<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[This touch pad looks good, but I'm never letting go of my nipple!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[szfs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Abdel <br><br>Thats what she said.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Rubinsteine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Abdel <br><br>Thats no NETBOOK, Its a SPACESTATION!<br><br>WTF, are we calling any little sheet underpowered laptop a netbook because they say its a netbook...<br><br>Thats like saying my 1980's Volvo is a proper roadster because I put a rear wing on the trunk..<br><br>Cmon now get an F-in Laptop you dirty noobs.<br><br>Stop trying to whore you little laptop as a netbook.<br><br>This is NETBOOK the same wat an iPhone is a Cell phone... both are shite at the basic concept.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Name:]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Abdel<br><br>"All EEE's are laptops."<br><br>There. Done. Stop bitching. 'Netbook' is a superfluous label.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigD145]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 5:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  i know optical media is kind of dying, but when your machine gets gorked and needs to be doctored up a bit, you can't always count on being able to boot over USB. Another preview: <a href="http://bit.ly/asus-1201n-overview" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/asus-1201n-overview</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rasheedbill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2009 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[i want one so bad. the ASUS badge in place of the usual Eee one is almost enough to make me buy one]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kojo87 Agreed. I don't know why they ever decided to put the eee logo on any of their netbooks, it looks so tacky. I'm happy they came to their senses and put the slick ASUS logo back on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eraser]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[i have to critique this review...<br><br>i wouldn't call describe miley cyrus is in as "watchable".<br><br>thank you and good day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Kapoor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ravissimo  <br><br>She's certainly more watchable than she is listenable. Giggity, giggity]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EGOvoruhk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ravissimo <br><br>I think my daughter would disagree, but she doesn't know any better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maythetechbewithyou]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ravissimo me brain fail :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravi Kapoor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 6:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@EGOvoruhk  <br><br>Damn. beat me to it....giggity]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Streetfights]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 10:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kojo87 i know optical media is kind of dying, but when your machine gets gorked and needs to be doctored up a bit, you can't always count on being able to boot over USB. Another POV: <a href="http://bit.ly/asus-1201n-overview" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/asus-1201n-overview</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richardviled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2009 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@richardviled  i've never had a problem booting off a USB DVD drive when using either my 1008HA or 701 so i really don't understand your point.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2009 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[No No No No No!!!<br><br>If you want an 11 or 12 inch display, BUY A LAPTOP.  The entire appeal of "netbooks" is their small-size and easy portability.  I love my severely underpowered original eeePC 700 with it's 7" display.  It is painfully slow and the keyboard is cramped, but I can practically stick it in my back pocket ( ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fritz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[note: exaggeration ).  It is incredibly convenient because it can easily be dropped in any bag.<br><br>What you are reviewing loses all of the benefits of "netbooks" other than the price.  What you are reviewing is an underpowered cheap laptop.  I have been waiting to replace my netbook early next year and if I can't get a decent model that is 10" or smaller, I am going to be severely disapointed.<br><br><br>(It would have been nice to know in advance that Engadget's commenting system is so pathetically broken that half of my post would disappear due to use of an angle bracket)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fritz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still talking to myself here, didn't realize this POS was $499.  I take back what I said about it keeping the price benefit of being a netbook.  This machine has absolutely no relation to netbooks at all other than its $h!tty processor.  The battery life is even worse than several real laptops in similar price ranges.<br><br>Look at the badging, even ASUS knows this isn't a netbook.  Why else would they replace the eee badging with their regular logo as they do on LAPTOPS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fritz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fritz<br><br>Find me an 11 or 12 inch laptop packing Ion and a non "$h!tty processor"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EGOvoruhk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fritz  <br><br>Yup, that, and I had to scroll back up the page 2 times to re-hit the reply button, because although it used the anchor fine, it didn't set the comment box up so I was replying to you.<br><br>:( Engadget, just create a forum, link comments to there... use a commercial forum system like VP of PHP, problem solved.