<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would be nice if the cameras on our phones were good enough to make point-and-shoots obsolete.  All these megapixel increases are kind of useless when the optics on these phones aren't getting any better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luffy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Luffy What about that giant iPhone lens?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheesus Crust]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 7:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Luffy Modern Nokias, do often beat out basic digital cameras. The N95 is better than a few cameras I have now for pics and video]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[digitallysick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Cheesus Crust  <br><br>Those lenses give you the option of having different focal lengths,  but at the end everything is still going through the low quality lense in the camera,  which hurts sharpness,  clarity,  and color immensely]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luffy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Cheesus Crust  just because the hole in the case is half an inch in diameter doesnt mean the actual lens is bigger than a pinhole.<br><br>but agreed, the picture quality of the 3gs is quite good for a phone camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Luffy <br>that's cuz good glass cost money and manufacturers want the build of materials to be as inexpensive where possible since it's a phone not a camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 8:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Everyone on the planet,<br><br>It'd be awesome to have a standard for the image quality all camera phones offer.<br>I loved my 3.15mp Sony Ericsson K790 camera. <br>Ever since i changed my phone to a Nokia 5530 XM for its attractions, its 3.15mb camera is no match for the older one. The pictures are blurry and indoor they are worse. I wish we had a standard so phone makers wouldnt market phones with big MP numbers that have poor picture quality otherwise.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AbbasJin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 11:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope the this pans out<br><a href="https://www.communicationsdirectnews.com/do.php/150/36148?199" rel="nofollow">https://www.communicationsdirectnews.com/do.php/150/36148?199</a><br><br>I remember reading a while back, here in Engadget, about UCSD or CSUSD (I think was one of the universities in San Diego, but could be wrong). They were working on lenses to focus the light from a larger area, it kinda looked like the mirrors on disco balls in a bigger area of the phone, the sensor was the same. Then again, I have bad memory, could be fever hallucination.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xtasi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[There needs to be a more communicative way of describing relative sensor sizes, most cellphone cameras use either 1/4" and 1/6" sensors, but the 1/6" sensors are twice as large in surface area.<br><br>Some cameras like the cybershot cellphone can use point and shoot sensors that can be as large as 1/1.6" (which is 10 times as large a sensor as a 1/4").<br><br>Right now we are using megapixels, and measuring sensor size in fraction of an inch isn't very representative of relative sensor size.  Neither are representative of the quality of picture you take.<br><br>Sensor size is important because the 1/4" sensors are so small they have an infinite depth of field, and don't require AF, but lack in picture quality, larger sensors have better performance.<br><br>Hopefully, such a system can be carried over to point-and-shoot cameras as well.  Megapixels are a silly metric, a 12MP cellphone cam shouldn't be compared to a 12MP Nikon D3 or 10MP Canon 1DMkIII.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Monkey Fetish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 7:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Monkey Fetish <br>So you are saying there should be some initiative to get a formalized quality indicator, let me for giggles called it i3a.<br>Clever thought of you, what made you think of that?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 3:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry about being a bit mean, but for many people that use cameraphones all those details mean little, they have no clue what a sensor is what the size means etcetera, and I'm sure you know that you can ruin the best sensor in the world with a lousy lens and such, so to list all those details is deceiving too.<br>And then there's the interface to the sensor, and the colordepth, I've seen cameras on phones that I swear can't be 24bit, the pictures (bright daylight ones) look like it's 256 colors that are dithered (and I'm talking sony phones here), and I mean viewed on a teal monitor not some dithering caused by the phone display.<br><br>Talking of sony, they are member too, which makes me distrust this initiative.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Space matters in digital cameras.  The more room you have for optics and sensors, the better quality you can get. I'm hoping that as the other parts of phones get smaller, manufacturers start giving the cameras more space inside the cell phone housing for better optics and bigger sensors.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 8:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Could we get this for laptop webcams too please. The quality is all over the place right now and of course you can't tell just by looking at the megapixels. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PegasusBites]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 8:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do they really need an "Initiative" for this? Fact is, super tiny sensor + xxx megapixel + plastic unprotected highly scratchable lens = super duper crap. Are the executives of these companies too dumb to figure that out?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 8:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pika2000 <br>The initiative is to FIX all of the things you just pointed out...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PBB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 9:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[can you dumb it down a little]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richard roundtree]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 10:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dwight <br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14rZ8My2o-k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14rZ8My2o-k</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aznofazns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 10:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google and Microsoft join I3A's Camera Phone Image Quality Initiative]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/google-and-microsoft-join-i3as-camera-phone-image-quality-initi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Google Cameraphone MUST HAVE!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pankomputerek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 6:40PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
