<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its about time]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sooperfli8791]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sooperfli8791 Too little, too late.  Honestly.  I may download it and try it but I have no real reason to drop my two main browsers I'm already comfortable with.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dragngt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dragngt  <br>That is true.. Firefox suites me just fine, and I hate importing all of my bookmarks and such. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sooperfli8791]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sooperfli8791 Firefox, for me, has become to slow.  I'm glad they finally came out with Chrome for Mac/Linux.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[181]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[Typo on extension *exension]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ciancrobbo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ciancrobbo : don't be extra smug.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks nicer in Windows than in OSX, in my opinion. Having the tabs start slightly to the right looks sorta odd to me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pcwolff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't be UI hatin']]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pcwolff I'm going to have to agree, it just isn't done very nice in OSX and it feels out of place with other apps.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@pcwolff I have to disagree, but that's just because I'm a Mac user and naturally feel more comfortable with such designs. Although it does look odd with the tabs a little more to the right, I assure you that it is only in the appearance that it is odd, it's perfectly functional as it is.<br><br>I would've appreciated slightly more 'Macish' buttons, which is only really aimed the the back/forward buttons and the close buttons on the tabs, which turn a rather unsightly red when hovered, but I'm sure that, in time, someone will fix that, if Google doesn't. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jamiepgs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 4:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[umm.. I'm still waiting for the official version of the browser..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) Keep in mind Google's habit of calling things Beta that most companies would call 1.0.  It's probably fine to use on a daily basis.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Zweben  <br>that totally makes sense<br>I think i'll go ahead and get it downloaded lol<br>thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm, if Chrome get some advanced tabbing and mouse gesture extensions Google may have taken over another part of my life...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[D.J.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DJ <br>Install BetterTouchTool it really helps my workflow. You can customize your whole Mac to your heart's content. I have four finger tap to maximize windows (actual maximize), three finger swipe up for new tab, three finger swipe down for close tab. And it's free!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bootareen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 5:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DJ I use ChromePlus which has built in mouse gestures and adblock.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[irdepesca]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MrAffrox  BetterTouchTool is really great. Constantly getting updated with new features and bug fixes too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hotrod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 7:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been using Safari as my primary browser since it came out.  This is the first browser other than Safari that I can actually see myself using full-time.  I hate the toolbar layout in the newest version of Safari, Chrome gets it right, plus it's getting extensions.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Zweben Plus, it handles Flash much better than Safari]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sirthought]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sirthought  What's wrong with Safari's Flash support?  I thought the entire point of Flash was that, as a plugin, it worked the same across browsers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Zweben<br><br>i've been using safari for like a month now just to see what it's like (normally a firefox user) and there are a few of things that are pushing me back to fox:<br> - keyboard shortcuts like ctrl+w or ctrl+tab stop working erratically (bug, other 2 are missing features)<br> - when i move my cursor on top of a href, i don't get notified where the link leads<br> - the address bar's autocomplete is an infant compared to firefox']]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joppe karhunen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mrqs  <br><br>If you want to see where a link leads, select "Show Status Bar" from the View menu.  You'll get a bar at the bottom that shows URLs as you hover over links.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sirthought  <br>I've always wondered what the hell that was about as well.. I used to use Safari on a daily basis, but random YouTube videos started doing my nut in - especially the HD ones. Firefox handles it like a trooper, and I haven't turned back since - which is a shame, since I love the history/bookmarks/top sites grid thing on Safari.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shash450]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 5:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Zweben ("...plus it's getting extensions")<br>Correction: extensions are "on the way". Judging by the past, that means late 2011 at best.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shunnabunich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Shunnabunich  ok. im using them right now though. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 7:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChazClout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jeez. I can't even download it. I feel like I'm the only one =[]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cjcamilla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hopefully Chrome extensions won't slow down the browser like Firefox extensions have a bad habit of doing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagamer43]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[not going to lie, never thought this would happen esp. when the chrome OS was announced.<br><br>looking forward to putting this up against firefox on fedora when i get home<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dunn <br><br>I've had a pre-release running on my netbook on Ubuntu for a while.  It runs very smoothly.  Though between the two on a full-featured machine, the speed is fairly similar.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorvay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jorvay  Yeah little touch and go on load times early on...i'll give it a day to cache some stuff, but early on firefox is still numero uno]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 6:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[i have been using it for about 4 days...absolutely awesome.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jordan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[on ubuntu 9.10]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jordan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jordanice77 I just switched to linux, ubuntu distro, a few days ago :D<br><br>Nice to know chromes here!  I have't really been too big of a Chrome fan, but i'll check it out anyways ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[manifest3r]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jordanice77  hey is your java plug-in working in your chrome? chrome doesnt recognize mines even though it works in firefox. im also using 9.10]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jay jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meh.  I like most of chrome, but i won't be switching from firefox until they get an adblock add-on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[herk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@herkPRIME They have one, it just sucks. In my experience it only blocks, at best, 50% of advertising. Flashblock for Chrome has an even worse record. It seems to only block useful flash, not the flash I don't want in the first place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danial]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@herkPRIME I prefer FireFox for the Ad-Block feature too. We already have to deal with too much marketing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sirthought]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@herkPRIME <br>I'll say the same to you two.<br>I'm using adthwart. Its got no options but it uses easylist and its working.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris120890]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kris120890  hmmm...i'll have to check that one out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[herk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@herkPRIME<br><br>I wonder if we'll ever see a good ad blocking extension for Chrome. After all, this is Google we're talking about...they'd be taking a huge cut into their own advertising. Firefox doesn't have that problem.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paradigm1220]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@paradigm  That's exactly what i'd figured as well.  Google wouldn't love cutting out their bread and butter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[herk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@herkPRIME<br><br>Chrome has had an Ad Blocker since version 3 came out more than 6 months ago:<br><br><a href="http://adsweep.org/" rel="nofollow">http://adsweep.org/</a><br><br>It actually works much better than the ad-blockplus extension in Firefox.  Check out the comparisons down the page.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SirMasterboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 5:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[So far, I really like it. Simple interface and fast. Nice alternative.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shelterpaw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope they add RSS support soon and borrow Safari's ability to load a bookmark folder of RSS feed URLs as one combined feed.  I don't know if I can switch from Safari without that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Z.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Zweben As in <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/reader/</a> ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[finally !!!  im so happy i got the E-mail]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tonyae1989]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought Chrome was official for OSX all along. This is news.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[danny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love chrome for windows, I'm pleased that it is now available for Mac OS X & Linux]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mytey0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/google-chrome-hits-beta-for-mac-and-linux-extensions-available/</guid><description><![CDATA[Will google push to make a version of ChromeOS work on macs?  Maybe even older out of date macs on pre x86 architecture?  Would they get sued?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kjb434]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:52PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
