<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</guid><description><![CDATA[Samsung's lawyer must've been Jonathan Danger...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[N900]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 1:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</guid><description><![CDATA[Remind me again how Kodak is still relevant.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 1:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jeff <br>Just because they're no longer a powerful/big consumer brand, doesn't mean they're not a technologically relevant company. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mario Mejia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</guid><description><![CDATA['Tis the season to be merry so...... sue the bastards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rederikus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</guid><description><![CDATA[ME ANGGRRRYYY !! <a href="http://twitpic.com/u7xyq" rel="nofollow">http://twitpic.com/u7xyq</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ameen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</guid><description><![CDATA[This isn't twitter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wwhat  <a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2306/2269871896_7464b3bf66.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2306/2269871896_7464b3bf66.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tri5tan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified)  <br>Chicken one is funny, the 'angry' one self-serving self-congratulatory twitter self-indulgence IMHO.<br>And I think you should keep that on twitter and not make engadget a twitter extension, although I guess people are tricked into that by the engadget guys putting their twitter quotes in the sidebar, but hey it's their site and that does make a difference.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak wins preliminary ruling in patent squabble with Samsung]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/19/kodak-wins-preliminary-ruling-in-patent-squabble-with-samsung/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now samsung has to sue somebody else in turn to break even, and so the game continues.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
