<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[The picture of the sinking warship seems a bit callus. Unless its from a film or something?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fanman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 7:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  The pic looks like it was photoshopped.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brokensticks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 7:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@brokensticks  <br>What isn't shopped these days?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FAP FAP FAP]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 7:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>The ship is HMS Antelope which was sunk during the Falklands Conflict and involved loss of life! Bit of a bad choice on Engadets part if you ask me!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[davel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 8:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) No its real, HMS Antelope sinking 1982 Falklands War, 2 dead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steeve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 8:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess any ship sinking will bring unhappy memories to someone and certainly there were worse incidents during the Falklands war. Still, doesn't feel right to use a picture of a serious subject to illustrate a light-hearted point in an article.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave A]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@davel  <br><br>Oh come on.  Who cares.  This is just political correctness gone mad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) Just to clarify; that new picture is not the might of the royal navy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fanman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) Lighten up, Francis.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory Pius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[While Intel's MID is a failure, the concept most certainly is not. Just look at HTC HD 2, Nokia n900, and maybe even the iPhone, for examples of how something that is more than a phone and less than a computer is quite interesting indeed.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarig]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 7:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Sarig Those are all smartphones, not really MID's.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 7:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[I LIKE COOKIES, BUT I HATE MID DEVICES!!!<br><br>But seriously, isn't this just any smartphone on the market today? There is not THAT much a leap between an iPhone/Droid/Palm/etc internet and a netbook's internet.<br><br>There is no market for something between a smartphone and a netbook unless the thing was priced for under $50...otherwise you could get an iPhone 3G or Pixi or what have you for $99. There is no demographic to buy a MID device, period.<br><br>...but I still like cookies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 7:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those are all smartphones.  A MID is like a smartphone without the phone function.  It's a stupid market because they all come out being less functional than a smartphone, but just as expensive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CtrlBurn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 9:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@I Like Cookies <br><br>I doubt MIDs (or smartbooks) will ever take off.  The combination of a smartphone which goes with you everywhere, and a netbook that can go just about everywhere else, is what works for most people.<br><br>MIDs and smartbooks are niche products, because MIDs don't have the display real estate that people need, and smartbooks not running a full OS, be it Windows or Linux, are kind of pointless.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Strangis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 11:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[AKA: The Coalition of The Willing.<br>Well at least Kazakhstan is still staying the course. There may still be hope for the MID East's war on our wallets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 7:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[@swanle<br><br>You pretty much described what a netbook is. And, yes, it is proven that netbooks sell. :-/<br><br><br>Netbook > MID > Smartphone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 8:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[that is a royal navy ship sinking during the falklands war. get rid of the picture, engadget. tasteless. quite a few people died there. seriously...weak.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 8:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those vendors simply move to the ARM architecture and rebadge their products as "smartbooks".<br><br>For example: The ARM Cortex A9 has comparable processing power to the new Atom line but consumes fraction of the energy. The new gen Tegra will be based on this architecture too.<br><br>In the MID/smartbook category, it makes much more sense to use ARM at the moment, especially if you want to ship with Linux and want to sell around 200$ (that mostly guarantees volume shipments).<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sola]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[Please release my UMID M2 before closing up shop. I've been waiting long enough! I'm a gadget freak though, so I can see why it would be hard to get a normal consumer to pay extra money for a pocketable form factor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Minions]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 10:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow the falkland war wasnt that long ago. <br><br>I guess the next big consortium/alliance/company that goes under we will see an image of one of the world trade towers collapsing attached to engadgets reporting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jojo_Mojo_Frak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[p.s. i mean i get the whole battle of mid-way allusions and such. but the image used wasnt even from that battle.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jojo_Mojo_Frak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 10:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Members abandoning Intel's MID alliance? Hopefully.]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/members-abandoning-intels-mid-alliance-hopefully/</guid><description><![CDATA[The War for the Falkland Islands wasn't that long ago? In cosmic terms, I guess... the war took place in 1982! That's 27 years ago, chum. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregory Pius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 12:25PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
