<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can I watch my 1080p content in epaper mode?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 5:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, at 0.25 fps. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually at whatever framerate it's encoded in, since it's actually not REALLY e-ink. I assume they wanted to make a comparison of quality to e-ink screens, but it's pretty deceptive since it's just an LCD that can be frontlit by the sun or whatever other light source is around. They've actually been around longer than backlit LCDs, so it's not a new technology at all, but it might be the first time someone's made one that has both capabilities.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisk1590]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ChrisK15  <br><br>Not really... so called "transflective" LCDs have been around for many years. Though compared to those that have come before it, the reflective state with the Pixel Qi technology seems to have much better contrast.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 7:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[...I could see an Apple tablet/ebook reader using one of these...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brentt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fattycheesecakes That's exactly what I was thinking. I wonder who their "customers" are.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[keptin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kep  It's not Apple.  There have been reports that they have been in talks with a second tier eBook reader manufacturer (can't remember who at the moment) which is much more likely than Apple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tacitus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  <br>How do you know it's not Apple, d'you work for them.<br><br>I'm just thinking the Apple tabley has to have some nifty trick or else what's the big deal?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Philbury]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2010 3:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[YAY!  But really, do we have to wait until CES?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerrrg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[40 hours on a netbook, how long could one of these make my iphone's battery last?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bazooka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@aaronaut<br><br>Bout 41 hours]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfticket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 7:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Entourage eDGe desperately needs to use these... could combine both screens into 1, possibly :-)<br><br>That, and the MOTO AMP 10.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[They need to make dirt cheap televisions for developing countries. I was in one recently and I noticed that 13 inch black and white TV's (yes B&W) were $50 which is about a half month's salary. <br><br>If these displays are so cheap to crank out .. they could easily sell a huge amount of these in Africa and India etc.<br><br>Surely they could make $20 TVs that could run off solar or battery power if need be.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JS Think again. An 11 inch Sony XEL-1 costs USD$1700. And this ain't no TV discussion. This is tablets we're talking.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[microshaftsux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2009 12:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, this is not actual eInk; it's just an LCD with no backlight?<br><br>Is it a .... "super-twist" display?  LOL<br><br>Seriously, eInk is NOT the same as a non-backlit LCD.  We've had those!  Your watch or calculator probably is one.  There have been many non-backlit LCD eReaders (they've all failed too) already.<br><br>I don't see the innovation here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Reflective LCD technology has improved a lot since then. Just look at the Jetbook. But this has a backlight; It's a transflective LCD, though with contrast seeming to rival the best reflective LCDs. It also isn't meant for dedicated ebook devices, but rather netbooks and other multipurpose devices. Applications where eInk would fail miserably because of its slow response rate and lack of color.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 7:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plothole  <br><br>Thanks for the clarification... then I will retract my call for e-ink within the hardware (see below, not above).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Please Forgive Me]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 8:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) I'd say the innovation obvious.  It's in the end result of the outdoor display.<br><br>Why do you read engadget?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Strangis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 9:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Me likie<br><br>Crap, the cool technology reduced me to child speech.<br><br>Gimmie, gimmie, gimmie!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Holy crap they have that screen in a U100 MSI WIND!!!! I would love to DIY that screen on my Wind. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ninja sherman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 6:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love it.  I have been praying for a cheap version of this sort of technology for a while.  I hope they decide to mass market the product at a reasonable cost, and make it ubiquitous rather than keep it high priced and exclusive.  It's much needed in every electronic device.  If the backlight off mode could be real e-ink technology or just as legible / good for the eyes, who could ever complain?  It's a win.  I can't wait.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Please Forgive Me]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 8:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lots of times in life I would gladly give up color for a bunch more hours of juice. Heck, I bet 85% of the time I don't use color on my netbook.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[v]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 8:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[this would be perfect for apples tablet. hopefully the screen doesn't cost $500 on it's own.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RadicalxEdward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 8:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[What makes this different from the transreflective screens on the Thinkpads?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigcow05]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bigcow05 Pixel Qi originally started developing the 3Qi technology for low end machines like the OLPC, and apparently to add the feature to a standard LCD costs very little (in the tens of dollars range).<br><br>I'm not sure what the difference is between that and the ThinkPad technology, except for the fact that you can only get the ThinkPad SuperBright in, well, a ThinkPad.<br><br>I haven't seen a direct comparison between the two, but from separate demos, 3Qi looks to have more contrast outdoors, with the sacrifice of seeing even less colour.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Strangis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 9:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bigcow05 <br>They are similar in some ways, but Pixel Qi seems to be a more refined technology for outdoor viewing compared with currently available solutions.  One of the videos Charbax posted some time ago gave a little demonstration of an early Pixel Qi model compared to a Toshiba transflective notebook display, with quite an advantage going to the former.<br><br>The goal is to approach e-paper levels of readability in ambient lighting conditions, sacrificing overall color response in the process.  They admitted some time ago to lack the "white" of e-ink (which actually isn't very bright in the first place, only about 60-80% as bright as paperback paper), but I don't know if they've discussed the black point in reflective mode, or if/how OS-based font smoothing techniques can be tweaked (or disabled) for optimal font viewing.<br><br>Still very cool possibility for devices.  Between this, Mirasol, and Liquavista, with other possible competing techs out there as well (even the LCD tech in the JetBook is quite OK and could be developed to much higher resolutions), I'm somewhat hopeful for the future of daylight-readable, battery-friendly devices without the tragic limitations of currently available e-ink.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BubbaJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 10:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pixel Qi ramping production lines, multitouch (40-hour?) tablets at CES]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/07/pixel-qi-displays-hit-production-lines-in-january-multitouch-4/</guid><description><![CDATA[i hope this thing make it's way to viliv s10 alongside with some ulv power sipping monster.<br>why isn't this news breaking?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chhh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 7th 2009 4:25PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
