<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about some optimism Engadget? If this works & granted its a big if , we could be in some good times :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arnie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 10:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@(Unverified) <br><br>Because this is more than likely an attempt to garner fresh grant money so they don't have to go out and get real jobs. I mean who wants to have to run around town with an unlicensed particle accelerator on their back these days?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Awesome reference to QuantumLeap!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 10:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@rjzak Al's handlink isn't the colorful see-through one in this shot, which tells us it's from an earlier episode.<br><br>It also tells us that I'm incredibly dorky for even knowing that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RyanTheGreat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@peestandingup  <br>Don't feel bad, I noticed it right off too.<br><br>Now for a more QL geekiness check: Do you have the soundtrack CD they put out?  I do.. and it didn't have the one track I was really hoping it would (bought back before there were samples for discs online to check and titles weren't all clear).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Miguelitosd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh boy...<br><br>(Mad props to Ziggy.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JakeMG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why am I dressed like a girl in a strip club?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. S.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 10:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@scolen2 Donno, but I like it!<br><br>Now DANCE for me again!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loocas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.xkcd.com/678/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xkcd.com/678/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoJew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@NeoJew My thoughts, exactly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigD145]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 1:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would be awesome but there's too many problems for this to happen within say... 30 years - manufacturing aside they're capacitors and wouldn't provide a (moderatly) stable voltage like batteries do and even if they did they'd be too dangerous. 10 X the energy of a lithium cell  = one hell of a bang if something goes wrong.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brantyr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with Kiwi :)<br><br>We desperately need a new revolutionary way to store energy and such great ideas can lead ahead in the path.<br><br>Its worth mentioning the other endeavor in same field which is pretty much possible - "Schindall's group has increased the charge and discharge rates and storage capacity of traditional ultracapacitors by using carbon nanotubes instead of activated carbon on the electrode's surface. In essence, this increases the surface area of the electrode" <br><br>Its taken from same article which author is referring to.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shreshthakumar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[The only problem I see with these is trying to find them when you need'em: it goes to say that just looking for them will cause the batteries to not exist.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AniMill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AniMill Not really. For example OFDM (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonal_frequency-division_multiplexing" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonal_frequency-division_multiplexing</a>) came 40 years back but its application only now in CDMA, Network on Power lines.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shreshthakumar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[We do need them. Badly.<br>Renewable sources energy must be trapped and used. for e.g. solar energy is available on in day. We need some storage to provide power at night same way as we get using a Thermal or other non-renewable turbine sources.<br><br>non-renewable are about to exhaust.<br><br>Few days back I read an article about solar energy being deployed some where in California.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shreshthakumar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Bill Gates <br>Cocaine's a helluva drug]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rickjamess04]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[If by batteries do you mean dick?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PedoBear(I want to meet you irl now!!!)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Quantum tunneling would make them all lose their charge rapidly, not sure what they teach these fools at MIT nowadays, everybody knows about quantum tunneling.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Wwhat <br><br>You didn't read the paper, they explicitly address that problem.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raffi256]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 5:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm, so a nano vacuum would stop it? Doesn't seem possible though, he should look at the troubles IBM/intel has as it is in practice to see how realistic that setup is, theory is one thing but reality another and we should at least take in the realities we already encountered when theorizing. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2009 10:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is about the 5th very promising battery innovation that has come out in the last 2 years, most promising 10 times the battery power of current batteries.  <br><br>Now if only the scientists of these discoveries could get together and share in the profits of course, to take all of their battery recipes and make ones that last 50 times current batteries, take 5 minutes for a full charge, discharges slower and will last for a lifetime... and bring them out asap...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wesley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[But wait, what if we take those superbatteries and inject stemmcells!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ziggy says there is a 0.15% probably of seeing this during my lifetime.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 12:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure battery technology, and technology in general, will stay largely the same for another 20 years.<br><br>Smartphones will simply become gradually capable until some intelligent company releases one that connects to your monitor and switches to a desktop interface.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gibson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[More like when Hell freezes over!<br><br>Oh, wait...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CH3BURASHKA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[words zpm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Atlantian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Atlantian <br>ZedPM!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ED]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 5:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[This coming soon and practical cold fusion is right around the corner (as always).  No wonder they gave us the the screengrab to go with the... meal...<br><br>Oh boy indeed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[My quantum battery is fully charged, and it's completely out of power.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ED]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it's going to take a year to build, then you'll probably see it on the market in 5 years or less. Bitches don't know about my Kurzweilian growth.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamizar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Quantum batteries are theoretically awesome, practically non-existent]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/22/quantum-batteries-are-theoretically-awesome-practically-non-exi/</guid><description><![CDATA["It's like a who's who of undelivered promises got together and united to form one giant and impossible dream..."<br><br>My new favourite Engadget line 2009.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[triplesowcow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2009 6:12PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
