<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was pretty excited until I saw... "GMA 4500MHD".. ugh]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lifesavers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lifesavers Battery life is up to 9 hours on the X350, but MSI are keeping quiet on similar estimates for the X600 Pro.  No word on when either machine will go on sale, nor for how much<br><a href="http://bit.ly/msi-xslim-x350" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/msi-xslim-x350</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anthonypined]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2009 3:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[the hp dv2z is better it has a 1280x800 res<br>thats why i like it more]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 9:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@angelwolf To be fare its 1,366 x 768 (1049088) has 25088 more pixels then 1280x800 (1024000). That's %2.45 more, but i can understand how more vertical pixels are more useful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NeatOman  <br><br>The number of pixels does not always mean it is an advantage.  My screen is so wide (but not enough for 2 windows side by side) that I rarely, if ever, use all the horizontal pixels.  I do, however, use the vertical pixels and could most definitely use more.  In other words the "higher pixel count" is, in effect, less.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wowzers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2009 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NeatOman  <br><br>I need more vertical pixels, not more vertical pixels.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wowzers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2009 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wowzers  <br><br>Edit: not more horizontal pixels*<br><br>I need to start reading what I write before I click submit! =D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wowzers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2009 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[Problems with this are...1.) Graphics card (as mentioned), 2.) Resolution (weird?)..everything else is very nice though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nick k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[Imo these kind of netbooks will never be more than "just another one" till the manufacturers start to look more in to alternative graphics solutions like the ASUS 1201N. That's why the 1201N is so interesting to me. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 10:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kant <br><br>I just got the Asus UL30Vt-x1.  It has pretty much the same specs except it has discrete switchable graphics.  You can either use the integrated graphics (Intel 4500HD) or the discrete graphics (NVidia G210m)  and it gets 10 hours on battery.  I love it. exactly what I was looking for.  I was looking at the 1201N until I saw this.  Although it was more expensive.  Just FYI ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Panhandle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[plus it has DDR3 RAM]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Panhandle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 11:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Panhandle  Damn, I want that laptop badly but I got my laptop less than two years ago and it's way too early for me to get a new one. But why didn't people start using switchable graphics more before? And that UL30vt-foo-x-y-z (yay asus naming) is actually reasonably priced too. Hopefully by the time I'm ready for a new laptop this kind of thing will be much more common.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iofthestorm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Panhandle  Plus %33 overclock]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Panhandle  I feel the same way as you. I was waiting for 1201N and I am so glad it took so long cuz I am so in love with my ul30vt]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spillmyguts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2009 1:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[With the poor build quality of the previous x-slims and the lackluster specs on this new model,  this laptop better be $500 or less,  or you'd be much better off going with an Acer Timeline or ASUS UL and some of the upcoming Lenovos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luffy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looked really, good, then I thought wait, Blu-ray option with integrated GMA, and VGA output?  damn, they could have made it way better but using a better GPU and HDMI out]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Glitter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[will come in a choice of either an Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 or Core 2 Duo SU7300]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[More Info & Pics:<br><br><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=es&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msiwind.es%2F2009%2F12%2F14%2Fexclusiva-todo-sobre-el-nuevo-msi-x-slim-x350-nuevas-fotografias%2F" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=es&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msiwind.es%2F2009%2F12%2F14%2Fexclusiva-todo-sobre-el-nuevo-msi-x-slim-x350-nuevas-fotografias%2F</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RobVLC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on MSI slides out 13.4-inch X-Slim X350 CULV laptop]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/msi-slides-out-13-4-inch-x-slim-x350-culv-laptop/</guid><description><![CDATA[@angelwolf To be fare its 1,366 x 768 (1049088) has 25088 more pixels then 1280x800 (1024000). That's %2.45 more, but i can understand how more vertical pixels are more useful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2009 9:00PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
