<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[ I just wish they would stick to one name scheme, its like they try to confuse the end users....go ask the average joe, whats faster, core 2 duo, or i7....bet they wont get it right]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[From My Cube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@From My Cube <br><br>I think that's the point of this new naming system, 5 is better then 3, and 7 better then 5.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hexoDAT64]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hexoDAT64  Then they had to go mix it up with i7 9xx-series and 8xx-series.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ypoknons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@From My Cube<br>I actually like that they used name differentiations. It's not as though people who purchase via OEM or don't build there own rigs research what there going to to any reliable degree. Most only want to know, "Does that mean it's fast".<br><br>What i don't like, which i think was your point, is when companies use similar name assignments to their products, especially when they release around the same time. Nokia is notorious for doing this, and its one of the reason I don't purchase there products.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Truthbringer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@From My Cube <br><br>7 > 2 right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prophet of the Light]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[So what is faster QX Chips or iCore 3 or iCore 5???????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sea Urchin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Sea Urchin A QX9770or QX9650 will easily beat a dual core (Clarksdale) i3 or i5.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sneakz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Sea Urchin Well there haven't been any benchmarks for the i3 chips yet, but as far as i'm aware the i5 and i7 chips are generally faster than the QX series, with the exception being a few gaming benchmarks.<br><br>I assume the i3 will be around the level of what the Core 2 Quad's, and are simply a way for Intel to offer lower priced products on their newer motherboards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SarnGate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Sneakz  Clarkdale, not Clarksdale]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sneakz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[So.. WHY using NKOTB's picture for this post ?!?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mitcha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mitcha Who cares ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SarnGate]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SarnGate  I care.. MTF]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mitcha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mitcha <br>ya, and what member is going to be the i9?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kinger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tylersmyler  @dannywood ! ahahahaah]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mitcha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mitcha I think the better question is how did you know it was NKOTB?  That question aside, its a new product line for Intel aka 'a new kid on the block'.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[So when is the i9 silently slipping into the retail channel?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KAL326 sometime after intel milks the market dry with i7s. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prophet of the Light]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[The i9 isn't scheduled until 2010 (possible 2Q).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 11:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[so confused...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@One Love That tends to happen when you smoke weed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SomethingInMyFrontPocket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who says I smoke weed?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 2:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@One Love  <br>Well when it comes to comments on here, most seem to attach the personality of the avatar to the commenter.<br><br>So by that respect you smoke weed and worship Ja.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phoenix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[Somewhere along the line I missed how close 32nm was to production...<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cocoviper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope the HD bitstreaming stuff works as advertised]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GaryZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 1:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is this really going to be a worthwhile improvement over a C2Duo/ C2Q that already offer perfectly respectable or better performance at a good price? Can't they just produce a low speed i5 to run an a cheapo P55 mobo? The Intel marketing team is over-thinking the number of market tiers. The i3 segment buys almost entirely on price and barely pays attention to specs, so why bother with this redundancy?   <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[marc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's Core i3 530 processor up for order, still unconfirmed by Intel]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/intels-core-i3-530-processor-up-for-order-still-unconfirmed-by/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Marc B<br><br>i3 is the new Celeron, i5 is the new Core2 Duo, i7 is the new QX/Xeon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 5:39PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
