http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/ Engadget Comments for UCLA nanowire discovery could lead to faster, stronger, smaller electronics http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Dec 15th 2009 10:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/
Yeah, I there we're all sick of the "could's" and are really looking for the "remember when chips were 32nm/batteries only lasted 7 hours/you couldn't travel in tubes?" era.

But seriously, I won't believe it til I see it- though it seems like in the future Carbon Nanotubes FTW.]]>Dec 15th 2009 12:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Isn't that a good thing?]]>Dec 15th 2009 1:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Dec 15th 2009 10:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/...been waiting on the redesign on this old item, but I'll stick to the clipped to belt phone for now. What? You're not expecting a shoe-phone are you? Airport security won't allow it. ;p]]>Dec 15th 2009 10:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Dec 15th 2009 10:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Dec 15th 2009 11:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Dec 15th 2009 11:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Dec 15th 2009 11:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Smaller electronics means less power consumed, which means the same sized batteries can last longer.]]>Dec 15th 2009 1:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Dec 15th 2009 11:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/"smaller electronics might mean more garbage..... now the microchips are so small nobody is trying to repair them, just replacing for a new one and the old one is - garbage"
Don't be a moron. It's always been impossible to repair microchips. The only way to "repair" a circuit board is to remove the bad microchips and replace them with new ones.]]>Dec 15th 2009 1:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Dec 15th 2009 12:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/really? I was in that class too. the guy is a complete tool.]]>Dec 15th 2009 12:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/And make movies about what's wrong with the environment and global warming or about US health care being fail (gore&moore), which again are just a movie versions of internet comments, or be in government or UN, again pretty pointless.]]>Dec 15th 2009 1:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/Dec 15th 2009 2:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/
or just stop being dumb.]]>Dec 15th 2009 2:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/I'm waiting for a guy from india to invent a smartness pill]]>Dec 15th 2009 3:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/
there is more money to be made in keeping you dumb.]]>Dec 15th 2009 3:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/]]>Dec 15th 2009 6:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/And I was making some tongue-in-cheek remarks really.
]]>Dec 16th 2009 2:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/
Luke]]>Dec 15th 2009 5:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/15/ucla-nanowire-discovery-could-lead-to-faster-stronger-smaller/
sorry....]]>Dec 16th 2009 8:07AM