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Rubinsteine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@EGOvoruhk<br><br>Why would you want an ion when you are looking at this size?  Go 1 inch bigger and you could get an actual video card included.<br><br>Examples:<br>Nearly equivalent - <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834110399" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834110399</a><br>Or you could pay a bit more and get a real processor <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220597" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220597</a><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fritz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fritz  you cant get a 12 inch laptop with a decent graphic card for 500 tho. the smaller laptop get the more expensive they get.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Meas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fritz  <br><br>You think that single core Neo with an AMD 3200 will beat a dual core Atom with Ion?..<br><br>And you recommend I pay $100 more to get stuck with Intel GMA?..<br><br>Thanks, but not thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EGOvoruhk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 5:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fritz <br><br>I totally agree with you.<br><br>What is Engadget smoking, this thing isnt a netbook in price or in size and thats what the original selling points were.<br><br>I cried a little inside when the 9" models went out of fashion. It was the perfect size to me. Sure the keyboard might of been a little cramped but these wernt EVER meant to be work horses. I use mine to type in web addresses and in yahoo chat boxes, nothing more.<br><br>I love my Mini 9 and yes i agree, if i cant buy a netbook with a 10" or smaller screen you can count me out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adderz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 6:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Adamgs & @Fritz: Calm down.  The netbooks you want still exist.  This thing is actually an outlier.  There are lots of sub $400 10.2" netbooks still available, and a bunch more will be announced at CES in January when the new Atom's roll off the line.  This is a different beast for a different audience.  You don't have to buy it if you don't want to.  Go buy an Asus Eee 1005 or 1008 or an HP 110 or a Dell Mini 10v or a Toshiba NB205 or a ... (I could go on for a while)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fritz <br><br>Like Anand said in his HP mini review, pricing for ion netbooks is too high for what they provide.<br><br><a href="http://anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=3680" rel="nofollow">http://anandtech.com/mobile/showdoc.aspx?i=3680</a><br><br>Here's hoping ion 2 can get some competitive pricing going now that it's not tied directly to an intel processor (especially one that's bottlenecking the gpu).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wittaker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 10:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fritz their only appeal I can think so is their overpricedness.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Psygnosis2097]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really tempting, but I'm trying hard to wait until after CES to see what's new]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yule&bellow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@yulebellow <br><br>Save this comment and use it from October through December next year for every post.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superfresh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can it play Team Fortress 2 ? I need a computer that can do it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tib0o]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tib0o <br><br>I'm pretty sure it will.<br><br>Also $500?! Guessing that will rocket up when it is released here in the UK. I paid £230 for a Advent 4213 (N270, 1GB, 160GB, 3G) although I would like to get an ION netbook so this is damn tempting. Would be great for LANs rather than lugging my PC everywhere.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[richb93]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@richb93  I need a "i'm sure", not the "pretty" :D Anyone bought it ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tib0o]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tib0o  <br>I am 99.5% percent sure that this would run Tf2 at native res at good framerates. The Souce engine (Tf2's graphics engine) runs well even on low powered machines, and this is much better than the game's minimum requirements. You could be the real life version of the scout! :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SolidSnake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SolidSnake  Ok thanks a lot , i hope you wright ... (Anyone else ?)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tib0o]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 5:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tib0o <br><br>Maybe, I'd wait and see... the totally "playable" 20fps in Batman is quite discouraging.  Also, in order to be competetive online, you need AT LEAST 60fps average (meaning that in heavy battle FPS would drop to hopefully not below 30fps)...    In short,  I wouldn't recommend this for TF2..  the atom processor is  unbelievably NOT GOOD as far as gaming goes...  any ULV processor will spank this processor left and right...    No ion will save the atom monstrosity (which was supposed to go into a phone, not a laptop)...   I've had 3 (one dual core like this one) atom systems, and have been very impressed with battery life, size, etc... but have been completely devastated by performance, NO MORE ATOM FOR ME...  funk that shit...  they run at 100% all the time in any game...  <br><br>Have I whined enough about the poor performance of Atom?  I'm no Apple advocate, but I totally support Steve's decision not to jump into this cripple architecture....