<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone have an opinion on the Klipsch iGroove SXT?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damn, I thought it was gonna be an iphone controlled zeppelin..  I am profoundly disappointed now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[T Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingtaz looks kinda like a chrome air ship, look at the unboxing video with terrible garage band music, so mute it, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkxKRF-TKRE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkxKRF-TKRE</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vic bishop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 3:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kingtaz Sorry, is just yet another fucking iPhone speaker system. Not newsworthy, but ok engadget..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johanu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2009 9:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ignoring for a moment whether this is good or bad, not having an EQ (or at least having a way to bypass it) is extremely common on any Hi-Fi kit over $400.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfticket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wolfticket <br><br>I don't know if $400 is the price point where tone controls become less common, but overall you are correct.  Over $2,000 and you'll almost never find tone controls.  Yes, you pay more and get less knobs.  Why?  The objective is to get the music coming out of the  system to match what happened in the recording studio to begin with.  The equalization curves used to record music are pretty much set in stone if your playback equimpent matches those cures, you should get out what was put in.  Tone controls usually are used to correct playback equipment that is not very good.  Fiddling with tone controls is like playing with the colors of the Sistine Chapel because you feel Michelangelo should have used more red.  You may be right, but Michelangelo did not use more red so you should see it for what it is.  <br><br>If you buy the right playback equimpment, you will not miss the tone controls.  Most music will sound great.  If it sounds bad, it is because it IS bad.  In the case of this B&W Zeppelin, it the bass is really that lacking, then the manufacturer messed up.  The fact that the tone controls are missing is not the problem.  You'd just be attempting to correct a playback device that has problems to begin with.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dancin']]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 12:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MidwestTechGuy  wow you have no idea whatsoever regarding what you are talking about. What you are describing is "accuracy", the desire to have sound output match the sound input in the recording studio. Accuracy is just one of the objectives of good sound systems. But let's pretend for the sake of argument that it is the only objective like you say. Do you have any idea how much of an effect the listening environment and its acoustic characteristics have on the sounds you hear? Unless your listening environment is exactly the same as the recording studio, the sounds being produced will not match the recorded sound no matter how accurate your equipment is. This is why you need equalizers, phase controls, etc., to adjust for the acoustic characteristics of the environment. A properly calibrated set of equipment will produce highly accurate renditions for listeners located in its sweet spot. But you are not going to be able to achieve that without having a wide range of controls over the reproduction of the sound.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AlexL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AlexL  You are partially right and partially wrong.  Look at almost all of the best preamps around and very few have any tone controls.  If I have no idea what I'm talking about then most of the industry does not know either.  <br><br>Your listening room will affect sound.  A carpeted room with drapes will sound duller than one with wood floors and no drapes.  A large room will sound different than a small room.  So matching components to your room is extremely important.  That is why the better high-end stores insist you take the equipment home to test it in your room to make sure you have a good match before you buy it.  To get the best sound, picking the right equipment for your room is what you need to do, instead of having the wrong equipment and trying to fix the sound with a tone control.  <br><br>The one component that has the biggest effect on sound is the speaker.  Choosing the right speaker for your room and your taste is very important, then getting the right amplifier and pre-amplifier (or integrated amp) that works well with that speaker is the next consideration.  A good retailer will help you sort this all out.  It may sound like a huge investment in time to get it right and a bit complicated.  But if you are the kind of person who would rather listen to a Miles Davis CD than watch an episode of Survivor, you will be greatly rewarded by this investment to get it right.<br><br>I left out another argument used against tone controls.  It introduces extra circuitry into the signal path. In the best equipment, that extra circuitry compromises the sound quality so the design goal becomes keeping the signal path as direct and clean as possible.  That is how you get the best sound.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dancin']]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 9:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[That thing is ugly, rich people spend money on some horrid looking stuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LowSky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Equivalent to a Bentley Motorcycle.<br><br>(And Ducati makes better ones, but Bentley will still get some customers, just like JBL and Bose in this case).<br><br>Design looks great, but one too many wines and that iPod dock is going to snap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[recharged95]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 11:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why buy this when you can just buy something like the Boston Acoustics Microsystem CD? I use it for basically everything. Its got every button imaginable on the top, slick remote, and excellent sound. AUX input in the front, tons more in the back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tikin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@tike0rz Well, quite. It's what sounds good to you that's important, and having proper control over that is essential, otherwise you're saying that all types of music are the same, all rooms are the same, and all personal preferences are the same, when clearly that's not the case. <br><br>I happen to have 5 rooms wired with B&W speakers, but they're still all driven from an amp where I can - and do - tweak the sound. The notion that the higher-end you go the less functionality is needed or provided strikes me as ridiculous and rather pompous. