<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats actually very interesting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jasen Minus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jasenjr <br><br>Really? Why? Central tendency doesn't do justice when reporting some statistics. Example: If Bill Gates walked into a cafe in Seattle, then the average customer in that place would be a billionaire. Is that an accurate picture of the cafe's patrons? No, no it's not.<br><br>This study is worthless. It requires much more sophisticated data analysis than just calculating means. Moreover, how they chose to operationalize information ("as data that is delivered for use by a person") leaves much to be desired. Since when do phone calls, print, and tv accurately transfer into data? Crossing these very different mediums tells us nothing. <br><br>This study is rudimentary at best. At most, it tells us how the average American spends their time... and again, using means isn't the most robust way to report that data.<br><br>I'm embarrassed to see a University study produce such poor results...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  <br>And the point you bring is in itself interesting. It all depends upon the way things are presented, the sample, the time, the infinite amount of variables. No, this isn't accurate for everyone, and everything depends. That's why these things are "averages" and have "margins of error." ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cycomachead]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  I think phone calls and print probably transfer quite easily, I'm sure it would be possible to measure the data rate or a call, and surely text would be around about 1 byte/letter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maxwell Ash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 3:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jasenjr <br>This is actually one of the stupidest things I have ever heard of. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Super Haole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 4:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  No variance is reported. Sample sizes (not rates) are grossly disproportioned and central tendency doesn't account for weighted measures.<br><br>The points you bring up are in fact the problems that ultimately make this report worthless. Thanks for agreeing with me, even though you don't seem to want to be in that position.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[Either the IRS or cable companies are going to try to find a way to make us pay for this. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DTJ <br><br>for a second I thought I blacked out again and wrote that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 10:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DTJ : They'll impose bandwidth caps before we know it. We won't be able to watch news live because some can't get the channels due to throttling. lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ALBGunner04]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 10:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DTJ <br><br>Then when the time comes, don't upgrade to a cyberbrain.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UnReal31337]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 3:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jasenjr I agree... Stupid data stuff is pretty cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iWaffle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[in 3 years PC will be number 1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[google: Operation Northwoods]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@operation northwoods <br>Right, when all our download speed are at 1gb/s. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Special Agent Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@operation northwoods No, no it won't.   It will still be TV.  When now twenty-somethings and under are the majority, like in 10-20 years, then maybe.  Not in three though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 11:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Special Agent Steve  until the US decides to improve there infrastructure to match the rest of the developed countries we will not be seeing those speeds anytime soon. To think they are still offering dial-up I have not seen that advertised where I am at in over 5 years now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adamsterrence]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 5:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[Porn]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigsofty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[The data looks like it came straight from graphjam.com]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[r3loaded]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good thing we aren't like AT&T's network]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's a shame they didn't break down computer. It would have been interesting to see how much is porn.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[daytripper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[i would be curious to see how much bandwidth the average office worker uses - internally and externally, and the breakdown of both.  internally, exchange or mail server gets pounded with 100mb powerpoint files that get sent and saved as attachments.  externally, the tubes get clogged (/exaggeration) by farmville and facebook all day]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gerphimum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow movies and music are that small? as impossible as it is, i would love to see charts for individuals and compare percentages.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kojo87 I don't get how they count movies, seeing it almost always seen on a computer or TV screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  thats just it. they must be counting movies seen in the theater. i know most of the movies i watch are at home.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kojo87 <br><br>Yeah - I think its only movies in theater and on DVD.<br><br>Televised and downloaded films fit into the other categories - if they were included it would probably be a lot more.<br><br>Once blu-ray gets more popular I bet that stat would rise.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[M C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Why would Bluray make it rise? Do you think bluray will make people change their behaviour and start watching more.<br><br>I would think it would stay the same with bluray harvesting from the DVD distribution  channel]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cy Starkman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 10:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is stupid, why would you waste time making a number on how many gigabytes a human consumes a day?  