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pretol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 7:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tib0o<br><br>I'm 100% sure this can run TF2. I ran Orange Box on an AMD Turion x2 with a crappy Nvidia GeForce 6150. I did have to lower the graphics to low, but that computer ran the games fine.<br><br>At least I gave that piece of crap as a hand-me-down and got me an HP HDX 16t. Too bad HP discontinued that series of laptops.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Metayoshi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Tib0o Yes it could, quite well in fact.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RKN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 10:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanjs to all of you But you aren't agree ... <br>I think, i will wait for a better comuter (13")]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tib0o]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 8:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[6 hours to 2 hours? I never realize that atom and ion can consume such an amount of energy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chancekang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[why on earth would you spend $500 on this when you can get a much nicer Acer Timeline CULV for the same price?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[willow_twf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@willowtwf Good question.  All the posters who comment "Where's Ion" on every other netbook post seem to want something like this.  Whether they're willing to put their money down is another question.  My bet is no, since this thing still can't play Blu-Ray smoothly and still won't be a great gaming platform, which were in theory the reasons for this to exist.  Given the price and size and battery life impacts of going with the dual core and the Ion, this doesn't seem like it makes any sense at all.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@willowtwf <br>Ya, I don't know why Joanna considers this laptop a "game-changer" when there are faster CULV based laptops at the same price and screen size range (ie. the Acers you mentioned). Dedicated GPUs are only going to help in a very limited number of situations where as a faster CULV processor will be more useful. I don't get how so many people are screaming for dedicated GPUs so much. That GPU isn't going to make MS Word, non-DXVA compliant HD videos or the now bloated Engadget site run/load any faster. In most situations a faster CPU is better than a dedicated GPU.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[commenter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 2:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@comments  "In most situations a faster CPU is better than a dedicated GPU."<br><br>Yeah, but wouldn't it be nice if we could have both without breaking the bank? In any case, with the exception of gaming and heavy graphics work, I find the Atom to be adequate for most of what I do. Browsing, document editing, some minor picture editing, coding, watching video. My Ion-based HTPC plays HD video pretty well in most of the codecs I find online, so I'd be happy with an Ion netbook for most of what I do, provided it came at a reasonable price. This thing doesn't cut it for me because the battery life isn't very good and the price is too much, but it's close.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravnos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 4:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Engadget must have moved their 'Review' office to the sunshine state as there's no snow whatsoever on the stones..... <br><br>The touchpad is same as those on the HPs. I don't fancy them much. I'll keep my nipple as someone else already mentioned. Not so keen on the Eee thing.<br><br>It's getting so much confusing that I think Asus probably are better off naming these things something else.<br><br>The average consumer will be so confused after saying Eee like 10 times just trying to find the right product..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy Jones]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@xirsteon the bigger the number the bigger the screen. its really not that hard. 700 series was 7", 900 series is 9", 1000 series is 10" now guess what the 1200 series is.<br><br>the Eee 701 was the first netbook. hell they weren't even called netbooks then. as stupid as the Eee name is it would be foolish to ditch the brand that started all of this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kojo87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 3:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've been wanting this for awhile. Not being able to play HD video on my 1005HA is killing me, but the 3:30 hour battery life you mentioned is the downer here. I'll stick with my 8 hour battery life on my 1005HA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of all the artsy-fartsy glamour shots of the damn thing, there's not one shot showing the entire netbook head-on (open)!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SteveS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe, Just maybe if it cost US 399.99 I'd bite, but anything over that price and CLUV/Ultraportables make so much more sense to me.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaHarder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@DaHarder <br>Second.  Since you're no longer getting size or battery life benefits you might as well get a decent system.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[physicaloriginal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Glossy lid, palm rest, mouse rocker, screen..... This thing isn't a laptop it's a damn display piece. <br><br>I'm going to buy one to replace the centerpiece on my dining room table. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Certifiedfryguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/asus-eee-pc-1201n-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Umm.... Unemployment has passed 10%. Not exactly dropped...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wii60]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 4:39PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
