<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[and in this corner, weighing in at six cores, 32 nanometers, two billion transistors...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ajay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm rooting for NVIDIA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MLO <br><br>Same if Nvidia's GPGPU actually turns out to be as good AMD and Intel are in trouble.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[INTERNET SUPERHERO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MLO <br>I think we all are.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[buttons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MLO <br><br>Whoops my mistake I meant to talk about the processor Nvidia's new architecture for it's cards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[INTERNET SUPERHERO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MLO <br>I'd say fuck them all, FTC especially.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smok]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MLO <br>Intel seriously needs to lighten up and stop being a scrooge to other companies one of these days it could turn into a GM and belly flop]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 9:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xconan  <br>Intel can suck it.<br><br>I boycott their products because of their arrogance/anticompetitive actions towards AMD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Entourage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2009 1:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[YES!!!  I for one am happy to hear this.   Especially with the delays that came shortly after the lawsuit with Nvidia's GPGPU.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[INTERNET SUPERHERO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>Whoops meant to talk about the processors coming out not the cards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[INTERNET SUPERHERO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why can't we all just get along?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[martynmcfarquhar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) Because of intel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bleek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) LEAVE INTEL ALONEEEEE!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)<br><br>LOL I see what you did there....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 7:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[This has been a years-long cockfight, crescendoing into what will ultimately lead to a slap on the wrist to Intel.  Everyone knows they use their near infinite power to quash those they consider their biggest threats.  Apparently it's much easier than actually providing decent integrated graphics on your own chipset.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bhsx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am still trying to boot from my Matrox card!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glamajamma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[exectedly isn't a word, spell check ftw ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Resputan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Resputan <br>U R 2 Kewl]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CtrlBurn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@CtrlBurn  <br>Neat, I was trying to be one of the Engadget cool kids, glad I finally made it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Resputan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Resputan Well, "Exect" is a word; meaning to cut off, or cut out. While "Exectedly" isn't a proper use of the root word, his meanings are understandable when reading the root word's definition.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Resputan <br>i wasn't even able to finish reading the article i was so baffled by what exectedly could have meant. I'm pretty sure engadget underlines incorrectly spelled words like engadget for instance is utterly wrong.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loonyx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 10:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sigh...Oblige intel to give up its anti-competitive stance by opening x86!! Only reason they are as big as they are, due to their monopoly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[amorbis1001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@yor1001 You're right on one part, yes, one of the reasons they're as big as they are is because they're a monopoly. However, every firm strives to become a monopoly. If you can, why not? Wouldn't you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Nguyen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 10:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol, I can't pick  side on this since I am BOTH an AMD + ATi fan.  So I don't really like either company.<br><br>But I guess if I had to choose one to win this suit, it would be nVidia.  Intel is a giant anyways.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drybones5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[So we are on the same graphical page here aren't we?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fan-of-iTech]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a 8800gt, and a q660, so i use products from both companies, but what intels been doing with the atom processors is plain dirty... Selling them with the gpu cheaper than standalone so companies don't use ions processors in their laptops.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nimer_55]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 10:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on FTC moseys into Intel / NVIDIA dispute]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/04/ftc-moseys-into-intel-nvidia-dispute/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Nimer55 <br><br>Business is rarely clean...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Krcmaric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2009 11:39PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
