http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/ Engadget Comments for Chromium OS gets unofficial 64-bit port http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 1:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 2:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 1:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/
I dislike this new design more and more every day. For one, hidden comments need to go, the javascript on page needs major performance tweaks (I profiled it in firebug and they are calling some functions (like isXML) is called 78,000+ times which is unacceptable...]]>Dec 7th 2009 1:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 1:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/
I love everything but the serif fonts, but they don't want it to change, for this long, I'm kinda used to it. but I hope somday a miracle would come true,]]>Dec 7th 2009 1:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/#latest]]>Dec 7th 2009 1:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 2:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 1:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 6:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/
Its great for people who want to support more than 3gb RAM on a netbook in an attempt to compensate for the slow processor speed (not that this does too much... but their is a demand)

And about the site - I'm also not really enjoying the new style. The features are great, but the font / design isnt nearly as user-friendly as it was before. Also - why did the older posts button switch sides? I get that its supposed to be like a book - but lets pretend that the new posts go in the front of the book - so you turn the page forward to see the older stuff. ]]>Dec 8th 2009 1:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/
I've tried a few variants I've found out there and I just don't see why anyone would use it. Even the beyond basic user who just wants to use the internet and doesn't want to buy an OS, I'd still send them to Linux before Chrome OS.

And to find out that Chrome OS will not be available for easy download onto an existing machine, but you need to buy a computer with it preinstalled is a joke. Maybe this will change in the end, but seriously ... ]]>Dec 7th 2009 1:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/
Who did?]]>Feb 2nd 2010 11:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 1:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 1:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 2:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/
I'm not suggesting that a real OS wouldn't benefit from 64-bit. I run 64-bit Windows 7 with 8 GB of RAM and find it really useful that I can allocate 3GB of RAM to my virtual machine without worrying about resources in my dev environment.

But this is ChromeOS we're talking about here.
]]>Dec 7th 2009 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 8:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 1:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/
http://www.chromiumos64.com/

It's at the bottom of the article ... ]]>Dec 7th 2009 1:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 1:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 1:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 2:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 3:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 3:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 2:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Thank you.]]>Dec 7th 2009 8:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 2:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/Dec 7th 2009 6:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/
Ubuntu is 700MB.....]]>Dec 7th 2009 7:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/chromium-os-gets-unofficial-64-bit-port/http://bit.ly/acer-chromium-2010, Anyway it's always good to hear an update. On a new beta-program like chromium. You can't deny the idea that people are still skeptical on injecting it on their netbooks.

]]>Dec 7th 2009 8:59PM