<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Switched On: The camcorder strikes back</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Switched On: The camcorder strikes back</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[bow chicka wow wow]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[questionexclamation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@questionexclamation dang beat me :p]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amnak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 7:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[First to comment wow ...anyways... how is the quality on these flip cams and how is the quality on the Nanos ive never actually seen eithers video.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amnak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 7:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Amnak <br><br>Fail]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Name:]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 7:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[fabulous image.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ajay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SaintAndrew <br>only mega-geeks relate anything that contains "strikes back" with lightsabers/Star Wars. Haha!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iroq d. mullet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@iroq d mullet  <br><br>I hope you die painfully, BY THE POWER OF THE DARK SIDE! AHHHH HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yule&bellow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 9:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SaintAndrew<br><br>Agreed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plazmic Flame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kodak Zi8 > Flip Ultra HD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shash450]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool<br><br>Just commenting about the comment system again. What happened to all the replies? All I see are the parent comments and then the Next 50 comments link.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh yea...Don't reply to me because I won't be able to see it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Vman and now no one can see you]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[av8or]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 9:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[What the hell voted out of existence... any ways how good is the quality of the flip and nano? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amnak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Amnak The Flip Mino HD, the only one I've got experience with produces perfectly good 720p video, even in low light conditions.  The things to understand about it are it has NO ZOOM and it has NO IMAGE STABILIZATION.  So if you need to zoom in on your kid playing soccer, or its just too shaky where you are (in a car bouncing along a dirt road say), it ain't going to do the job.  If you play the video it takes on a large HDTV it will look fine.<br><br>The Nano isn't competitive with that.  Its 640x480 4:3 rather than the 1280x720 the Mino HD shoots, and its significantly lower quality.  But if you're carrying the Nano and you don't have the Mino HD with you...  Or you have a Nano and not a Mino, then you might find it adequate.<br><br>Both are obviously fine for producing Youtube video for the internets.  Both could use some work for shooting a wedding or your kid's game.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fanfoot  Errrr my Flip Mino has zoom. You just use the + and - buttons]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gavinsteele]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 11:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is Apple even a contender in the micro camcorder arena?  <br><br>For those interested, the big two players right now are the Kodak Zi8 and the Vado HD.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69 <br>Is it the Darth Vado?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KirinIchiban]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69 That's what I'd like to know.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noitora]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KirinIchiban  hehe Darth vado]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amnak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ducman69 Its not really.  The Mino HD is better.  But if you're buying an iPod Nano anyway, and it comes with a video recorder, are you really going to go out and buy a Mino?  For another $200+?  Similarly once all cell phones come with adequate "carried with you" video cameras, will you still buy a Mino?  That's the sense in which it competes.  Since the Mino isn't a full capability video camera, maybe it'll just vanish after a while.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fanfoot  I can't personally recommend the Mino over the big wide angle Creative VadoHD (can be had for $80) or new 1080p external mic jack Kodak Zi8 (which is on sale for $126 now).  In what ways did you find it better?   And while the iPod Nano isn't horrible, its not up to par with dedicated micro-camcorders IMO, and while you could argue its good enough for most, so too is the camera already integrated into most people's cellphones if you're willing to lower the bar.<br><br>Here's a vid of the VadoHD and Zi8 side-by-side.  I'll have to upload a camparo w/ the Mino and on the Zi8's new firmware which addressed my image shake complaint: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX_lPBb06-o" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX_lPBb06-o</a>  =)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KirinIchiban  I see what you did there..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johanu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2010 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[NO EXTERNAL MIC JACK!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[QmAn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@qman  YOU'VE OBVIOUSLY ENTIRELY MISSED THE POINT OF THESE DEVICES!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 9:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@PaulY  LOUD NOISES!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ducman69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 9:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[PAY ATTENTION TO ME!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[av8or]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 9:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Ross,<br><br>Not convinced.  Sure I know they want to build an ecosystem.  And they're trying in a limited way to build one.  But do you really think they're succeeding?  Have you used FlipShare?  Have you looked at the Engadget review of the FlipShareTV?  Neither is particularly brilliant.  Sure you can use FlipShare to post stuff to YouTube.  But as Apple moves towards posting clips directly to YouTube from your iPhone/Touch, do you really feel like Flip is competitive with that?  Do you actually think they're going to sell ANY of these stupid FlipShareTV things?<br><br>C'mon get real.  Sure maybe over time something might evolve, but so far I don't see it.  I can't imagine Apple is sweating this company at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 8:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[aw shittt, clever cisco, clever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[seangt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think it's a secret that one of the reasons that Nano sold more than the Flip is because, well it's a nano to begin with, very popular. And people would buy it anyway even if it didn't have a camera on it.<br>However, they may find it pretty cool to have that feature. <br>So it would be pointless to have an iPod that records video, and ALSO carry around another video camera]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mtnDewFTW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think DSLR's with video features are going to be the future of indie and experimental film]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poematik14]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 9:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cell phones are far from being a contender in this area due to battery power. Just look at the iPhone, it can barely sustain itself as a phone. Give us some better batteries before giving us a crappy video camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 10:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where is the switch to turn my flip into a light saber?<br><br>I actually won one of these two days ago, tried it, and it's ok for the average home user.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 17th 2009 10:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I prefer using a real camcorder. Like my Canon XHA1. Go big or go home.<br>Here's a sample:<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuyDsNsK7sk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuyDsNsK7sk</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[uShak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 2:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[@uShak <br><br>Um those days are also over, try a Canon D5 for amazing video!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Switched On: The camcorder strikes back]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/17/switched-on-the-camcorder-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA["FlipShare , which is clearly designed to be the equivalent of iTunes for video. "<br>In what way is FlipShare CLEARLY DESIGNED to be the equivalent of iTunes for video?  Beyond the ability to sync media, there is no equivalent.  But I'm interested in learning.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sracer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 9:16AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
