<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Averatec's HS-105 netbook looks good, should've waited for Pine Trail</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Averatec's HS-105 netbook looks good, should've waited for Pine Trail</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Averatec's HS-105 netbook looks good, should've waited for Pine Trail]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is this here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leindurstit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2009 8:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Averatec's HS-105 netbook looks good, should've waited for Pine Trail]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</guid><description><![CDATA[Engadget is so freaking obsessed with Pine Trail. Nevermind that it provides negligible performance gains over current Atom setups according to the benchmarks I have seen.<br><br>Also worth mentioning, has anyone noticed that the newer Pine Trail netbooks are a fair bit thicker than their N270/N280 counterparts?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Conceyted]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2009 8:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Averatec's HS-105 netbook looks good, should've waited for Pine Trail]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Conceyted  <br>PineTrail is big because it increases battery life. The whole point of a netbook for me is being able to take it to school, and take notes all day without plugging it in.<br><br>They are thicker to start. It should allow thinner netbooks later on,]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA['Vette Dude]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2009 8:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Averatec's HS-105 netbook looks good, should've waited for Pine Trail]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</guid><description><![CDATA[@VetteDude  hey I don't get this "thinner than earlier", when there are other components too, that determine the thickness]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[avis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2009 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Averatec's HS-105 netbook looks good, should've waited for Pine Trail]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/12/23/averatecs-hs-105-netbook-looks-good-shouldve-waited-for-pine/</guid><description><![CDATA[My current N280 netbook gets a little over 8hrs of battery life, which is more than enough for a whole day's worth of note taking in class...and then some.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorefest]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2009 8:57AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
