http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/ Engadget Comments for Intel's Atom D510, D410 processors get benchmarked http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 7:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 7:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/
It will be more interesting to see numbers for the netbook versions vs. N and Z-series Atom CPUs.]]>Dec 11th 2009 7:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/
Pinetrail is more of the same. Why can't Intel understand that even netbook/nettop users might want to watch some HD Hulu or Youtube?]]>Dec 11th 2009 7:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 7:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/
Because the goal for these chips isn't to make cheap laptops, its to compete with ARM in the mobile space. Intel would rather sell you a CULV which can handle HD video from YouTube and Blu-ray.

Notice how Atom chips are moving towards more of a system-on-chip approach with the GPU, memory controller, and CPU on the same chip. The next logical step is to integrate everything on die and then shrink it to where it can fit into a cellphone. This AnandTech article from 2008 provides some good info: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3254&p=1]]>Dec 11th 2009 7:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/
The N and D series Atoms use even weaker GPUs. Both of these new D series chips use the GMA3150, which is a slightly modified version of the antiquated GMA3100. It has no hardware accelerated media decoding whatsoever. Pinetrail is using the same thing.]]>Dec 11th 2009 7:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/
Flash is a different story, but flash eats donkey shit, I've had somewhat simple flash games use up an entire core on my Q6600 (at 3Ghz).]]>Dec 11th 2009 7:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/
Because software decoding can only do so much, and Adobe sucks and writing efficient software.]]>Dec 11th 2009 7:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 7:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/
I'm hoping for some netbooks with switchable Intel/Nvidia graphics, as the GMA's are quite simply crap for anything even remotely graphics heavy.]]>Dec 11th 2009 7:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 7:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 7:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 8:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 8:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 9:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/
WE'RE ALMOST AT THAT POINT. $60 and counting.]]>Dec 11th 2009 9:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 11th 2009 10:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 12th 2009 1:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 12th 2009 3:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 12th 2009 12:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 12th 2009 8:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/I found it here http://www.mini-box.com/D510MO-mini-ITX-Intel it's ~$100. What I like on this motherboard, beside Pine Trail CPU, it's a miniPCI express socket (I could put the Broadcom Crystal HD in it), it's fanless and what I don't liek it's the lack of HDMI port, only VGA :( and I can't use it at full capacity as a HD HTPC. But for a silent and fanless nettop with the right enclosure, it's a good motherboard.]]>Jan 3rd 2010 4:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Dec 21st 2009 7:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/intels-atom-d510-d410-processors-get-benchmarked/Jan 14th 2010 9:19PM