<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[Christopher Walken has a fever, and the only cure is more apps.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lando Calrissian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 4:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lando Calrissian<br><br>I gotta have more apps, baby!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 7:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Lando Calrissian I love that pict...too funny<br>LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex DeWolf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[Christopher Walken as The Continental says: "Sit down, a beautiful woman such as yourself could use some apps... and some champan-ya"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Please]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 5:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[MORE COWBELL!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tehslax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 5:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tehslax Cowbell, there's an app for that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 9:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[How the hell can a CPU that runs a general purpose OS have an SDK??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 5:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kurian That is the irony!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[r3loaded]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 5:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, the Atom has its own architecture, but also runs x86 instructions (albeit, very slowly).<br><br>The Atom's native instruction set is known as LPIA (Low-Power Intel Architecture), and it's even been abandoned by Ubuntu (who used to maintain complete, separate builds of Ubuntu Linux compiled for LPIA for their Netbook Remix distributions).<br><br>This may be why Intel is pushing for the SDK.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elranzer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 9:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kurian <br>with difficulty]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[insomniac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 2:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[Christopher Walken is not a pro-Android, Christopher Walken is a Android.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magallanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 5:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is this needed at all?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 5:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[They want to make money selling stuff that's normally freeware?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 6:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Paul <br>Because moblin is not microsoft. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[insomniac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was thinking about this the other day. The idea to develop specially netbook optimized software isn't bad. Many programs at this time assume minimal screen resolution of 768, which most netbooks lack. Also, the somewhat less powerfull Atom would benefit from less resource hogging apps. To such end, I can't see anything wrong with Intel releasing an SDK to help budding developers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarska]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 6:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[So great. Now I can pay for software that I've already bought, but... It's optimized for crappy hardware!<br><br>It's the most wonderful time...OF THE YEAR!!!<br><br>/sarcasm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan K.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 6:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd like to share some of the vision: An overarching goal of the Intel Atom Developer Program is to help create an ecosystem of applications for netbooks -- to drive new innovative uses plus applications specifically designed for the netbook size and portability. (as Jarska noted).  Intel is also building an app store framework upon which OEM partners will have app stores for developers to sell their applications to netbook consumers (and sell software components to other developers). <br><br> The features of the Intel Atom Developer Program beta SDK announced yesterday include authorization, crash reporting, a consumer store client emulator for testing, license management and revenue management -- all features required to load the applications into the app stores, so they will be "store ready" when the stores open in 2010.  There is an existing Moblin SDK for optimizing Moblin apps, as well.   <br><br>-- Amy from Intel]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ABarton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ABarton Since netbooks run regular desktop apps, and I suppose regular desktops run netbook-optimized apps very well. I mean, I understand you want your own AppStore and the virtually free money that goes with it, but seriously, you think people will not only develop separate applications for just one of your processor families, but also for a specific Linux distribution running on just one of your CPU families?<br><br>As I see it, limiting it to Atom is a death sentence for the whole platform.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 6:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel brings out Atom SDK wanting more apps, acts oblivious to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/03/intel-brings-out-atom-sdk-wanting-more-apps-acts-oblivious-to-w/</guid><description><![CDATA[Need more apps? There's an app for that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[leg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 3rd 2009 11:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
