<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[yay! lets hope it doesnt eat too much of my wallet!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kev007]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 8:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kev007 <br><br>I'm not even sure it will eat any of your wallet: Amimon didn't manage to get their technology in Sony's latest designs (<a href="http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml;?articleID=221800392" rel="nofollow">http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml;?articleID=221800392</a>), so I'm not quite sure how or when this standard is actually going to become a product...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[j_g_puff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[DO WANT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just what I need for the computer in my kitchen, the TV in my second lounge and the TV in my bedroom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br>You have a computer in your kitchen? Are you a woman?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 2:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[yes. my keyboard is right next to my kitchen sink. it's also waterproof. and i type long, beautiful poems while washing my asparagus.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pencilmind]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wires are a thing of the past.  Everything will be wireless in the distant future.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Avaj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>As long as wireless is constrained / blocked by grounded metal structures wired will endure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't wait to see what Monster Cable tries to sell us now... Monster Air?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[@EJ it will try to convince us that cables carry 'clearer, more HD-ish signals', and that they are more secure.<br>LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pencilmind]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[@EJ <br>This monster Air carries better quality sounds and video by using gold plated air. It's a first in the industry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmidtdustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope WHDI (or something similar) gets to market soon.<br><br>Much sooner than PMF 1.0 (pigs might fly).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruprecht]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[Run google pictures for whdi and compare it with engadget s picture. <br><br>Tell me the difference....<br><br>Surprise, surprise...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[znoen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[@blade235 <br>yeah none of these houses have stairs!<br>good catch. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[diIIigaf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[@blade235 <br>haha iKnew it!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 10:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not only will our houses we wireless in the future, but also stairless.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mattpreston11]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mattpreston11 and first floors will float in the air.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evinyatar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 10:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[As long as it can pass though walls (2 at least) then my PS3 is FINE... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James DiBernardo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 10:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if it also transports people... if not how do you get upstairs in that house?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 11:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't want yet another connection standard. We should just have internet connections and use WiFi to stream HD video, audio, and data.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffzacharias]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 11:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmmm.<br><br>I appreciate the convenience but I'm still not convinced that surrounding ourselves with electric fields and radio waves is necessarily good for us.<br><br>Between worries about mobile phones, mobile phone masts and high tension electric cables supplying domestic homes I'd like to see more research done before going full steam ahead and surrounding myself with more wireless signalling in my own home.<br><br>Personally I prefer the dependability of a wired connection - and the latest 300mbps plug-in wall socket home networking devices work fine for me. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Multi-format-mayhem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[so, i'm guessing this is just another RF signal.  kind of a long shot that it will pass through walls that easily at full 1080p. why not use this tech to replace all old wireless standards, like bluetooth?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Bundy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like how the house has a bedroom, two living rooms, a kitchen, two floors, and no stairs. XD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oamey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WHDI specification hits 1.0 -- is this what wireless HD has been waiting for?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/08/whdi-specification-hits-1-0-is-this-what-wireless-hd-has-been/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interesting announcement, but sounds like more “market testing” to me.  Do they really have any products available now?  I haven’t seen any, but just saw some pretty cool looking WirelessHD products from Panasonic and LG in this weekend’s Best Buy/Magnolia insert.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nica]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2009 9:19PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
