<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[no wonder it doesn't need fans, the processor is outside the case!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric AHAF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[gief ion 2]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LukeCarroll]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's too bad, since people were pretty ok with netbook battery life in the first place; it was performance where improvements were most needed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 9:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[@John H <br><br>I'm glad they chose battery life over performance, Atom is powerful enough, not sure what you guys are running.  Netbooks don't have HDMI out so why would you need such a good performing processor?<br><br>I've used a netbook with Atom for almost two years now as my main computer and it works great, I can even use advanced desktop effects in Ubuntu.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 5:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[intel must be doing this on purpose so it doesn't eat some of higher end market for the avg joe consumer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phuz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have been waiting for the new chip set.  Now i am just going to be disappointed because without the Ion chip it is still garbage.  Call me when we can meet somewhere closer in the middle between battery life and a little more performance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fiereck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 10:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Fiereck I bought an Acer Aspire 1410 and it is a perfect balance of power/battery life.  It has the dual core Celeron SU2300 chip and handles HD just fine with HDMI out.  Screw this Atom business.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NorCalAngler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, it does what I want. I've been waiting for the D510 for a new home server, and the minimal power requirements were exactly what I was looking for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mmaestro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this chip might actually be good if they manage to replace the bridge with the ION 2 chip.<br>So we can use the ION2 power to run some 3D applications and HD videos when we have the lappy plugged to the wall and the GMA 3150 if we are using the battery.<br>Also, NOT having HDMI or USB 3 (which I presume\hope are gonna be included in ION2) by default might make these N450 computers outdated really quick IMO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Inu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dell will be selling their new mini 10 with the new chipset and a broadcom media accelerator therefor keeping the great battery life and allowing acceleration of hd video. <br><br>I think its the perfect comprimise. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Majortom1981]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[So the performance per watt mantra has hit the netbook and nettop market?  These new chips basically perform as well as the older ones but at a lower power consumption.  Come on Intel we like our cake and eating it too.  Where is the higher performance and lower power consumption?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[well, i would assume that the gpu wouldn't be up to par with competitor's. after all, we're talking about a PROCESSOR here people!! unless i'm missing something...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[graywolf790]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[@graywolf<br><br>Well, maybe you're missing the fact that the video circuitry is now part of the processor die?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Anybody that says this needs more performance,<br><br>Intel wants you to purchase culv chips or AMD Neo chips. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a12ctic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[@a12ctic <br><br>And yet they still refuse to pair CULV chips with any sort of dedicated graphics in nearly every case. Intel are really just being girls on this whole graphics situation.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Streetfights]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Streetfights  <br><br>Its a shame, I'd go for AMD's Neo platform if I was shopping for a ultra portable anyway. The 3200 can do some pretty decent low end video gaming. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a12ctic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[So, are the temperatures of these netbooks going to be lower?<br>Why no one else worries about temperature !?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elkin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 12:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[@edsc86 You see passive aluminum coolers on 90 Watts + graphics cards and they last the 4+ years expected, so why would anyone bother with 10W? :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Inu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 12:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA["... but fine battery life abounds, eh?"<br><br><br>Exactly.  "Eh" is precisely how I felt after reading those reviews.  The only Atom platform I would buy would be one with Ion.  Maybe the Via/Ion 2 combo can get their act in gear and make some sweet little netbooks/nettops.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[old_fogie_late_bloomer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 12:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Old fogie late bloomer <br>Got to agree. If only VIA had a way to jump to 40 or 45nm...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Inu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 1:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks for the information.  I thought about waiting to replace my netbook until the Pine Trail chips were released, but that will no longer be necessary.  How many currently available netbooks have the Ion GPU built into them?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ManekiNeko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's netbook and nettop Pine Trail Atom platforms explored, benchmarked]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/intels-netbook-and-nettop-pine-trail-atom-platforms-explored-b/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rant: Engadget GET A NEW PICTURE FOR ATOM ARTICLES. I don't know why that picture pisses me off, but it does. <br><br>Thats all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brockorr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2009 1:05AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
