggest you go out a little more and make new friends. Maybe find a hobby or join a club. And don't be gross, watch more happy shows.
@HighestRanked
weak. go back to writing "first!" on new posts. at least that's original.
@sorryIdontLIKEfruit dude if you liked fruit you wouldn't be this bitter. I recommend cheering up, it's Thanksgiving after all.
@HighestRanked
fail
@sorryIdontLIKEfruit no sir, no sir, no sir. You fail for trying to say I fail.
I am Highest Ranked after all.
Just saved $300 with Bing and Newegg.
@Sir Jimbob No way, me too! *high five*
I got a steal on a Logitech G11 and some memory. Newegg is the best.
@Sir Jimbob : thanks for adding to the conversation!
How much Engadget space do we have to waste learning about your Bagel Quest. I like Steak a lot but don't write it on top of every report I hand in.
It annoys me too
@project109x : perfect comment. thread closed.
@project109x : Thank you.
I've got to agree that Mr. Gartenberg's articles are bollocks. Clearly someone who finds his own wisdom deeply insightful, and clearly someone who believes that his VP position gives him some kind of wisdom worth passing on to humanity, but really there's f*** all there but hot air and handwaving.
I generally appreciate these column posts, but I'm not sure I understand the point of this one. So you're saying that if we go out tech shopping on Black Friday, regardless of anything else, we better at least make sure that we save some money on what we buy (criterium #3)? I think I and most of America are already on the same page on that one. :)
On a side note, I couldn't relate to the increase-in-productivity criterium very well, since many gadgets I buy these days are for entertainment, and therefore DECREASE my productivity. But that's not stopping me from going out and buying an untested, first-revision (but cheap!) Blu-Ray player in two days...
Hey Engadget,
How about adding user profiles with options like: Ignore a specific author? Filter content relating to Droid, XBox, Television, etc...
This author has got to go. His smug little blurb preceeding his every article is annoying to put it gently. I would love to filter this guy out of my internet experience.
Who the heck takes himself so seriously as to include a self centered comment about himself in EVERY blog post he makes???
To all who have been saying this "author" sucks,do be aware that the last time I insulted him my post was deleted and I wasn't able to post for a couple of days.
In other words,this guy is so arrogant that he can't handle criticism.
And for further measure I will repeat what was deleted the last time-
This guy is a complete and utter git as well as smegging ponce.
One must distinguish between a tool and a status symbol.
needo