<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</guid><description><![CDATA[testing first post]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[raghav]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 8:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</guid><description><![CDATA[i will wait for better pic quality:(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GeekGirl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 9:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</guid><description><![CDATA[I received the S60 as a gift last year and had to sell it after a couple months as the image quality was absolutely terrible. Whoever is at the helm of Nikon's P&S division needs to be released back into the wild. The two largest complaints about the S60 were its image quality and the fact that it was overdependent on touch operation, nice to see they fixed neither issue and instead added more bullet points. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Riles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why on earth do I want to put my fingers on the display?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why do the majority of Nikon P&S Cameras suck? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</guid><description><![CDATA[Probably because Nikon doesn't take the P&S market serious. They figure those worried about image quality will just buy one of their dSLRs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 5:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</guid><description><![CDATA[What do you expect? 12MP on a tiny camera? Nikon still doesn't get it. At least the competitors are moving towards less MP and/or better low-light sensitivity (Fuji's EXR, Canon's S90, etc). As for Nikon, they rather spend their money on Ashton Kutcher instead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nikon Coolpix S70 review: excellent spec, but mediocre image quality]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/30/nikon-coolpix-s70-review-excellent-spec-but-mediocre-image-qua/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sexy but vapid, eh?  That explains why Ashton Kutcher is in all the advertisements.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ManekiNeko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 30th 2009 4:04PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