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AJH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is a bummer.<br><br>I have the large zeppelin and it sounds phenomenal. <br><br>I'd be interested in a review of the Klipsch unit as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheynk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@sheynk So you must be rich then? What's your secret? Engadget readers are dying to know!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bakkermaarten007]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm more interested in the mm1 at this point. Hopefully it will be more befitting of a B&W label...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[robotkiller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Aw, the Humanity...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alexksj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 12:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[The iHome iP1 is a great alternative at ~$250.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 12:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone's listening to Switchfoot's Hello Hurricane...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MisterSquared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MisterSquared Indeed!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren Murph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 5:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[love all the high quality speaker docks and headphones to listen to compressed mp3 files.  I guess bad speakers can make compressed music sound even worse.  Also doesn't the iPhone have a crappy DAC anyways??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[swilson23]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 12:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks very nice. Its bigger brother zeppelin is beautiful, but I like the smaller size of this. Bose better wake up... Would be good to see a wi-fi version so you can stream from your PC or control from iPhone, getting up to properly browse music gets boring very quickly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[ What do you guys suggest instead of the Zeppelin Mini? I like the looks but what great sound.  <br><br>I don't actually intend to dock anything to it. I was looking to hook a couple of these around the house to Airport Express' that I have in a mesh configuration. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeStalin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm a big B&W fan but I have to agree with the reviews.  It just didn't sound as good as other products under $150.  The one thing I didn't agree with the review is the EQ portion.  I don't ever mess with it.  I listen to music the way it was meant to be heard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sandalsocks]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 1:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a B&W fan for a number of years I admittedly have the urge to go deeper to understand how something got out of their factory with sub-par sound. I'd love to know what format the reviewer was using for playback, and if any experimentation was done with lossless codecs vs. mp3. Acknowledging that this is an ipod dock and should sound good playing anything that comes out of an ipod, I can't help wondering if it's more tuned to uncompressed media. I'd also love to know if it's a jump in quality to the full zeppelin that warrants the price difference. I have a hard time not thinking airport express by mini-toslink to a set of bookshelf B&Ws for 600 chickens if you've got a receiver, and if not and you're going to drop that much cash it might be better towards a full setup...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clubsilencio01]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 2:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if the lack of bass is an actual lack of bass or just the perceived lack of bass because other systems they are listening to have too much bass and this is actually more-accurately reproducing the music.  I'd love to see a frequency response graph with this article to kick up the objectiveness a bit more.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 2:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is the rear firing port against a wall? Without a wall to bounce the sound waves off of, this may explain the lack of bass.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EM1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@cherryboom <br><br>What is a gauger?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G. Snyder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah so you guys know that adjusting the EQ on the iPod/iPhone will work right?<br><br><br>Thats why there is no EQ on the unit, you can just do it on the player]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MDJCM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 7:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice stereo, nasty iPhone. Every heard of a microfiber?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[techwizard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2009 8:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA["We put it up against an aged Logitech mm50 (which can be found today for just over $100), and frankly, we didn't greatly prefer the Mini over the mm50. " <br><br>What a slap in the face to B&W. Try updating the Zeppelin Mini's software and see if you can tell a difference. I know I sure have. <br><br>I'd listen to my music through a Zeppelin over a Logitech speaker any day. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sminman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 10:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Sminman <br><br>The Zeppelin Mini has a software update?  And it improves the sound?  I'm not saying that it's not possible, but that seems very strange.<br><br>Secondly, in reference to your Logitech comment, it makes you sound like you are focusing on brand over preference of sound production.  I always try to do a blind test when I shop for any kind of audio device so that I can have an unbiased approach to a product.<br><br>A brand name or visual design can easily fool one's ears into thinking they're hearing something they might not be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[naterecording]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 9th 2010 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[Stupidly priced speakers.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bigsofty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Bowers &amp; Wilkins Zeppelin Mini impressions]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/18/bowers-and-wilkins-zeppelin-mini-impressions/</guid><description><![CDATA[While aesthetically superior, it performs no better than the cheaper bose sounddock II]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tristansq]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 17th 2010 9:03AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