What's the point?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[christopher hanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@almostkorean <br><br>Information is power.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 10:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@almostkorean <br>What the hell are you doing on Engadget?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ariel Horwitz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want this to make sense... I really do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Logan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is print considered data? How many bytes of information are in a newspaper?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  do you know newspapers are printed from files?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lpppppl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) a byte is essentially 1 letter of text. Obviously there are graphics in newspapers as well as some data for formatting, but for pure test 1 Byte per character is good measurement. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RandomGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 10:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want to know what math they are using. They have 1.7GB of phone conversations in there. I'd believe super high rates of TV consumption, as HDTV can be 10GB/hour, BUT you can't physically consumer 1.7GB of phone converstaions. AT&T uses a max of 8kbit/s for GSM conversations each way, so figure 16kbps total, which yields 1.3GB assuming that you talk TWENTY-FOUR HOURS A DAY. Realistically, a normal person would probably consumer no more than 100MB of phone conversations on a heavy talking day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br>It's counting words, not bytes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thethirdmoose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>If you look at the compressed bytes pie chart in the linked study, computer games are about 1/2, all TV is about 1/3, and the rest totals about 1/6, with phone at only 0.04%]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thethirdmoose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@thethirdmoose: If you count words, it would be like 10KB for an entire day of talking. It just makes no sense.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>I believe it is referring to all material accessed by a phone.<br><br>So, if you have an smart-phone, it would include all the data for mail, web, and maps, as well as photos, music and movies accessed on the phone. That adds up quick.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[M C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@M C  <br><br>Smart phones have nearly nothing to do with useage of 1.7GB/day. Most carriers "unlimited plans" are capped at 5GB/month.  Even if a user maxes their 5GB/month, so they do are limited to an maximum average of 0.16GB/day based on the usage of every byte of the 5GB/month cap.  That leaves over 1.5GB/day unaccounted for.  Dont forget this is for the average american....who may or may not have a data plan for their phone.<br><br>IMO many of the values look inflated, unless the bitrate of radio is huge, I find it hard to believe the average american consumes 3.6gigs of radio a day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hilltop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 11:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Hilltop  Yup. Even I as a power user only uses maybe 10MB/day, on some days I probably only use a few KB, even if you include everything on my phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[We have a pie chart to tell us Americans love to consume? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spaz_1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br>Yes, considering consumption is necessary to life. Obviously, if you've never consumed you must be a day old, and starving. Here, have a cookie!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Special Agent Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 9:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good thing our minds aren't running on Comcast or ATT wireless]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[digitallysick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[i just pooped 34 gigabytes, thats nothing]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[greggo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@greggo <br>On a good day i can poop 160gigabytes, Compressed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AbbasJin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 2:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gigabytes is a pretty meaningless measure of information. Does a 50gb blu ray really contain 50 times as much information as the 1gb divx version of the same film? If I read a 5 page article and it's only 20kb, does that make it relatively worthless?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[david]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@demand depends on what you're trying to look at.  this shows how much information people got movin' over the tubes.  on the flip side of your argument, is streaming a 10 minute 1080p video over the internet less significant than that 50 page article?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maveric101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 12:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@demand:<br><br>In a way, yes.  The reason the divx is 1gb is due to compression.  Compression = less data, ie throwing out redundant data.  Take an uncompressed version and throw it on that 50gb disc and you've got more information.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 1:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jordan  If this were actually scientific, you'd be correct. But here, they're comparing a giant slice of radio (let's be generous and say 2 hours) against a 1.5 hour movie (which is incredibly teeny). The whole pie chart is comparing Apples to Oranges to BS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eptin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2009 3:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[AMERICA!!!!! F@&K Yeah!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MasterAndew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/09/study-finds-americans-consume-34-gigabytes-of-information-per-da/</guid><description><![CDATA[34 gigs? <br><br>We really cant help the bandwidth used for digital cable/sat TV, So I think that may skew it a bit to the high side.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Look_Around_You]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2009 8:27PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
