<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just bought a Caviar Black for $50 on sale. I love this drive! Don't forget they are dual processor. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmitt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Schmitty <br><br>It was 640GB, sorry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmitt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Schmitty How many GB was it? Link to the product to buy it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@werty1432k  oh ok]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[And here I am with my 160GB drive in my MacBook.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@werty1432k rules of engadget:<br><br>1. DO NOT talk about your mac on the blog - as u will get down ranked<br>2. DO NOT talk about your mac on the blog - as u will get down ranked<br><br>Im not gonna down rank you. Because i own one. (And yes i have W7 on it)<br><br>ON TOPIC: Me too, im tired of my 160GB in it. Gonna upgrade to 320 or 500GB ASAP]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IvanP91]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@IvanP91  <br>1. DO NOT tell others how to post - it will get you down ranked<br>2. DO NOT tell others how to post - it will get you down ranked<br><br>I won't down rank you because you have a mac<br><br>ON TOPIC: I would love to upgrade the storage but a RAM upgrade comes first (from 2GB DDR3 to 4GB DDR3) and then I guess the HDD.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@werty1432k  <br><br>hahahahahaha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorge]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 9:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@werty1432k <br><br>Multiple downrank FAIL!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShankThePotomus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just look at how beefy the internals of that hard drive is, oh why can't I have four of them in two RAID1 arrays]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fischju]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fischju NICE]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fischju No idea, if you mean because they don't support raid then all you have to do is run the TLER utility and turn TLER on, (instant raid edition). If it's money that is holding you back, sorry can't help with that, I am just as broke as you...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 1:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't get it. These drives are 7200RPM 2TB drives, but they cost $299 on Newegg. And yet, 2 1.5TB 7200RPM Seagate drives will cost you $240, you've got 1TB more space, and $60 more in your wallet!<br><br>Yeah, yeah, I know 1 drive is better, but it's not cost effective right now!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagamer43]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jeff Kibuule How is 1 drive better, I prefer mulitple drives, once you go raid you never go back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 1:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jeff Kibuule  They had the 2TB Hitachis on slickdeals two weeks ago for $115.<br><br>Sure its a five platter, but $300 for a 2TB is BS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 1:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jeff Kibuule Well actually if one of them stops working you still have the other one and know that you should backup the data pretty soon... thats kind of an advantage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Psygnosis2097]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2009 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can never have too much storage. You can fill up a 1TB drive with HD footage fast...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorge]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[What the heck is "enterprise drive" supposed to mean? More reliability? Does it boldly go where no drive has gone before?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[why does it have resident evil 4 in the name/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoho2200294]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 9:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[I viewed the benchmarks on hardware.com.  I can't really see how the minuscule speed increase is justified by it's higher price over the Seagate.  I understand it's faster but come on ... 5.65ms vs 6.02 in a full stroke access test, who's going to see that difference with out some type of synthetic benchmark? Doesn't justify it's increased price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisGray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 9:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ChrisGray <br>7.4MB/sec faster read speed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MacBandit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 11:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ChrisGray <br><br>Seagates have had absolutely dismal reliability the past couple of years/iterations. At this point I wouldn't trust my data to a Seagate drive regardless of the price. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MeanSpyvie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  It's actually 8.6Mb/s faster, which works out to slightly less than an 8% increase over the Seagate.  118.8 vs 110.2,  my point earlier was does this small speed increase justify it's price tag? In my opinion the drive should have a retail price of around $170 - 190, not $299.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisGray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 7:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MeanSpyvie  And before that Western Digital fell into the same category, they were the budget brand of HD makers with very bad reliability;  my point is that the drive costs too much for it's additional speed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisGray]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 7:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[if they're not sata 6...who cares?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loonyx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 10:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AM321CAN <br>I mean why hunk down 300 bones for a 2TB sata 3 when the seagate sata 6 (obviously backwards compatible with sata 3) is the same price...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loonyx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 10:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AM321CAN  <br><br>Because Seagate right now is not the drive to get, based on overall reliability.  Maybe next year...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 10:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AM321CAN <br><br>It's SATA 2 (3Gbps) and SATA 3 (6Gbps)... stop calling them SATA 3 and SATA 6 !!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[E71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow... 2010 is here and we are still in the 2TB limit. Guess the peak has been reached for at least the next 5 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ridgecity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 10:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>And actually these drives were first reviewed back in EARLY SEPTEMBER!  <br><br><a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=775" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=775</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 1:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[Geez! they were comparing WD's latest 2TB (@500GB/disc) to last generation Seagate 1.5TB (@375GB/disc)   It's not even apple-to-apple comparison.  They should have used a Seagate Barracuda XT 2TB at same 500GB/disc, released same time 2 months ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 10:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Warren Young <br><br>Benchmarks have been out for months now.<br>Anandtech compared the XT and 2TB Black here <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3668&p=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3668&p=2</a><br><br>and even on a SATA 6 Gbps controller WD Black was faster.<br><br>not a wd fanboy or anything, but all the benchmarks are clear regarding Seagate XT. the SATA 6 Gbps interface is purely marketing.<br><br>what we need is SSD on SATA 6Gbps!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AlexQ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 11:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlexQ5<br>Thanks for the link! ... agree that current hard drives aren't saturating SATA II, 3Gbps, quite yet but it's nice to see they are getting 6Gbps interface ready now.<br><br>Very interested to see a SSD, for sure. To design in the NAND parallelism necessary to meet 6Gbps will translate to $$$$ that I can't afford.  All SSD today also use RAM caching scheme to boost burst rate, their real sustain rate is only good but not great....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 12:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know what?  I think what we really need is a Prius - a hybrid drive.<br><br>No one uses full 2TB at a time. It's always just a working set of sectors that we access for a period of time.  One only needs enough Flash in a hard drive to get similar performance of a SSD but at a much lower cost.  I will go for a 2TB w/ 16GB flash for say $50 more if it have the SSD goodness at a heartbeat.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 12:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Warren Young Have you guys seen this?  The first SATA 6G SSD was tested and blows this stuff away!  <a href="http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=832" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=832</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm a WD fanboy. I have Black. Have had Raptors, but for me it was simple economics.<br><br>4 x 1.5 TB Barracuda's for $90 bucks each vs 3, 2 TB's @ $289 each.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Logboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2009 11:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) Or the Hitachi 5-platter 2TB drives for $115 each.   <br><br>Although the abundance of streaming porn online is making me question the point of my bulk purchase.  =p]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 1:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[They really should have compared these to the last (7200.12) generation of Seagate drives. I don't think it's fair to compare them to a more than 2 years old (7200.11) drive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AlCabone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 2:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would have preferred them comparing the drive to other 2TB drives as well, like HITACHI HD32000 and Seagate Barracuda XT.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mrberkut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 5:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not as fast as Samsung HD103SJ.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Suomaa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 8:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[I never quite got why they use caviar as name, that doesn't sound appetizing or speedy or reliable or flashy or cool in relationship to a HD in any way, strange choice.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wwhat <br><br>Sure it does! Caviar and a nice wine.... you are making me hungry!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2009 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WD's Caviar Black and RE4 2TB drives get benchmarked, one is wicked fast]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/11/wds-caviar-black-and-re4-2tb-drives-get-benchmarked-one-is-wic/</guid><description><![CDATA[ nice ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikhail V]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2009 7:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
